Predictive value of age, creatinine, and ejection fraction (ACEF) scoring system for operative mortality in patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection

被引:1
作者
Bayram, Muhammed [1 ]
Duman, Zihni Mert [2 ]
Timur, Baris [3 ]
Yasar, Emre [1 ]
Ustunisik, Cigdem Tel [4 ]
Kaplan, Mustafa Can [1 ]
Kadirogullari, Ersin [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thorac & Cardiovasc Su, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, TR-34303 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Cizre State Hosp, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, TR-72200 Sirnak, Turkey
[3] Istanbul Siyami Ersek Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg Tr, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, TR-34668 Istanbul, Turkey
[4] Istanbul Univ, Cerrahpasa Fac Med, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Type A aortic dissection; ACEF score; Operative mortality; Prognosis; INTERNATIONAL-REGISTRY; RISK; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1007/s12055-022-01431-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose Stanford type A aortic dissection (TAAD) is the most common and fatal type of dissection. An easier-to-use risk stratification may help eliminate bias in patients at high risk of dissection. The age, serum creatinine, and ejection fraction (ACEF) score is a simple risk model developed to predict the mortality risk of elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between preoperative ACEF score and operative mortality in patients with TAAD undergoing emergency surgery. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, 113 patients diagnosed with TAAD between January 2017 and September 2021 were evaluated. The primary endpoint was operative mortality. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed for the ACEF score, ACEF II score, and European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II. Univariate and multivariate analyses of operative mortality were performed using the logistic regression model. Results Operative mortality occurred in 23 (20.4%) patients. The cutoff ACEF score was calculated as 1.1 for predicting operative mortality (area under the curve = 0.712, P value = 0.002, sensitivity = 74.0%, specificity = 67.8%, likelihood ratio = 2.3). Based on the cutoff value, 46 (40.7%) patients had a high ACEF score (ACEF >= 1.1) and 67 (59.3%) patients had a low ACEF score (ACEF < 1.1). The high ACEF score was associated with an increased incidence of operative mortality compared with the low ACEF score (37.0% vs. 9.0%; P = 0.001). Conclusions The ACEF score can be used as a useful and relatively simple tool for risk stratification before TAAD surgery. However, the ACEF score is only indicated for risk assessment and should not affect treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:6 / 13
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Reliability of new scores in predicting perioperative mortality after mitral valve surgery
    Barili, Fabio
    Pacini, Davide
    Grossi, Claudio
    Di Bartolomeo, Roberto
    Alamanni, Francesco
    Parolari, Alessandro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 147 (03) : 1008 - 1012
  • [2] Is surgery always mandatory for type a aortic dissection?
    Centofanti, Paolo
    Flocco, Roberto
    Ceresa, Fabrizio
    Attisani, Matteo
    La Torre, Michele
    Weltert, Luca
    Calafiore, Antonio Maria
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2006, 82 (05) : 1658 - 1664
  • [3] Early and late outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection: analysis of risk factors in 487 consecutive patients
    Chiappini, B
    Schepens, M
    Tan, E
    Amore, AD
    Morshuis, W
    Dossche, K
    Bergonzini, M
    Camurri, N
    Reggiani, LB
    Marinelli, G
    Di Bartolomeo, R
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2005, 26 (02) : 180 - 186
  • [4] Predictive ability of ACEF and ACEF II score in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the GLOBAL LEADERS study
    Chichareon, Ply
    Modolo, Rodrigo
    van Klaveren, David
    Takahashi, Kuniaki
    Kogame, Norihiro
    Chang, Chun-Chin
    Katagiri, Yuki
    Tomaniak, Mariusz
    Asano, Taku
    Spitzer, Ernest
    Buszman, Pawel
    Prokopczuk, Janusz
    Fath-Ordoubadi, Farzin
    Buysschaert, Ian
    Anderson, Richard
    Oldroyd, Keith G.
    Merkely, Bela
    Garg, Scot
    Wykrzykowska, Joanna J.
    Piek, Jan J.
    Juni, Peter
    Hamm, Christian
    Steg, Philippe Gabriel
    Valgimigli, Marco
    Vranckx, Pascal
    Windecker, Stephan
    Onuma, Yoshinobu
    Serruys, Patrick W.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 286 : 43 - 50
  • [5] Coady M.A., 1999, Cardiol Clin, V17, P615, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0733-8651(05)70105-3
  • [6] Insights From the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection A 20-Year Experience of Collaborative Clinical Research
    Evangelista, Arturo
    Isselbacher, Eric M.
    Bossone, Eduardo
    Gleason, Thomas G.
    Di Eusanio, Marco
    Sechtem, Udo
    Ehrlich, Marek P.
    Trimarchi, Santi
    Braverman, Alan C.
    Myrmel, Truls
    Harris, Kevin M.
    Hutchinson, Stuart
    O'Gara, Patrick
    Suzuki, Toru
    Nienaber, Christoph A.
    Eagle, Kim A.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2018, 137 (17) : 1846 - +
  • [7] Preoperative Predictors of Adverse Clinical Outcome in Emergent Repair of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection in 15 Year Follow Up
    Freundt, Miriam
    Kolat, Philipp
    Friedrich, Christine
    Salem, Mohamed
    Gruenewald, Matthias
    Elke, Gunnar
    Puehler, Thomas
    Cremer, Jochen
    Haneya, Assad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (22)
  • [8] Population-Based Study of Incidence and Outcome of Acute Aortic Dissection and Premorbid Risk Factor Control 10-Year Results From the Oxford Vascular Study
    Howard, Dominic P. J.
    Banerjee, Amitava
    Fairhead, Jack F.
    Perkins, Jeremy
    Silver, Louise E.
    Rothwell, Peter M.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2013, 127 (20) : 2031 - +
  • [9] A preoperative mortality risk assessment model for Stanford type A acute aortic dissection
    Kuang, Juntao
    Yang, Jue
    Wang, Qiuji
    Yu, Changjiang
    Li, Ying
    Fan, Ruixin
    [J]. BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [10] Epidemiology of thoracic aortic dissection
    LeMaire, Scott A.
    Russell, Ludivine
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 8 (02) : 103 - 113