Machine learning for prediction of concurrent endometrial carcinoma in patients diagnosed with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia

被引:4
作者
Levin, Gabriel [1 ]
Matanes, Emad [1 ]
Brezinov, Yoav [2 ]
Ferenczy, Alex [3 ]
Pelmus, Manuela [3 ]
Brodeur, Melica Nourmoussavi [1 ]
Salvador, Shannon [1 ]
Lau, Susie [1 ]
Gotlieb, Walter H. [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Jewish Gen Hosp, Div Gynecol Oncol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Segal Canc Ctr, Lady Davis Inst Med Res, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Jewish Gen Hosp, Segal Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, Montreal, PQ H3T 1E2, Canada
来源
EJSO | 2024年 / 50卷 / 03期
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Endometrial cancer; Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia; Machine learning; Prediction models; WOMEN; BIOPSY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108006
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To identify predictive clinico-pathologic factors for concurrent endometrial carcinoma (EC) among patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) using machine learning. Methods: a retrospective analysis of 160 patients with a biopsy proven EIN. We analyzed the performance of multiple machine learning models (n = 48) with different parameters to predict the diagnosis of postoperative EC. The prediction variables included: parity, gestations, sampling method, endometrial thickness, age, body mass index, diabetes, hypertension, serum CA-125, preoperative histology and preoperative hormonal therapy. Python 'sklearn' library was used to train and test the models. The model performance was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and AUC. Five iterations of internal cross-validation were performed, and the mean values were used to compare between the models. Results: Of the 160 women with a preoperative diagnosis of EIN, 37.5% (60) had a post-op diagnosis of EC. In univariable analysis, there were no significant predictors of EIN. For the five best machine learning models, all the models had a high specificity (71%-88%) and a low sensitivity (23%-51%). Logistic regression model had the highest specificity 88%, XG Boost had the highest sensitivity 51%, and the highest positive predictive value 62% and negative predictive value 73%. The highest area under the curve was achieved by the random forest model 0.646. Conclusions: Even using the most elaborate AI algorithms, it is not possible currently to predict concurrent EC in women with a preoperative diagnosis of EIN. As women with EIN have a high risk of concurrent EC, there may be a value of surgical staging including sentinel lymph node evaluation, to more precisely direct adjuvant treatment in the event EC is identified on final pathology.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Endometrial stripe thickness: a preoperative marker to identify patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia who may benefit from sentinel lymph node mapping and biopsy
    Abt, Devon
    Macharia, Annliz
    Hacker, Michele R.
    Baig, Rasha
    Esselen, Katharine McKinley
    Ducie, Jennifer
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2022, 32 (09) : 1091 - 1097
  • [2] Hysterectomy with a general gynecologist vs gynecologic-oncologist in the setting of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Chaiken, Sarina R.
    Bohn, Jacqueline A.
    Bruegl, Amanda S.
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    Munro, Elizabeth G.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 227 (04)
  • [3] Machine Learning and Prediction in Medicine - Beyond the Peak of Inflated Expectations
    Chen, Jonathan H.
    Asch, Steven M.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 376 (26) : 2507 - 2509
  • [4] Accuracy of outpatient endometrial biopsy in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer: a systematic quantitative review
    Clark, TJ
    Mann, CH
    Shah, N
    Khan, KS
    Song, FJ
    Gupta, JK
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2002, 109 (03) : 313 - 321
  • [5] Uptake and Outcomes of Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Women With Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia
    Dioun, Shayan
    Chen, Ling
    Melamed, Alexander
    Gockley, Allison
    St Clair, Caryn M.
    Hou, June Y.
    Tergas, Ana, I
    Khoury-Collado, Fady
    Hur, Chin
    Hershman, Dawn L.
    Wright, Jason D.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 137 (05) : 924 - 934
  • [6] Concurrent and future risk of endometrial cancer in women with endometrial hyperplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Doherty, Michelle T.
    Sanni, Omolara B.
    Coleman, Helen G.
    Cardwell, Chris R.
    McCluggage, W. Glenn
    Quinn, Declan
    Wylie, James
    McMenamin, Una C.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (04):
  • [7] Is sentinel lymph node assessment useful in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia?
    Matanes, Emad
    Amajoud, Zainab
    Kogan, Liron
    Mitric, Cristina
    Ismail, Sara
    Raban, Oded
    Knigin, David
    Levin, Gabriel
    Bahoric, Boris
    Ferenczy, Alex
    Pelmus, Manuela
    Lecavalier-Barsoum, Magali
    Lau, Susie
    Salvador, Shannon
    Gotlieb, Walter H.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2023, 168 : 107 - 113
  • [8] Prediction of concurrent endometrial carcinoma in women with endometrial hyperplasia
    Matsuo, Koji
    Ramzan, Amin A.
    Gualtieri, Marc R.
    Mhawech-Fauceglia, Paulette
    Machida, Hiroko
    Moeini, Aida
    Dancz, Christina E.
    Ueda, Yutaka
    Roman, Lynda D.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2015, 139 (02) : 261 - 267
  • [9] Theories of endometrial carcinogenesis: A multidisciplinary approach
    Sherman, ME
    [J]. MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2000, 13 (03) : 295 - 308
  • [10] The utility of sentinel lymph node mapping in the management of endometrial atypical hyperplasia
    Touhami, Omar
    Gregoire, Jean
    Renaud, Marie-Claude
    Sebastianelli, Alexandra
    Grondin, Katherine
    Plante, Marie
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 148 (03) : 485 - 490