Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Persons Aged 15-64 Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:6
|
作者
Martins, Joao Paulo [1 ,2 ]
Santos, Marlene [1 ,3 ]
Martins, Andre [3 ]
Felgueiras, Miguel [2 ,4 ]
Santos, Rui [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Inst Politecn Porto, Escola Super Saude, Rua Dr Antonio Bernardino Almeida, P-4200072 Porto, Portugal
[2] Univ Lisbon, Fac Ciencias, CEAUL Ctr Estat & Aplicacoes, Campo Grande, P-1749016 Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Inst Politecn Porto, Ctr Invest Saude & Ambiente, Rua Dr Antonio Bernardino Almeida, P-4200072 Porto, Portugal
[4] Inst Politecn Leiria, Escola Super Tecnol & Gestao, Campus 2,Morro Do Lena Alto Do Vieiro,Apartado 416, P-2411901 Leiria, Portugal
关键词
influenza; test-negative design; clinical trials; efficacy; effectiveness; strains; TEST-NEGATIVE DESIGN; LABORATORY-CONFIRMED INFLUENZA; SOUTH-AFRICA; PRIMARY-CARE; OUTPATIENT SETTINGS; ANTIGENIC MATCH; UNITED-STATES; EFFICACY; ADULTS; AUSTRALIA;
D O I
10.3390/vaccines11081322
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Influenza is a respiratory disease caused by the influenza virus, which is highly transmissible in humans. This paper presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and test-negative designs (TNDs) to assess the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of seasonal influenza vaccines (SIVs) in humans aged 15 to 64 years. An electronic search to identify all relevant studies was performed. The outcome measure of interest was VE on laboratory-confirmed influenza (any strain). Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for RCTs and the ROBINS-I tool for TNDs. The search identified a total of 2993 records, but only 123 studies from 73 papers were included in the meta-analysis. Of these studies, 9 were RCTs and 116 were TNDs. The pooled VE was 48% (95% CI: 42-54) for RCTs, 55.4% (95% CI: 43.2-64.9) when there was a match between the vaccine and most prevalent circulating strains and 39.3% (95% CI: 23.5-51.9) otherwise. The TNDs' adjusted VE was equal to 39.9% (95% CI: 31-48), 45.1 (95% CI: 38.7-50.8) when there was a match and 35.1 (95% CI: 29.0-40.7) otherwise. The match between strains included in the vaccine and strains in circulation is the most important factor in the VE. It increases by more than 25% when there is a match with the most prevalent circulating strains. The laboratorial method for confirmation of influenza is a possible source of bias when estimating VE.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Mainland China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yang, Xiaokun
    Zhao, Hongting
    Li, Zhili
    Zhu, Aiqin
    Ren, Minrui
    Geng, Mengjie
    Li, Yu
    Qin, Ying
    Feng, Luzhao
    Peng, Zhibin
    An, Zhijie
    Zheng, Jiandong
    Li, Zhongjie
    Feng, Zijian
    VACCINES, 2021, 9 (02) : 1 - 13
  • [22] Efficacy and effectiveness of high-dose influenza vaccine in older adults by circulating strain and antigenic match: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lee, Jason K. H.
    Lam, Gary K. L.
    Shin, Thomas
    Samson, Sandrine, I
    Greenberg, David P.
    Chit, Ayman
    VACCINE, 2021, 39 : A24 - A35
  • [23] Live-Attenuated Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Children From 2009 to 2015-2016: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Gaspard, Nerve
    Mallory, Raburn M.
    Yu, Jing
    Ambrose, Christopher S.
    OPEN FORUM INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2017, 4 (03):
  • [24] Vaccines for the prevention of seasonal influenza in patients with diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Remschmidt, Cornelius
    Wichmann, Ole
    Harder, Thomas
    BMC MEDICINE, 2015, 13
  • [25] The impact of repeated vaccination on influenza vaccine effectiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lauren C. Ramsay
    Sarah A. Buchan
    Robert G. Stirling
    Benjamin J. Cowling
    Shuo Feng
    Jeffrey C. Kwong
    Bryna F. Warshawsky
    BMC Medicine, 17
  • [26] Influenza Vaccine Efficacy and Effectiveness in Pregnant Women: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Trang Ho Thu Quach
    Nicholas Alexander Mallis
    José F. Cordero
    Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2020, 24 : 229 - 240
  • [27] Variable influenza vaccine effectiveness by subtype: a systematic review and meta-analysis of test-negative design studies
    Belongia, Edward A.
    Simpson, Melissa D.
    King, Jennifer P.
    Sundaram, Maria E.
    Kelley, Nicholas S.
    Osterholm, Michael T.
    McLean, Huong Q.
    LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2016, 16 (08) : 942 - 951
  • [28] Efficacy and effectiveness of seasonal and pandemic A (HI NI) 2009 influenza vaccines in low and middle income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Breteler, Janna K.
    Tam, John S.
    Jit, Mark
    Ket, Johannes C. F.
    De Boer, Michiel R.
    VACCINE, 2013, 31 (45) : 5168 - 5177
  • [29] Determinants of Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Uptake Among the Elderly in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Okoli, George N.
    Abou-Setta, Ahmed M.
    Neilson, Christine J.
    Chit, Ayman
    Thommes, Edward
    Mahmud, Salaheddin M.
    GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRIC MEDICINE, 2019, 5
  • [30] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Seasonal Influenza Vaccination of Health Workers
    Li, Tingting
    Qi, Xiaoling
    Li, Qin
    Tang, Wenge
    Su, Kun
    Jia, Mengmeng
    Yang, Weizhong
    Xia, Yu
    Xiong, Yu
    Qi, Li
    Feng, Luzhao
    VACCINES, 2021, 9 (10)