A systematic review and meta-analysis of postmastectomy radiation therapy on prepectoral versus subpectoral breast reconstruction

被引:3
|
作者
Zheng, Caihong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Jiameng [4 ]
Wen, Yahui [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lin, Shunguo [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Han, Hui [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Xu, Chunsen [2 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Med Univ, Grad Sch, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Fujian Med Univ, Dept Breast Surg, Union Hosp, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Fujian Med Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Union Hosp, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Xiamen Univ, Women & Childrens Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Breast Surg, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[5] Fujian Med Univ, Breast Canc Inst, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2023年 / 9卷
关键词
breast; reconstration; postmastectomy; radiation; prepectoral; subspectral; MASTECTOMY;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2022.1019950
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundPrepectoral breast reconstruction has once again appealed, which attributes to the introduction of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) and mesh. Postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT), meanwhile, is crucial in the whole course of treatment for breast cancer patients with lymph node-positive. The impact of PMRT on outcomes after prepectoral breast reconstruction has not been clearly defined to date. This study aimed to compare the impact of PMRT on outcomes after prepectoral vs. subpectoral breast reconstruction. MethodsA comprehensive research on databases including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane libraries was performed to retrieve literature pertaining to prepectoral breast reconstruction from database inception to October 2021. All included studies evaluated the impact of PMRT on outcomes after breast reconstruction. Only studies comparing patients who underwent prepectoral breast reconstruction with a control group who underwent subpectoral breast reconstruction were included. Data were analyzed using RevMan version 5.2. ResultsA total of 4 studies were included in the meta-analysis, with a total of 394 breasts. In the setting of postmastectomy radiation therapy, 164 breasts were reconstructed with a prepectoral approach, whereas the remaining 230 breasts underwent subpectoral reconstruction. Overall, outcomes between PBR and SBR was no statistical significance in the overall complications (OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 0.35-4.85), infection (OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 0.90-2.91), seroma (OR: 1.60, 95% CI: 0.48-5.27), skin flap necrosis (OR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.17-3.45), hematoma (OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.10-1.41), wound dehiscence (OR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.36-1.85). But, included studies lacked data about the patient quality of life and satisfaction with the outcome of the reconstructed breast. ConclusionsIn the setting of postmastectomy radiation therapy, prepectoral breast reconstruction is a safe and effective option.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Complications After Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction in Patients Receiving Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhang, Xue
    Ning, Shuhua
    Zhang, Yankun
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2024, 48 (21) : 4421 - 4429
  • [2] Examining the Effects of Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy in Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Autologous Breast Reconstruction
    Patel, Ashraf A.
    Arquette, Connor P.
    Yesantharao, Pooja S.
    Borrelli, Mimi R.
    Broderick, Kristen P.
    Cheesborough, Jennifer E.
    Lee, Gordon K.
    Nazerali, Rahim S.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2021, 86 (5S) : S390 - S394
  • [3] The Impact of Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy on the Outcomes of Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Abdelrahman Awadeen
    Mohamed Fareed
    Ali Mohamed Elameen
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2023, 47 : 81 - 91
  • [4] The Impact of Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy on the Outcomes of Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Awadeen, Abdelrahman
    Fareed, Mohamed
    Elameen, Ali Mohamed
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023, 47 (01) : 81 - 91
  • [5] Comparison of Outcomes Following Prepectoral and Subpectoral Implants for Breast Reconstruction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Megevand, Vladimir
    Scampa, Matteo
    McEvoy, Helen
    Kalbermatten, Daniel F.
    Oranges, Carlo M.
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (17)
  • [6] Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction A Meta-analysis
    Li, Yunzhu
    Xu, Gang
    Yu, Nanze
    Huang, Jiuzuo
    Long, Xiao
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 85 (04) : 437 - 447
  • [7] Comparison of prepectoral and subpectoral breast reconstruction after mastectomies: A systematic review and meta analysis
    Li, Lun
    Su, Yonghui
    Xiu, Bingqiu
    Huang, Xiaoyan
    Chi, Weiru
    Hou, Jianjing
    Zhang, Yingying
    Tian, Jinhui
    Wang, Jia
    Wu, Jiong
    EJSO, 2019, 45 (09): : 1542 - 1550
  • [8] Postoperative Complications Following Prepectoral Versus Partial Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using ADM: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Zhu, Liwen
    Liu, Chunjun
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023, 47 (04) : 1260 - 1273
  • [9] Quality of life, pain of prepectoral and subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with a discussion on cost: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ching, Ann Hui
    Lim, Kimberley
    Sze, Pek Wan
    Ooi, Adrian
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2022, 75 (08) : 2550 - 2560
  • [10] Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy
    Elswick, Sarah M.
    Harless, Christin A.
    Bishop, Sarah N.
    Schleck, Cathy D.
    Mandrekar, Jay
    Reusche, Ryan D.
    Mutter, Robert W.
    Boughey, Judy C.
    Jacobson, Steven R.
    Lemaine, Valerie
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 142 (01) : 1 - 12