Dynamic Policy Evaluation for Ethical Decision-Making in Autonomous Vehicles

被引:0
作者
Detjen-Leal, Daniel [1 ]
Quijano, Nicanor [1 ]
Francisco Rodriguez, Carlos [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Los Andes, Sch Engn, Bogota, Colombia
来源
2023 IEEE 6TH COLOMBIAN CONFERENCE ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, CCAC | 2023年
关键词
Autonomous vehicles; Ethical Behavior; Decision Making; Ethical dilemma; IMPACT SPEED; FATALITY; INJURY;
D O I
10.1109/CCAC58200.2023.10333721
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
As self-driving vehicles develop, they may encounter situations in which all possible actions lead to an accident, commonly referred to as ethical dilemmas. Research in this area suggests that these dilemmas are limited to a fatal failure of braking systems. This paper outlines an approach to address ethical dilemmas involving autonomous vehicles (AVs), where the AV dynamically adapts its decision policy to minimize the harm generated in a possible accident. The proposed model uses a Markov decision process (MDP), to define the actions that the AV should carry out. The AV action is selected based on the potential harm to different stakeholders, such as passengers, pedestrians, cyclists, and other drivers. The ethical decision-making component is added adapting the reward function, to consider different ethical principles that should guide the decision process in dilemma situations. Our suggested study cases demonstrate that AVs can conduct numerous policy reevaluations, which result in the vehicle's trajectory being adapted based on the ethical evaluation. These results emphasize the significance of ethical deliberation not only in crucial situations like brake failure but also in normal driving conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 141
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] The Moral Machine experiment
    Awad, Edmond
    Dsouza, Sohan
    Kim, Richard
    Schulz, Jonathan
    Henrich, Joseph
    Shariff, Azim
    Bonnefon, Jean-Francois
    Rahwan, Iyad
    [J]. NATURE, 2018, 563 (7729) : 59 - +
  • [2] Broome J., 2017, Equality, de Weighing Goods, P174
  • [3] Autonomous Agents and Ethical Decision-Making
    Cervantes, Jose-Antonio
    Rodriguez, Luis-Felipe
    Lopez, Sonia
    Ramos, Felix
    Robles, Francisco
    [J]. COGNITIVE COMPUTATION, 2016, 8 (02) : 278 - 296
  • [4] de Moura N, 2020, IEEE INT VEH SYM, P2006, DOI 10.1109/IV47402.2020.9304618
  • [5] Approaching the social dilemma of autonomous vehicles with a general social welfare function
    Ebina, Takeshi
    Kinjo, Keita
    [J]. ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 104
  • [6] Estivill-Castro V, 2019, INTEL SYST CONTR AUT, V95, P25, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-12524-0_4
  • [7] Ethical Decision Making in Autonomous Vehicles: The AV Ethics Project
    Evans, Katherine
    de Moura, Nelson
    Chauvier, Stephane
    Chatila, Raja
    Dogan, Ebru
    [J]. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2020, 26 (06) : 3285 - 3312
  • [8] DRIVER INJURY AND FATALITY RISK IN 2-CAR CRASHES VERSUS MASS-RATIO INFERRED USING NEWTONIAN MECHANICS
    EVANS, L
    [J]. ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 1994, 26 (05) : 609 - 616
  • [9] Public Health, Ethics, and Autonomous Vehicles
    Fleetwood, Janet
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 107 (04) : 532 - 537
  • [10] He HM, 2020, 2020 THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ROBOTICS AND CONTROL ENGINEERING (IRCE 2020), P68, DOI [10.1109/irce50905.2020.9199244, 10.1109/IRCE50905.2020.9199244]