Psychometric Properties and Measurement Invariance of the Positive Youth Development Scale - Turkish Version

被引:3
作者
Yildirim, Sinan [1 ,2 ]
Arslan, Yunus [1 ]
机构
[1] Pamukkale Univ, Fac Sport Sci, Denizli, Turkiye
[2] Pamukkale Univ, Fac Sport Sci, Kinikli Kampusu Oda 0011, TR-20160 Pamukkale, Denizli, Turkiye
关键词
psychometric properties; reliability; validity; development; youth; Turkish; positive development scale; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS; 5; CS; LONGITUDINAL ANALYSIS; SPORT; RECOMMENDATIONS; PROGRAMS; LISREL;
D O I
10.1177/00315125231206311
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In this study, we translated to Turkish and evaluated the validity, reliability, and measurement invariance for respondent sex, grade level and analysis programs the Short Form and Very Short Form of the Positive Youth Development Scale (Turkish version). We had 435 youth, aged 11-17 years, complete the Short (34 items) and Very Short (17 items) Forms of the instrument. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that both forms had a 5-factor structure, and validity testing showed good criterion-related correlation validity between this tool and the Satisfaction with Life Scale. The Short Form had adequate reliability coefficients, but the Very Short Form lacked sufficient reliability for some dimensions. Test-retest correlations were satisfactory for both forms. While the Short and Very Short Forms showed measurement invariance across gender and grade level, CFI, NNFI (TLI), and IFI values diverged between LISREL and AMOS analysis programs. In summary, our data suggest that the Short Form is a reliable measure of positive youth development, while the Very Short Form may not be as reliable due to insufficient confidence values.
引用
收藏
页码:2362 / 2387
页数:26
相关论文
共 80 条
[21]   An Evaluation of the Measurement Properties of the Five Cs Model of Positive Youth Development [J].
Conway, Ronan J. ;
Heary, Caroline ;
Hogan, Michael J. .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 6
[22]  
Dagli A., 2016, Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, V15, P1250, DOI DOI 10.17755/ESOSDER.75955
[23]   What is positive youth development? [J].
Damon, W .
ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2004, 591 :13-24
[24]  
Davis MH, 1980, MULTIDIMENSIONAL APP, DOI DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
[25]   THE SATISFACTION WITH LIFE SCALE [J].
DIENER, E ;
EMMONS, RA ;
LARSEN, RJ ;
GRIFFIN, S .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 1985, 49 (01) :71-75
[26]  
Domnguez Espinosa A.D.C., 2021, Handbook of Positive Youth Development: Advancing Research, Policy, and Practice in Global Contexts, P109
[27]   CROSS-CULTURAL-ANALYSIS IN EXERCISE AND SPORT PSYCHOLOGY - A VOID IN THE FIELD [J].
DUDA, JL ;
ALLISON, MT .
JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 12 (02) :114-131
[28]   Factor Structure and Criterion Validity of the Five Cs Model of Positive Youth Development in a Multi-University Sample of College Students [J].
Dvorsky, Melissa R. ;
Kofler, Michael J. ;
Burns, G. Leonard ;
Luebbe, Aaron M. ;
Garner, Annie A. ;
Jarrett, Matthew A. ;
Soto, Elia F. ;
Becker, Stephen P. .
JOURNAL OF YOUTH AND ADOLESCENCE, 2019, 48 (03) :537-553
[29]   The relations of children's dispositional empathy-related responding to their emotionality, regulation, and social functioning [J].
Eisenberg, N ;
Fabes, RA ;
Murphy, B ;
Karbon, M ;
Smith, M ;
Maszk, P .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 32 (02) :195-209
[30]   Lithuanian version of measure of positive youth development based on the Five Cs model [J].
Erentaite, Rasa ;
Raiziene, Saule .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 12 (06) :701-717