Conflict management-based consensus reaching process considering conflict relationship clustering in large-scale group decision-making problems

被引:18
作者
Ding, Ru-Xi [1 ]
Cheng, Ruo-Xing [2 ]
Li, Meng-Nan [2 ]
Yang, Guo-Rui [2 ]
Herrera-Viedma, Enrique [3 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Univ, Coll Management & Econ, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Granada, Andalusian Res Inst Data Sci & Computat Intelligen, Dept Comp Sci & AI, Granada 18071, Spain
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Large-scale group decision-making; Conflict management; Conflict relationship clustering; Consensus reaching process; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122095
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In large-scale group decision-making (LSGDM) events, conflicts among decision makers (DMs) usually occur, causing serious damage to the decision-making process. Accurate conflict detection and timely management in LSGDM can improve the efficiency of the consensus reaching process (CRP) and reduce the overall conflict degree. This paper presents a conflict management-based consensus reaching process (CM-CRP) to achieve centralized and efficient management of DMs. In CM-CRP, to further manage the conflict relationships among DMs, a new clustering algorithm is considered where DMs with conflicting opinions are clustered into a subgroup. To improve the accuracy of the management and precisely the portray behaviors of DMs, for a multi-attributes LSGDM event, the confidence of DMs at the attribute level is captured. Further, the dynamic opinion weight operator is proposed in CM-CRP combining the confidence level and conflict degree of DMs, which enables a more accurate measurement of DMs' receptivity to others' opinions. Comparative experiments prove that the proposed CM-CRP outperforms the existing CRP, and several simulations investigate the effect of different factors on the CM-CRP.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY-SETS [J].
ATANASSOV, KT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1986, 20 (01) :87-96
[2]  
Blake RobertR., 1964, The managerial grid
[3]   An efficient consensus reaching framework for large-scale social network group decision making and its application in urban resettlement [J].
Chao, Xiangrui ;
Kou, Gang ;
Peng, Yi ;
Herrera-Viedma, Enrique ;
Herrera, Francisco .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2021, 575 :499-527
[4]   Multiattribute Decision Making Based on Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, PSO Techniques, and Evidential Reasoning Methodology [J].
Chen, Shyi-Ming ;
Chiou, Chu-Han .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2015, 23 (06) :1905-1916
[5]   Large-Scale decision-making: Characterization, taxonomy, challenges and future directions from an Artificial Intelligence and applications perspective [J].
Ding, Ru-Xi ;
Palomares, Ivan ;
Wang, Xueqing ;
Yang, Guo-Rui ;
Liu, Bingsheng ;
Dong, Yucheng ;
Herrera-Viedma, Enrique ;
Herrera, Francisco .
INFORMATION FUSION, 2020, 59 :84-102
[6]   Social network analysis-based conflict relationship investigation and conflict degree-based consensus reaching process for large scale decision making using sparse representation [J].
Ding, Ru-Xi ;
Wang, Xueqing ;
Shang, Kun ;
Herrera, Francisco .
INFORMATION FUSION, 2019, 50 :251-272
[7]   Sparse Representation-Based Intuitionistic Fuzzy Clustering Approach to Find the Group Intra-Relations and Group Leaders for Large-Scale Decision Making [J].
Ding, Ru-Xi ;
Wang, Xueqing ;
Shang, Kun ;
Liu, Bingsheng ;
Herrera, Francisco .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2019, 27 (03) :559-573
[8]   Compressed sensing [J].
Donoho, DL .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, 2006, 52 (04) :1289-1306
[9]   Opinion dynamics model based on the cognitive dissonance: An agent-based simulation [J].
Li, Ke ;
Liang, Haiming ;
Kou, Gang ;
Dong, Yucheng .
INFORMATION FUSION, 2020, 56 :1-14
[10]   A Consensus-Based Multicriteria Group Decision Model for Information Technology Management Committees [J].
Lima, Alberto Sampaio ;
de Souza, Jose Neuman ;
Moura, J. Antao B. ;
da Silva, Igor P. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2018, 65 (02) :276-292