Lessons Learned for AI Education with Elementary Students and Teachers

被引:32
作者
Ottenbreit-Leftwich, Anne [1 ]
Glazewski, Krista [1 ]
Jeon, Minji [1 ]
Jantaraweragul, Katie [1 ]
Hmelo-Silver, Cindy E. [1 ]
Scribner, Adam [1 ]
Lee, Seung [2 ]
Mott, Bradford [2 ]
Lester, James [2 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[2] North Carolina State Univ, Raleigh, NC USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
K-12 AI education; AI Ethics; Elementary Education; Teacher co-design; COMPUTATIONAL THINKING; SCIENCE-EDUCATION; KNOWLEDGE; CURRICULUM; VISION;
D O I
10.1007/s40593-022-00304-3
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
With accelerating advances in artificial intelligence, it is clear that introducing K-12 students to AI is essential for preparation to interact with and potentially develop AI technologies. To succeed as the workers, creators, and innovators of the future, we argue students should encounter core concepts of AI as early as elementary school. However, building a curriculum that introduces AI content to K-12 students presents significant challenges, such as connecting to prior knowledge, developing curricula that are meaningful for students, and creating content that teachers feel confident to teach. To lay the groundwork for elementary AI education, we investigated the everyday experiences and ideas of students in grades 4 and 5 (ages 9 to 11) about AI to inform possible entry points for learning. This yielded themes around student conceptions, examples, and ethics of AI. For each theme, we juxtapose the student ideas with the teachers' reflections on those ideas as frames of reference to consider in co-designing curricular approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 289
页数:23
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, TAKING SCI SCH, DOI DOI 10.17226/11625
[2]   Change in teachers' knowledge of subject matter: A 17-year longitudinal study [J].
Arzi, Hanna J. ;
White, Richard T. .
SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2008, 92 (02) :221-251
[3]  
Caixiong Z., 2019, CHINADAILY
[4]  
Creswell J. W., 2012, Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating, V4th ed.
[5]   Training teachers to use new technologies impacts multiple ecologies: Evidence from a national initiative [J].
Davis, Niki ;
Preston, Christina ;
Sahin, Ismail .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 40 (05) :861-878
[6]   The Construction of Causal Schemes: Learning Mechanisms at the Knowledge Level [J].
diSessa, Andrea A. .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2014, 38 (05) :795-850
[7]   Science Learning Progressions [J].
Duncan, Ravit Golan ;
Rivet, Ann E. .
SCIENCE, 2013, 339 (6118) :396-397
[8]  
Eisenhart M., 2005, Educational Researcher, V34, P3, DOI [DOI 10.3102/0013189X034004003, 10.3102/0013189X034002003, DOI 10.3102/0013189X034002003, 10.3102/0013189X034004003]
[9]   Co-constructing Professional Vision: Teacher and Researcher Learning in Co-Design [J].
Gomoll, Andrea ;
Hmelo-Silver, Cindy E. ;
Sabanovic, Selma .
COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION, 2022, 40 (01) :7-26
[10]   Primary teachers' understanding of concepts of science: Impact on confidence and teaching [J].
Harlen, W ;
Holroyd, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 1997, 19 (01) :93-105