Complete digital pathology transition: A large multi-center experience

被引:1
作者
Samueli, Benzion [1 ,2 ]
Aizenberg, Natalie [1 ,2 ]
Shaco-Levy, Ruthy [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Katzav, Aviva [4 ]
Kezerle, Yarden [1 ,2 ]
Krausz, Judit [5 ]
Mazareb, Salam [6 ]
Niv-Drori, Hagit [7 ,8 ]
Peled, Hila Belhanes [5 ]
Sabo, Edmond [6 ,9 ]
Tobar, Ana [7 ,8 ]
Asa, Sylvia L. [10 ]
机构
[1] Soroka Univ, Dept Pathol, Med Ctr, POB 151, IL-8410101 Beer Sheva, Israel
[2] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Fac Hlth Sci, POB 653, IL-8410501 Beer Sheva, Israel
[3] Barzilai Govt Hosp, Dept Pathol, 2 Ha Histadrut St, IL-7830604 Ashqelon, Israel
[4] Pathol Inst, Meir Med Ctr, IL-4428164 Kefar Sava, Israel
[5] HaEmek Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, 21 Yitzhak Rabin Ave, IL-183411 Afula, Israel
[6] Carmel Hosp, Dept Pathol, Dept Pediat, 7 Michal St, IL-3436212 Haifa, Israel
[7] Rabin Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, 39 Jabotinsky St, IL-4941492 Petah Tiqwa, Israel
[8] Tel Aviv Univ, Fac Med, POB 39040, IL-6139001 Tel Aviv, Israel
[9] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Rappaport Fac Med, IL-3525433 Haifa, Israel
[10] Case Western Reserve Univ, Univ Hosp Cleveland Med Ctr, Inst Pathol, 11100 Euclid Ave,Room 204, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
Digital pathology; Synoptic reporting; Image management system; Slide scanners; CANCER PATHOLOGY; QUALITY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; DIAGNOSIS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.prp.2023.155028
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Introduction: Transitioning from glass slide pathology to digital pathology for primary diagnostics requires an appropriate laboratory information system, an image management system, and slide scanners; it also reinforces the need for sophisticated pathology informatics including synoptic reporting. Previous reports have discussed the transition itself and relevant considerations for it, but not the selection criteria and considerations for the infrastructure.Objective: To describe the process used to evaluate slide scanners, image management systems, and synoptic reporting systems for a large multisite institution. Methods: Six network hospitals evaluated six slide scanners, three image management systems, and three synoptic reporting systems. Scanners were evaluated based on the quality of image, speed, ease of operation, and special capabilities (including z-stacking, fluorescence and others). Image management and synoptic reporting systems were evaluated for their ease of use and capacity.Results: Among the scanners evaluated, the Leica GT450 produced the highest quality images, while the 3DHistech Pannoramic provided fluorescence and superior z-stacking. The newest generation of scanners, released relatively recently, performed better than slightly older scanners from major manufacturers Although the Olympus VS200 was not fully vetted due to not meeting all inclusion criteria, it is discussed herein due to its exceptional versatility. For Image Management Software, the authors believe that Sectra is, at the time of writing the best developed option, but this could change in the very near future as other systems improve their capabilities. All synoptic reporting systems performed impressively.Conclusions: Specifics regarding quality and abilities of different components will change rapidly with time, but large pathology practices considering such a transition should be aware of the issues discussed and evaluate the most current generation to arrive at appropriate conclusions.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] Abel Jacob T, 2020, J Pathol Inform, V11, P23, DOI 10.4103/jpi.jpi_38_20
  • [2] Abels Esther, 2017, J Pathol Inform, V8, P23, DOI 10.4103/jpi.jpi_11_17
  • [3] Whole slide images as a platform for initial diagnostics in histopathology in a medium-sized routine laboratory
    Al-Janabi, Shaimaa
    Huisman, Andre
    Nap, Marius
    Clarijs, Ruud
    van Diest, Paul J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2012, 65 (12) : 1107 - 1111
  • [4] Amin Waqas, 2008, Expert Opin Med Diagn, V2, P1173, DOI 10.1517/17530059.2.10.1173
  • [5] Complete Digital Pathology for Routine Histopathology Diagnosis in a Multicenter Hospital Network
    Antonio Retamero, Juan
    Aneiros-Fernandez, Jose
    del Moral, Raimundo G.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2020, 144 (02) : 221 - 228
  • [6] Issues to Consider When Implementing Digital Pathology for Primary Diagnosis
    Asa, Sylvia L.
    Evans, Andrew
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2020, 144 (11) : 1297 - 1297
  • [7] Babawale M, 2021, J Pathol Inform, V12, P4, DOI 10.4103/jpi.jpi_55_20
  • [8] The implementation of guidelines and computerised forms improves the completeness of cancer pathology reporting. The CROPS project: a randomised controlled trial in pathology
    Branston, LK
    Greening, S
    Newcombe, RG
    Daoud, R
    Abraham, JM
    Wood, F
    Dallimore, NS
    Steward, J
    Rogers, C
    Williams, GT
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 38 (06) : 764 - 772
  • [9] The virtual microscope
    Çatalyürek, Ü
    Beynon, MD
    Chang, CL
    Kurc, T
    Sussman, A
    Saltz, J
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN BIOMEDICINE, 2003, 7 (04): : 230 - 248
  • [10] A Position Paper on Standardizing the Nonneoplastic Kidney Biopsy Report
    Chang, Anthony
    Gibson, Ian W.
    Cohen, Arthur H.
    Weening, Jan J.
    Jennette, J. Charles
    Fogo, Agnes B.
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2012, 7 (08): : 1365 - 1368