The impact of the pitching research framework on AFAANZ grant applications

被引:1
作者
Gill, Chelsea [1 ]
Mehrotra, Vishal [1 ]
Moses, Olayinka [2 ]
Bui, Binh [3 ]
机构
[1] Bond Univ, 14 Univ Dr, Robina, Qld 4226, Australia
[2] Victoria Univ Wellington, POB 600, Wellington 6140, New Zealand
[3] Macquarie Univ, Balaclava Rd, Macquarie Pk, NSW 2109, Australia
关键词
Research grants; Grant assessors; Grant applicants; AFAANZ; Pitching research; PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY; WASTE; METHODOLATRY; TEMPLATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.pacfin.2022.101933
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Grant applications are notoriously difficult and time-consuming. Templates are considered by some as a means to expedite and streamline grant applications, potentially resulting in a less onerous and more efficient process. Since 2015, AFAANZ has led the way by adopting the Pitching Research Framework to structure grant applications. However, empirical evidence is needed to better understand the effectiveness and value of this approach both for grant applicant (s) as well as grant assessor(s). This project seeks to explore the extent to which the Pitching Research Framework (PRF) helps PhD scholars (PhDs), Early Career Researchers (ECRs) and Mid -Career Researchers (MCRs) to develop and submit grant applications to AFAANZ. As this paper is a pre-registered report for the Pacific Basin Finance Journal (PBFJ), the details of the project plan are presented, though with no findings as data collection has not yet commenced. By investigating perceptions of both successful and unsuccessful AFAANZ grant applicants, this project will pro-vide insights into the utility of the PRF in grant submissions. It also aims to explore the efficacy and value of the PRF for AFAANZ grant assessors in efficiently and effectively assessing appli-cations. Thus the project aims to deliver valuable empirical insights into the overall effectiveness of the AFAANZ grants process and the role of the PRF within it.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [1] Concentration or dispersal of research funding?
    Aagaard, Kaare
    Kladakis, Alexander
    Nielsen, Mathias W.
    [J]. QUANTITATIVE SCIENCE STUDIES, 2020, 1 (01): : 117 - 149
  • [2] Peer Review of Grant Applications: Criteria Used and Qualitative Study of Reviewer Practices
    Abdoul, Hendy
    Perrey, Christophe
    Amiel, Philippe
    Tubach, Florence
    Gottot, Serge
    Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle
    Alberti, Corinne
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (09):
  • [3] AHRENS T., 2008, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, V19, P840, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.CPA.2006.07.005
  • [4] The impact of public research contracts on scientific productivity
    Alonso-Borrego, Cesar
    Romero-Medina, Antonio
    Sanchez-Mangas, Rocio
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2017, 49 (05) : 417 - 432
  • [5] To discard or to ado(a)pt? Looking at qualitative research templates through the lens of organizational routines
    Balachandran Nair, Lakshmi
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN ORGANIZATIONS AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 16 (02): : 409 - 423
  • [6] Streamlined research funding using short proposals and accelerated peer review: an observational study
    Barnett, Adrian G.
    Herbert, Danielle L.
    Campbell, Megan
    Daly, Naomi
    Roberts, Jason A.
    Mudge, Alison
    Graves, Nicholas
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2015, 15
  • [7] The predictive validity of peer review: A selective review of the judgmental forecasting qualities of peers, and implications for innovation in science
    Benda, Wim G. G.
    Engels, Tim C. E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2011, 27 (01) : 166 - 182
  • [8] The troubles with peer review for allocating research funding Funders need to experiment with versions of peer review and decision-making
    Bendiscioli, Sandra
    [J]. EMBO REPORTS, 2019, 20 (12)
  • [9] Bisman J, 2010, AUSTRALAS ACCOUNT BU, V4, P3
  • [10] Developing a methodology to assess the impact of research grant funding: A mixed methods approach
    Bloch, Carter
    Sorensen, Mads P.
    Graversen, Ebbe K.
    Schneider, Jesper W.
    Schmidt, Evanthia Kalpazidou
    Aagaard, Kaare
    Mejlgaard, Niels
    [J]. EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 2014, 43 : 105 - 117