A systematic review and meta-analysis of postmastectomy radiation therapy on prepectoral versus subpectoral breast reconstruction

被引:3
|
作者
Zheng, Caihong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Jiameng [4 ]
Wen, Yahui [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lin, Shunguo [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Han, Hui [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Xu, Chunsen [2 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Med Univ, Grad Sch, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Fujian Med Univ, Dept Breast Surg, Union Hosp, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Fujian Med Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Union Hosp, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Xiamen Univ, Women & Childrens Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Breast Surg, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[5] Fujian Med Univ, Breast Canc Inst, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2023年 / 9卷
关键词
breast; reconstration; postmastectomy; radiation; prepectoral; subspectral; MASTECTOMY;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2022.1019950
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundPrepectoral breast reconstruction has once again appealed, which attributes to the introduction of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) and mesh. Postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT), meanwhile, is crucial in the whole course of treatment for breast cancer patients with lymph node-positive. The impact of PMRT on outcomes after prepectoral breast reconstruction has not been clearly defined to date. This study aimed to compare the impact of PMRT on outcomes after prepectoral vs. subpectoral breast reconstruction. MethodsA comprehensive research on databases including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane libraries was performed to retrieve literature pertaining to prepectoral breast reconstruction from database inception to October 2021. All included studies evaluated the impact of PMRT on outcomes after breast reconstruction. Only studies comparing patients who underwent prepectoral breast reconstruction with a control group who underwent subpectoral breast reconstruction were included. Data were analyzed using RevMan version 5.2. ResultsA total of 4 studies were included in the meta-analysis, with a total of 394 breasts. In the setting of postmastectomy radiation therapy, 164 breasts were reconstructed with a prepectoral approach, whereas the remaining 230 breasts underwent subpectoral reconstruction. Overall, outcomes between PBR and SBR was no statistical significance in the overall complications (OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 0.35-4.85), infection (OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 0.90-2.91), seroma (OR: 1.60, 95% CI: 0.48-5.27), skin flap necrosis (OR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.17-3.45), hematoma (OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.10-1.41), wound dehiscence (OR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.36-1.85). But, included studies lacked data about the patient quality of life and satisfaction with the outcome of the reconstructed breast. ConclusionsIn the setting of postmastectomy radiation therapy, prepectoral breast reconstruction is a safe and effective option.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Intraoperative Hypothermia Versus Normothermia in Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Putra, Teuku N.
    Sayudo, Iqbal F.
    Sudarman, Jesica P.
    Krish, Krish
    Vellaichamy, Swathi
    Nadila, Islah
    Filho, Marcilio O.
    THERAPEUTIC HYPOTHERMIA AND TEMPERATURE MANAGEMENT, 2025, 15 (01) : 10 - 16
  • [22] Systematic review and meta-analysis of immediate versus delayed autologous breast reconstruction in the setting of post-mastectomy adjuvant radiation therapy
    Hershenhouse, Korri S.
    Bick, Katherine
    Shauly, Orr
    Kondra, Katelyn
    Ye, Jason
    Gould, Daniel J.
    Patel, Ketan M.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2021, 74 (05) : 931 - 944
  • [23] Comparing hypofractionated to conventional fractionated radiotherapy in postmastectomy breast cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Liu, Lei
    Yang, Yongqiang
    Guo, Qi
    Ren, Bixin
    Peng, Qiliang
    Zou, Li
    Zhu, Yaqun
    Tian, Ye
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [24] Feasibility and Efficacy of Decision Aids to Improve Decision Making for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Berlin, Nicholas L.
    Tandon, Vickram J.
    Hawley, Sarah T.
    Hamill, Jennifer B.
    MacEachern, Mark P.
    Lee, Clara N.
    Wilkins, Edwin G.
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2019, 39 (01) : 5 - 20
  • [25] Assessing Postsurgical Outcomes with Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Literature Review and Meta-analysis Update
    Chatterjee, Abhishek
    Nahabedian, Maurice Y.
    Gabriel, Allen
    Sporck, Michael
    Parekh, Mousam
    Macarios, David
    Hammer, Jason
    Sigalove, Steven
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2021, 9 (10) : E3825
  • [26] A Comparative Analysis between Subpectoral versus Prepectoral Single Stage Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction
    Kim, Jeong-Hoon
    Hong, Seung Eun
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2020, 56 (10): : 1 - 10
  • [27] Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction in High-Body Mass Index Patients
    Walker, Nicholas J.
    Park, Jungwon G.
    Maus, Jacob C.
    Motamedi, Vida
    Rebowe, Ryan E.
    Runyan, Christopher M.
    Tucker, Scott L.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2021, 87 (02) : 136 - 143
  • [28] Considerations for patient selection: Prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction
    Yang, Jun Young
    Kim, Chan Woo
    Lee, Jang Won
    Kim, Seung Ki
    Lee, Seung Ah
    Hwang, Euna
    ARCHIVES OF PLASTIC SURGERY-APS, 2019, 46 (06): : 550 - 557
  • [29] Revision Rates in Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Delayed-Immediate Autologous Breast Reconstruction
    Patel, Ashraf A.
    Cemaj, Sophie L.
    Martin, Shanique A.
    Cheesborough, Jennifer E.
    Lee, Gordon K.
    Nazerali, Rahim S.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2021, 86 (5S) : S409 - S413
  • [30] Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy in Women with Breast Cancer: A Systematic and Meta-Analysis Review
    Anbiyaiee, Amir
    Dari, Mahrokh Abouali Galeh
    Anbiyaee, Omid
    Anbiyaiee, Abolghasem
    WORLD JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 9 (01) : 3 - 9