Reconceptualising innovation failure

被引:23
作者
Baxter, David [1 ]
Trott, Paul [2 ]
Ellwood, Paul [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Southampton, England
[2] Univ Portsmouth, Portsmouth, England
[3] Univ Liverpool, Liverpool, England
关键词
Innovation failure; Systematic literature review; ORGANIZATIONAL KNOWLEDGE-CREATION; PROJECT; PERFORMANCE; TECHNOLOGY; DETERMINANTS; PERSPECTIVE; COOPERATION; MANAGEMENT; DIFFUSION; RESOURCES;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2023.104811
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This study examines the concept of innovation failure. It is a problematic subject without an accepted definition. For different stakeholders the same innovation can be both a success and a failure at the same time. The academic literature has concentrated on the determinants of innovation success. Yet, there is a notable lack of academic literature that deals with innovation failure as a topic in its own right. As a result, there is limited attention to, and little consensus on, the meaning of innovation failure. Existing definitions imply a highly contingent con-ceptualisation of innovation failure informed by the different theoretical framings and disciplinary interests of the researchers. We adopt a systematic literature review methodology that examines the concept of innovation failure at the level of the firm and from an innovation management perspective. The findings of this review are based on a total of 69 peer-reviewed articles from 1977 to 2021. We find the concept is widely used yet poorly defined and frequently lacks any theoretical underpinning. By means of a theory-building inductive synthesis our findings contribute to research by reconceptualising the concept of innovation failure along three processual dimensions: failure-as -experimentation; -judgement and -event.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 120 条
  • [1] Shades of Grey: Guidelines for Working with the Grey Literature in Systematic Reviews for Management and Organizational Studies
    Adams, Richard J.
    Smart, Palie
    Huff, Anne Sigismund
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2017, 19 (04) : 432 - 454
  • [2] Feedback Loops as Dynamic Processes of Organizational Knowledge Creation in the Context of the Innovations' Front-end
    Akbar, Hammad
    Baruch, Yehuda
    Tzokas, Nikolaos
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2018, 29 (03) : 445 - 463
  • [3] Charting the organisational knowledge-creation process: An innovation-process perspective
    Akbar, Hammad
    Tzokas, Nikolaos
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2013, 29 (13-14) : 1592 - 1608
  • [4] The Startup Cartography Project: Measuring and mapping entrepreneurial ecosystems
    Andrews, R. J.
    Fazio, Catherine
    Guzman, Jorge
    Liu, Yupeng
    Stern, Scott
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2022, 51 (02)
  • [5] Computational Literature Reviews: Method, Algorithms, and Roadmap
    Antons, David
    Breidbach, Christoph F.
    Joshi, Amol M.
    Salge, Torsten Oliver
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2023, 26 (01) : 107 - 138
  • [6] THE ECONOMIC-IMPLICATIONS OF LEARNING BY DOING
    ARROW, KJ
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1962, 29 (80) : 155 - 173
  • [7] Banyte J, 2008, INZ EKON, P48
  • [8] Too much of a good thing? Product proliferation and organizational failure
    Barnett, WP
    Freeman, J
    [J]. ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2001, 12 (05) : 539 - 558
  • [9] FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
    BARNEY, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (01) : 99 - 120
  • [10] The Role of Narratives in Sustaining Organizational Innovation
    Bartel, Caroline A.
    Garud, Raghu
    [J]. ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (01) : 107 - 117