Significant Reduction in Length of Stay in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction With Implementation of Multimodal ERAS Protocol

被引:9
作者
Araya, Sthefano [1 ,5 ]
Webster, Theresa K. K. [2 ]
Egleston, Brian [3 ]
Amadio, Grace M. M. [2 ]
Panichella, Juliet C. C. [2 ]
Elmer, Nicholas A. A. [4 ]
Patel, Sameer A. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[2] Temple Univ, Lewis Katz Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Biostat & Bioinformat Facil, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[4] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Sidney Kimmel Med Coll, Philadelphia, PA USA
[5] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, 333 Cottman Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
关键词
ERAS; length of stay; breast reconstruction; autologous reconstruction; ENHANCED RECOVERY; STANDARD; PATHWAY; CARE;
D O I
10.1097/SAP.0000000000003578
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundEnhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) implementation achieves earlier recovery, reduced hospital length of stay (LOS) and improved outcomes in patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) free flaps. We sought to review our ERAS protocols and their impact on our patients' LOS compared with the literature.MethodsThis was a retrospective review of a single surgeon's experience from 2017 to 2021 of patients undergoing DIEP free-flap breast reconstruction with LOS as the primary outcome. Complication rates and patient demographics are described as secondary outcomes.ResultsOne hundred twenty-one patients underwent DIEP free-flap breast reconstruction. After adapting ERAS protocols, there has been a 0.98 [SD, 0.17; confidence interval [CI], -1.3 to -0.64; P < 0.001) day decrease in length of stay comparing pre-ERAS to post-ERAS implementation. Length of stay has routinely decreased from an average discharge on day 4.17 (SD, 1.1; range, 3-8 days) in 2017 to discharge on day 2.91 (SD, 1.1; range, 1-5 days) in 2021. Seventy-five percent of patients in 2021 were hospitalized for 3 or fewer days compared with 75% of patients in 2017 hospitalized for 4 or more days. One patient experienced a flap failure. Our study supports successful discharge on postoperative days 2-3 compared with postoperative days 3-4 in the current literature.ConclusionsThe implementation of our ERAS protocol for DIEP free-flap breast reconstruction has resulted in a shorter LOS compared with contemporary literature. The ERAS protocols can be efficiently adopted in microsurgical DIEP breast reconstruction to achieve a shorter LOS without jeopardizing patient outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:90 / 95
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Is Enhanced Recovery the New Standard of Care in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction?
    Afonso, Anoushka
    Oskar, Sabine
    Tan, Kay See
    Disa, Joseph J.
    Mehrara, Babak J.
    Ceyhan, Jihan
    Dayan, Joseph H.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 139 (05) : 1053 - 1061
  • [2] An Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Pathway for Microvascular Breast Reconstruction Is Safe and Effective
    Astanehe, Arezoo
    Temple-Oberle, Claire
    Nielsen, Markus
    de Haas, William
    Lindsay, Robert
    Matthews, Jennifer
    McKenzie, David C.
    Yeung, Justin
    Schrag, Christiaan
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2018, 6 (01)
  • [3] Early Discontinuation of Breast Free Flap Monitoring: A Strategy Driven by National Data
    Baltodano, Pablo A.
    Schalet, Grant
    Rezak, Kristen
    Aliu, Oluseyi
    Weinberg, Maxene
    Ata, Ashar
    Agag, Richard L.
    Patel, Ashit
    Ricci, Joseph A.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 146 (03) : 258E - 264E
  • [4] Long-term results of a standardized enhanced recovery protocol in unilateral, secondary autologous breast reconstructions using an abdominal free flap
    Bonde, Christian T.
    Hojvig, Jens B.
    Jensen, Lisa T.
    Wolthers, Mette
    Sarmady, Faranak N.
    Andersen, Kenneth G.
    Kehlet, Henrik
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2022, 75 (03) : 1117 - 1122
  • [5] Inpatient Flap Monitoring after Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction: How Long Is Long Enough? *
    Carruthers, Katherine H.
    Tiwari, Pankaj
    Yoshida, Shunsuke
    Kocak, Ergun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2019, 35 (09) : 682 - 687
  • [6] Comprehensive Evaluation of Risk Factors and Management of Impending Flap Loss in 2138 Breast Free Flaps
    Chang, Edward I.
    Chang, Eric I.
    Soto-Miranda, Miguel A.
    Zhang, Hong
    Nosrati, Naveed
    Crosby, Melissa A.
    Reece, Gregory P.
    Robb, Geoffrey L.
    Chang, David W.
    [J]. ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2016, 77 (01) : 67 - 71
  • [7] Reducing Length of Stay after Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction with a Standardized Postoperative Protocol
    DelMauro, Matthew A.
    Chen, Kevin
    Keller, Alex
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2019, 35 (08) : 557 - 567
  • [8] National Trends in Length of Stay for Microvascular Breast Reconstruction: An Evaluation of 10,465 Cases Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database
    Holoyda, Kathleen A.
    Magno-Padron, David A.
    Carter, Gentry C.
    Agarwal, Jay P.
    Kwok, Alvin C.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 149 (02) : 306 - 313
  • [9] A Simplified Cost-Utility Analysis of Inpatient Flap Monitoring after Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction and Implications for Hospital Length of Stay
    Jablonka, Eric M.
    Lamelas, Andreas M.
    Kanchwala, Suhail K.
    Rhemtulla, Irfan
    Smith, Mark L.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 144 (04) : 540E - 549E
  • [10] Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks with Single-Dose Liposomal Bupivacaine in Conjunction with a Nonnarcotic Pain Regimen Help Reduce Length of Stay following Abdominally Based Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction
    Jablonka, Eric M.
    Lamelas, Andreas M.
    Kim, Julie N.
    Molina, Bianca
    Molina, Nathan
    Okwali, Michelle
    Samson, William
    Sultan, Mark R.
    Dayan, Joseph H.
    Smith, Mark L.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 140 (02) : 240 - 251