Time-Kill Analysis of Canine Skin Pathogens: A Comparison of Pradofloxacin and Marbofloxacin

被引:2
作者
Azzariti, Stefano [1 ]
Mead, Andrew [1 ]
Toutain, Pierre-Louis [1 ,2 ]
Bond, Ross [3 ]
Pelligand, Ludovic [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Royal Vet Coll, Dept Comparat Biomed Sci, Hawkshead Lane, North Hatfield AL9 7TA, Herts, England
[2] Univ Toulouse, Ecole Natl Vet Toulouse, INTHERES, INRAE, 23 Chemin Capelles,BP 87614, Toulouse 03, France
[3] Royal Vet Coll, Dept Clin Sci & Serv, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, Hatfield AL9 7TA, Herts, England
来源
ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL | 2023年 / 12卷 / 10期
关键词
canine pyoderma; Staphylococcus spp; Escherichia coli; fluoroquinolones; MIC; mathematical modelling; semi-mechanistic model; PK/PD index; dose fractionation; resistance; ESCHERICHIA-COLI; PHARMACOKINETIC/PHARMACODYNAMIC INTEGRATION; STAPHYLOCOCCUS-PSEUDINTERMEDIUS; PHARMACOKINETICS; PHARMACODYNAMICS; RESISTANCE; MODEL; MECHANISM; DOXYCYCLINE; CEFAZOLIN;
D O I
10.3390/antibiotics12101548
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Time-kill curves (TKCs) are more informative compared with the use of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) as they allow the capture of bacterial growth and the development of drug killing rates over time, which allows to compute key pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters. Our study aimed, using a semi-mechanistic mathematical model, to estimate the best pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices (integral AUC/MIC or %fT > MIC) for the prediction of clinical efficacy of veterinary FQs in Staphylococcus pseudintermedius, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli collected from canine pyoderma cases with a focus on the comparison between marbofloxacin and pradofloxacin. Eight TCKs for each bacterial species (4 susceptible and 4 resistant) were analysed in duplicate. The best PK/PD index was fAUC(24)h/MIC in both staphylococci and E. coli. For staphylococci, values of 25-40 h were necessary to achieve a bactericidal effect, whereas the calculated values (25-35 h) for E. coli were lower than those predicting a positive clinical outcome (100-120 h) in murine models. Pradofloxacin showed a higher potency (lower EC50) in comparison with marbofloxacin. However, no difference in terms of a maximal possible pharmacological killing rate (E-max) was observed. Taking into account in vivo exposure at the recommended dosage regimen (3 and 2 mg/kg for pradofloxacin and marbofloxacin, respectively), the overall killing rates (K-drug) computed were also similar in most instances.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Pharmacokinetics and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic integration of marbofloxacin in calf serum, exudate and transudate [J].
Aliabadi, FS ;
Lees, P .
JOURNAL OF VETERINARY PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2002, 25 (03) :161-174
[2]   Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of danofloxacin in serum and tissue fluids of goats following intravenous and intramuscular administration [J].
Aliabadi, FS ;
Lees, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2001, 62 (12) :1979-1989
[3]   Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations [J].
Andrews, JM .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2001, 48 :5-16
[4]  
[Anonymous], Marbocyl® Product Monograph
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2020, CLSI-VET01S, V5th ed.
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2013, CLSI-VET01-A4, V4th ed.
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1999, CLSI-M26-A
[8]   Investigation of In Vitro Susceptibility and Resistance Mechanisms in Skin Pathogens: Perspectives for Fluoroquinolone Therapy in Canine Pyoderma [J].
Azzariti, Stefano ;
Bond, Ross ;
Loeffler, Anette ;
Zendri, Flavia ;
Timofte, Dorina ;
Chang, Yu-Mei ;
Pelligand, Ludovic .
ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2022, 11 (09)
[9]   In vitro killing of canine strains of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius and Escherichia coli by cefazolin, cefovecin, doxycycline and pradofloxacin over a range of bacterial densities [J].
Blondeau, Joseph M. ;
Fitch, Shantelle D. .
VETERINARY DERMATOLOGY, 2020, 31 (03) :187-+
[10]   Comparative in vitro killing of canine strains of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius and Escherichia coli by cefovecin, cefazolin, doxycycline and pradofloxacin [J].
Blondeau, Joseph M. ;
Shebelski, Shantelle D. .
VETERINARY DERMATOLOGY, 2016, 27 (04) :267-E63