The effect of optimum, indication-specific imaging fields on the radiation exposure from CBCT examinations of impacted maxillary canines and mandibular third molars

被引:1
作者
Ilo, Anne-Mari [1 ]
Waltimo-Siren, Janna [2 ,3 ]
Esmaeili, Elmira Pakbaznejad [4 ]
Ekholm, Marja [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Kortesniemi, Mika [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turku, Inst Dent, Dept Oral Pathol & Oral Radiol, Lemminkaisenkatu 2, FI-20014 Turku, Finland
[2] Univ Turku, Inst Dent, Dept Pediat Dent & Orthodont, Turku, Finland
[3] Wellbeing Serv Cty South West Finland, Turku, Finland
[4] Univ Helsinki, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Dis, Helsinki, Finland
[5] Univ Helsinki, Helsinki Univ Hosp, Helsinki, Finland
[6] Helsinki Univ Hosp, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
Cone-beam computed tomography; radiation exposure; impacted; cuspid; molar; third; BEAM COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; CT; DENTISTRY; DOSIMETRY; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1080/00016357.2023.2258981
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective Indication-specific optimum field-of-views (FOVs) have been assessed for CBCT scans of impacted maxillary canines and mandibular third molars, as 40 null x 35 mm and 35 null x 35 mm, respectively. The objective was to investigate possible changes in absorbed organs and effective doses, for these two imaging indications, performing CBCT examinations with optimum FOV sizes instead of commonly used FOVs. Additionally, radiation exposure-induced cancer risk was calculated for both imaging indications with optimum FOVs.Methods An adult female head phantom (ATOM 702-D, CIRS, Norfolk, VA, USA) was scanned using Planmeca Viso G7 CBCT-device (Planmeca, Helsinki, Finland). Scanning factors, different FOV sizes, dose-area product (DAP) values and anatomical FOV locations were used for Monte Carlo PCXMC-simulation and ImpactMC software. In the PCXMC- simulation, 10-year-old child and 30-year-old adult phantoms were used to estimating effective and absorbed organ doses.Results The effective dose varied from 58 mu Sv to 284 mu Sv for impacted maxillary canines, and from 38 mu Sv to 122 mu Sv for mandibular third molars, the lowest dose value for each corresponding to optimum FOV. Effective dose reduction between the optimum FOV and the smallest common FOV of 50 null x 50 mm, maintaining other scanning factors constant, was 33% for impacted maxillary canines, and 45% for mandibular third molars. At all examinations, the highest absorbed organ doses were in salivary glands or in oral mucosa.Conclusions Optimum FOVs, 40 null x 35 mm for impacted maxillary canine and 35 null x 35 mm for mandibular third molar, could decrease effective doses received by young patients, and improve radiation safety in these common CBCT imaging procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 73
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Organ dose and radiogenic risk in dental cone-beam computed tomography examinations [J].
Almuqrin, Aljawhara H. ;
Tamam, Nissren ;
Abdelrazig, A. ;
Elnour, A. ;
Sulieman, Abdelmoneim .
RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2020, 176
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, J ICRU, V5, P2
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, PCXMC 2.0: user's Guide
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, SEDENTEXCT RAD PROT
[6]   Maxillary incisor root resorption induced by ectopic canines A follow-up study, 13 to 28 years posttreatment [J].
Bjerklin, Krister ;
Guitirokh, Chanelle Houmet .
ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2011, 81 (05) :800-806
[7]   Measuring absorbed dose for i-CAT CBCT examinations in child, adolescent and adult phantoms [J].
Choi, E. ;
Ford, N. L. .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2015, 44 (06)
[8]   CBCT-based volume of simulated root resorption - influence of FOV and voxel size [J].
Da Silveira, P. F. ;
Fontana, M. P. ;
Oliveira, H. W. ;
Vizzotto, M. B. ;
Montagner, F. ;
Silveira, H. L. ;
Silveira, H. E. .
INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2015, 48 (10) :959-965
[9]   Minimum size and positioning of imaging field for CBCT scans of impacted maxillary canines [J].
Esmaeili, Elmira Pakbaznejad ;
Ilo, Anne-Mari ;
Waltimo-Siren, Janna ;
Ekholm, Marja .
CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2020, 24 (02) :897-905
[10]   APPROPRIATE USE OF EFFECTIVE DOSE IN RADIATION PROTECTION AND RISK ASSESSMENT [J].
Fisher, Darrell R. ;
Fahey, Frederic H. .
HEALTH PHYSICS, 2017, 113 (02) :102-109