A Systematic Decision-Making Approach for Quality Function Deployment Based on Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets

被引:0
|
作者
Chen, Siji [1 ]
Zhang, Yueyi [1 ]
Gong, Jun [1 ]
机构
[1] China Jiliang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2023年 / 13卷 / 24期
关键词
quality function deployment; hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set; 2-tuple linguistic model; Best-Worst Method; technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution; MODEL; QFD; QUANTIFICATION; FRAMEWORK; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.3390/app132413104
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
As a powerful tool for improving customer satisfaction, quality function deployment (QFD) can convert customer requirements (CRs) into engineering characteristics (ECs) during product development and design. Aiming to address the deficiencies of traditional QFD in expert evaluation, CRs' weight determination and ECs' importance ranking, this paper proposes an enhanced QFD model that integrates hesitant fuzzy binary semantic variables, the Best-Worst Method (BWM), and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The objective is to determine the prioritization of product engineering characteristics. Indeed, hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets (HFLTS) have found extensive application in decision-making problems. Compared to other fuzzy language methods, HFLTS offers greater convenience and flexibility in addressing decision-makers' hesitations and uncertainties. Initially, the combination of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets with interval binary tuple language variables is employed to articulate the uncertainty in the assessment information provided by QFD team members. Subsequently, the improved BWM and TOPSIS methods based on HFLTS are used to improve the accuracy of the importance ranking of engineering characteristics by determining the weights of CRs and prioritizing ECs in two stages. Finally, the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method are validated through an illustrative example.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Weighted hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and its application in group decision making
    Zeng, Wenyi
    Li, Deqing
    Yin, Qian
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2019, 37 (01) : 1099 - 1112
  • [32] Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets for Group Decision Making in Supplier Performance Evaluation
    Seth, Taniya
    Gupta, Prashant K.
    Muhuri, Pranab K.
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS (FUZZ-IEEE), 2018,
  • [33] A Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Multi-criteria Decision-Making Approach Based on Regret Theory
    Xia, Meimei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2018, 20 (07) : 2135 - 2143
  • [35] A Multi-Enterprise Quality Function Deployment Paradigm with Unstructured Decision-Making in Linguistic Contexts
    Peng, Jian'gang
    Xia, Guang
    Sun, Baoqun
    Wang, Shaojie
    JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND ELECTRONICS, 2023, 34 (04) : 966 - 980
  • [36] A group decision-making approach to uncertain quality function deployment based on fuzzy preference relation and fuzzy majority
    Yan, Hong-Bin
    Ma, Tieju
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2015, 241 (03) : 815 - 829
  • [37] Grey linguistic term sets for decision-making
    Du, Junliang
    Xie, Naiming
    Liu, Sifeng
    Goh, Mark
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2023, 348 (1) : 489 - 509
  • [38] A group decision-making method with fuzzy set theory and genetic algorithms in quality function deployment
    Liu, Chin-Hung
    QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2010, 44 (06) : 1175 - 1189
  • [39] A Novel Multicriteria Group Decision-Making Approach with Hesitant Picture Fuzzy Linguistic Information
    Yang, Lin
    Wu, Xiao-hui
    Qian, Jie
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2020, 2020
  • [40] Generalized correlation coefficients of the hesitant fuzzy sets and the hesitant fuzzy soft sets with application in group decision-making
    Singh, Surender
    Lalotra, Sumita
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2018, 35 (03) : 3821 - 3833