Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Persons Aged 15-64 Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:6
|
作者
Martins, Joao Paulo [1 ,2 ]
Santos, Marlene [1 ,3 ]
Martins, Andre [3 ]
Felgueiras, Miguel [2 ,4 ]
Santos, Rui [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Inst Politecn Porto, Escola Super Saude, Rua Dr Antonio Bernardino Almeida, P-4200072 Porto, Portugal
[2] Univ Lisbon, Fac Ciencias, CEAUL Ctr Estat & Aplicacoes, Campo Grande, P-1749016 Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Inst Politecn Porto, Ctr Invest Saude & Ambiente, Rua Dr Antonio Bernardino Almeida, P-4200072 Porto, Portugal
[4] Inst Politecn Leiria, Escola Super Tecnol & Gestao, Campus 2,Morro Do Lena Alto Do Vieiro,Apartado 416, P-2411901 Leiria, Portugal
关键词
influenza; test-negative design; clinical trials; efficacy; effectiveness; strains; TEST-NEGATIVE DESIGN; LABORATORY-CONFIRMED INFLUENZA; SOUTH-AFRICA; PRIMARY-CARE; OUTPATIENT SETTINGS; ANTIGENIC MATCH; UNITED-STATES; EFFICACY; ADULTS; AUSTRALIA;
D O I
10.3390/vaccines11081322
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Influenza is a respiratory disease caused by the influenza virus, which is highly transmissible in humans. This paper presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and test-negative designs (TNDs) to assess the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of seasonal influenza vaccines (SIVs) in humans aged 15 to 64 years. An electronic search to identify all relevant studies was performed. The outcome measure of interest was VE on laboratory-confirmed influenza (any strain). Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for RCTs and the ROBINS-I tool for TNDs. The search identified a total of 2993 records, but only 123 studies from 73 papers were included in the meta-analysis. Of these studies, 9 were RCTs and 116 were TNDs. The pooled VE was 48% (95% CI: 42-54) for RCTs, 55.4% (95% CI: 43.2-64.9) when there was a match between the vaccine and most prevalent circulating strains and 39.3% (95% CI: 23.5-51.9) otherwise. The TNDs' adjusted VE was equal to 39.9% (95% CI: 31-48), 45.1 (95% CI: 38.7-50.8) when there was a match and 35.1 (95% CI: 29.0-40.7) otherwise. The match between strains included in the vaccine and strains in circulation is the most important factor in the VE. It increases by more than 25% when there is a match with the most prevalent circulating strains. The laboratorial method for confirmation of influenza is a possible source of bias when estimating VE.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccines in children - a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Luksic, Ivana
    Clay, Sarah
    Falconer, Rachel
    Pulanic, Drazen
    Rudan, Igor
    Campbell, Harry
    Nair, Harish
    CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 54 (02) : 135 - 145
  • [12] Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccines in Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Vasileiou, Eleftheria
    Sheikh, Aziz
    Butler, Chris
    El Ferkh, Karim
    von Wissmann, Beatrix
    McMenamin, Jim
    Ritchie, Lewis
    Schwarze, Jurgen
    Papadopoulos, Nikolaos G.
    Johnstone, Sebastian L.
    Tian, Lilly
    Simpson, Cohn R.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2017, 65 (08) : 1388 - 1395
  • [13] Trivalent and quadrivalent seasonal influenza vaccine in adults aged 60 and older: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Veroniki, Areti Angeliki
    Thirugnanasampanthar, Sai Surabi
    Konstantinidis, Menelaos
    Dourka, Jasmeen
    Ghassemi, Marco
    Neupane, Dipika
    Khan, Paul
    Nincic, Vera
    Corry, Margarita
    Robson, Reid
    Parker, Amanda
    Soobiah, Charlene
    Sinilaite, Angela
    Doyon-Plourde, Pamela
    Gil, Anabel
    Siu, Winnie
    Moqueet, Nasheed
    Stevens, Adrienne
    English, Kelly
    Florez, Ivan D.
    Yepes-Nunez, Juan J.
    Hutton, Brian
    Muller, Matthew
    Moja, Lorenzo
    Straus, Sharon
    Tricco, Andrea C.
    BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2024, 29 (04) : 239 - 254
  • [14] Effectiveness of Cell-Based Quadrivalent Seasonal Influenza Vaccine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Coleman, Brenda L.
    Gutmanis, Iris
    Mcgovern, Ian
    Haag, Mendel
    VACCINES, 2023, 11 (10)
  • [15] Influenza Vaccine Efficacy and Effectiveness in Pregnant Women: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Quach Trang Ho Thu
    Mallis, Nicholas Alexander
    Cordero, Jose F.
    MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2020, 24 (02) : 229 - 240
  • [16] Real-world effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccination and age as effect modifier: A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of test-negative design studies
    Guo, Jinxin
    Chen, Xin
    Guo, Yu
    Liu, Mengze
    Li, Pei
    Tao, Yiming
    Liu, Zhike
    Yang, Zhirong
    Zhan, Siyan
    Sun, Feng
    VACCINE, 2024, 42 (08) : 1883 - 1891
  • [17] High-dose influenza vaccine in older adults by age and seasonal characteristics: Systematic review and meta-analysis update
    Lee, Jason K. H.
    Lam, Gary K. L.
    Yin, J. Kevin
    Loiacono, Matthew M.
    Samson, Sandrine I.
    VACCINE: X, 2023, 14
  • [18] Does repeated influenza vaccination attenuate effectiveness? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jones-Gray, Elenor
    Robinson, Elizabeth J.
    Kucharski, Adam J.
    Fox, Annette
    Sullivan, Sheena G.
    LANCET RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2023, 11 (01) : 27 - 44
  • [19] Epidemiology and burden of illness of seasonal influenza among the elderly in Japan: A systematic literature review and vaccine effectiveness meta-analysis
    Taniguchi, Kiyosu
    Ikeda, Shunya
    Hagiwara, Yuriko
    Tsuzuki, Daisuke
    Klai, Marwa
    Sakai, Yoko
    Crawford, Bruce
    Nealon, Joshua
    INFLUENZA AND OTHER RESPIRATORY VIRUSES, 2021, 15 (02) : 293 - 314
  • [20] Variable seasonal influenza vaccine effectiveness across geographical regions, age groups and levels of vaccine antigenic similarity with circulating virus strains: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence from test-negative design studies after the 2009/10 influenza pandemic
    Okoli, G. N.
    Racovitan, F.
    Abdulwahid, T.
    Righolt, C. H.
    Mahmud, S. M.
    VACCINE, 2021, 39 (08) : 1225 - 1240