Effect of Bionic Crab Shell Attitude Parameters on Lift and Drag in a Flow Field

被引:1
作者
Hu, Shihao [1 ]
Chen, Xi [2 ]
Li, Jiawei [3 ]
Yu, Peiye [3 ]
Xin, Mingfei [3 ]
Pan, Biye [3 ]
Li, Sicen [1 ]
Tang, Qinyun [1 ]
Wang, Liquan [1 ]
Ding, Mingxuan [1 ]
Liu, Kaixin [3 ]
Liu, Zhaojin [1 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Engn Univ, Coll Mech & Elect Engn, Harbin 150001, Peoples R China
[2] Heilongjiang Inst Technol, Coll Mech & Elect Engn, Harbin 150050, Peoples R China
[3] Harbin Engn Univ, Coll Shipbldg Engn, Harbin 150001, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
hydrodynamic simulation; bionics; attitude adjustment; underwater motion; lift and drag coefficient; LEGGED LOCOMOTION; WALKING; DESIGN;
D O I
10.3390/biomimetics9020081
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Underwater bionic-legged robots encounter significant challenges in attitude, velocity, and positional control due to lift and drag in water current environments, making it difficult to balance operational efficiency with motion stability. This study delves into the hydrodynamic properties of a bionic crab robot's shell, drawing inspiration from the sea crab's motion postures. It further refines the robot's underwater locomotion strategy based on these insights. Initially, the research involved collecting attitude data from crabs during underwater movement through biological observation. Subsequently, hydrodynamic simulations and experimental validations of the bionic shell were conducted, examining the impact of attitude parameters on hydrodynamic performance. The findings reveal that the transverse angle predominantly influences lift and drag. Experiments in a test pool with a crab-like robot, altering transverse angles, demonstrated that increased transverse angles enhance the robot's underwater walking efficiency, stability, and overall performance.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] A review on locomotion robophysics: the study of movement at the intersection of robotics, soft matter and dynamical systems
    Aguilar, Jeffrey
    Zhang, Tingnan
    Qian, Feifei
    Kingsbury, Mark
    McInroe, Benjamin
    Mazouchova, Nicole
    Li, Chen
    Maladen, Ryan
    Gong, Chaohui
    Travers, Matt
    Hatton, Ross L.
    Choset, Howie
    Umbanhowar, Paul B.
    Goldman, Daniel I.
    [J]. REPORTS ON PROGRESS IN PHYSICS, 2016, 79 (11)
  • [2] Trends in Stroke Kinematics, Reynolds Number, and Swimming Mode in Shrimp-Like Organisms (vol 62, pg 791, 2022)
    Ruszczyk, Melissa
    Webster, Donald R.
    Yen, Jeannette
    [J]. INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2023, 63 (03) : 860 - 860
  • [3] Underwater walking
    Ayers, J
    [J]. ARTHROPOD STRUCTURE & DEVELOPMENT, 2004, 33 (03) : 347 - 360
  • [4] Low effective mechanical advantage of giraffes' limbs during walking reveals trade-off between limb length and locomotor performance
    Basu, Christopher
    Hutchinson, John R.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2022, 119 (28)
  • [5] Model-Based Tracking of Fruit Flies in Free Flight
    Ben-Dov, Omri
    Beatus, Tsevi
    [J]. INSECTS, 2022, 13 (11)
  • [6] BLAKE RW, 1985, J ZOOL, V207, P407
  • [7] Wetting transitions on biomimetic surfaces
    Bormashenko, Edward
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2010, 368 (1929): : 4695 - 4711
  • [8] Study on the Design and Experimental Research on a Bionic Crab Robot with Amphibious Multi-Modal Movement
    Chen, Xi
    Li, Jiawei
    Hu, Shihao
    Han, Songjie
    Liu, Kaixin
    Pan, Biye
    Wang, Jixin
    Wang, Gang
    Ma, Xinmeng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 10 (12)
  • [9] Sideways crab-walking is faster and more efficient than forward walking for a hexapod robot
    Chen, Yang
    Grezmak, John E.
    Graf, Nicole M.
    Daltorio, Kathryn A.
    [J]. BIOINSPIRATION & BIOMIMETICS, 2022, 17 (04)
  • [10] Performance and Kinematic Differences Between Terrestrial and Aquatic Running in Anolis Sagrei
    Cheu, Amy Y.
    Reed, Samantha A.
    Mann, Sara D.
    Bergmann, Philip J.
    [J]. INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2022, 62 (04) : 840 - 851