Coping with the heterogeneity of external knowledge sources: Corresponding openness strategies and innovation performance

被引:9
作者
Abdelaty, Hamdy [1 ,2 ]
Weiss, Daniel [2 ]
机构
[1] Cairo Univ, Fac Commerce, Business Adm Dept, Cairo, Egypt
[2] Free Univ Berlin, Dept Business & Econ, Berlin, Germany
来源
JOURNAL OF INNOVATION & KNOWLEDGE | 2023年 / 8卷 / 04期
关键词
Open innovation; Search; Collaboration; Innovation performance; Regression analysis; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; SECTORAL PATTERNS; FIRM PERFORMANCE; MODERATING ROLE; SERVICE SECTOR; SEARCH; IMPACT; COLLABORATION; APPROPRIABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jik.2023.1004232444-569X
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Previous studies on open innovation and strategic management have emphasized the positive impact of external knowledge on firms' innovation performance. However, given that external knowledge is widely distributed across a myriad of heterogeneous sources, it presents challenges for both the openness strategy and knowledge accessibility. When designing a firm's openness strategy, the heterogeneity of these external sources must be considered, choosing a form of openness that aligns with the attributes of the targeted sources. The question remains, which form of openness aligns best with which knowledge source and leads to improved innovation performance? Our regression analysis, based on a sample of 3294 German firms from the Mannheim Innovation Panel (MIP) in 2013 and 2017, reveals that utilizing a search strategy toward market sources of knowledge influences innovation performance more positively than a collaboration strategy. Conversely, only collaboration with science-based sources of knowledge has a significant positive impact on innovation performance. We further delve into the implications of these observed results and describe the practical implications for innovation managers.(c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. on behalf of Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]   R&D capacity and the innovation collaboration paradox: the moderating role of the appropriation strategy [J].
Abdelaty, Hamdy ;
Weiss, Daniel .
INNOVATION-ORGANIZATION & MANAGEMENT, 2021, :111-128
[2]   Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study [J].
Ahuja, G ;
Katila, R .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2001, 22 (03) :197-220
[3]  
Arora A., 2001, Industrial and corporate change, V10, P419, DOI DOI 10.1093/ICC/10.2.419
[4]   External Knowledge Sourcing and Firm Innovation Efficiency [J].
Asimakopoulos, Grigorios ;
Revilla, Antonio J. ;
Slavova, Kremena .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2020, 31 (01) :123-140
[5]   Cooperative R&D and firm performance [J].
Belderbos, R ;
Carree, M ;
Lokshin, B .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2004, 33 (10) :1477-1492
[6]   Inter-temporal patterns of R&D collaboration and innovative performance [J].
Belderbos, Ren ;
Carree, Martin ;
Lokshin, Boris ;
Fernandez Sastre, Juan .
JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2015, 40 (01) :123-137
[7]   Towards an open R&D system: Internal R&D investment, external knowledge acquisition and innovative performance [J].
Berchicci, Luca .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2013, 42 (01) :117-127
[8]   Knowledge spillovers, R&D partnerships and innovation performance [J].
Bernal, Pilar ;
Carree, Martin ;
Lokshin, Boris .
TECHNOVATION, 2022, 115
[9]   Accelerating Innovation With Generative AI: AI-Augmented Digital Prototyping and Innovation Methods [J].
Bilgram V. ;
Laarmann F. .
IEEE Engineering Management Review, 2023, 51 (02) :18-25
[10]   Strategic Management of Open Innovation: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective [J].
Bogers, Marcel ;
Chesbrough, Henry ;
Heaton, Sohvi ;
Teece, David J. .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2019, 62 (01) :77-94