Single- versus two-stage reconstruction in patients with head and neck cancer: What are the benefits?

被引:0
|
作者
Rauchenwald, Tina [1 ]
Steinbichler, Teresa B. [2 ,4 ]
Rajsic, Sasa [3 ]
Wolfram, Dolores [1 ]
Prossliner, Harald [3 ]
Riechelmann, Herbert [2 ]
Pierer, Gerhard [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Innsbruck, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Aesthet Surg, Anichstr 35, Innsbruck, Austria
[2] Med Univ Innsbruck, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Anichstr 35, Innsbruck, Austria
[3] Med Univ Innsbruck, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Anichstr 35, Innsbruck, Austria
[4] Med Univ Innsbruck, Anichstr 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
关键词
Head and neck oncology; Head and neck reconstruction; Staged reconstruction; Patient safety; Surgeon fatigue; Mitigation strategies; JOB-SATISFACTION; OPERATING TIME; FREE-FLAP; SURGEONS; CLASSIFICATION; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjps.2023.01.008
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
In head and neck oncology, surgical treatment frequently results in microvascular reconstruction. Oncologic resection followed by immediate reconstruction is often associated with prolonged working and surgical duration, challenging a surgeon's concentration level and potentially worsening patient outcome. To improve the surgeon's performance and to reduce risk of potential complications, we implemented a two-stage procedure in patients with head and neck cancer. This study critically analyzed the surgical outcomes, organizational benefits, and investigated job satisfaction among affected health care professionals. A retrospective data analysis of patients who had undergone microvascular reconstruction after oncologic head and neck surgery between 2010 and 2021 included 33 patients (n = 33). Twenty patients un- derwent single-stage reconstruction (group 1, n = 20) and 13 patients underwent two-stage reconstruction (group 2, n = 13) with 12.2 ( & PLUSMN; 7.4) days between surgeries. The mean surgical duration, and mean start and end time of the reconstructive surgery component differed sig- nificantly (p = 0.002). The mean total complication rate (p = 0.58) did not differ significantly, although a trend toward higher demands for blood products was observed in group 1. There was no significant difference in five-year survival (p = 0.28). A questionnaire on subjective work performance was answered by the affected health care professionals (n = 34) and it revealed that 88% preferred long surgeries to be scheduled first and that 97% work most efficiently in the morning. In conclusion, two-stage reconstruction is a suitable option in selected head and neck cancer patients offering the possibility of optimizing preoperative planning and organization. This may result in regular working hours, reduced surgeon fatigue, and improved job sa- tisfaction without compromising patient outcomes or survival.& COPY; 2023 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creative- commons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 82
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Microsurgical Reconstruction for Head and Neck Cancer in Elderly Patients
    Spyropoulou, Georgia-Alexandra
    Jeng, Seng-Feng
    Hsieh, Ching-Hua
    Tsimponis, Antonis
    Shih, Hsian-Shun
    JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2014, 30 (02) : 91 - 95
  • [2] Single Versus Double Venous Anastomosis Microvascular Free Flaps for Head and Neck Reconstruction
    Boczar, Daniel
    Colon, Ricardo Rodriguez
    Anzai, Lavinia
    Daar, David A.
    Chaya, Bachar F.
    Trilles, Jorge
    Levine, Jamie P.
    Jacobson, Adam S.
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 33 (03) : 784 - 786
  • [3] Surgical reconstruction of pressure ulcers in spinal cord injury individuals: A single- or two-stage approach?
    Braafhart, Marieke
    de Laat, Henricus E. W.
    Wagner, Till
    van de Burgt, Emmy W. T.
    Hummelink, Stefan
    Ulrich, Dietmar J. O.
    JOURNAL OF TISSUE VIABILITY, 2020, 29 (04) : 319 - 323
  • [4] Surgical reconstruction in patients with cancer of the head and neck
    Vural E.
    Current Oncology Reports, 2004, 6 (2) : 133 - 140
  • [5] What is special in patients with head and neck cancer?
    Alt-Epping, B.
    Nauck, F.
    MKG-CHIRURG, 2021, 14 (01): : 29 - 34
  • [6] Dexamethasone in head and neck cancer patients with microvascular reconstruction: No benefit, more complications
    Kainulainen, S.
    Tornwall, J.
    Koivusalo, A. M.
    Suominen, A. L.
    Lassus, P.
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 65 : 45 - 50
  • [7] Myocutaneous flaps in head and neck cancer reconstruction: Experience with 437 cases at a single institution
    Vartanian, JG
    Carvalho, AL
    Carvalho, SMT
    Mizobe, L
    Magrin, J
    Kowalski, LP
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2004, 26 (12): : 1018 - 1023
  • [8] Frailty adversely affects outcome following free-flap reconstruction in patients with head and neck cancer
    Hintze, Justin M.
    Cleere, Eoin
    Timon, Conrad
    Kinsella, John
    Lennon, Paul
    Fitzgerald, Conall
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2025, 102 : 269 - 277
  • [9] Two-stage versus single-stage procedure for the management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis in elderly patients: a retrospectively cohort study
    Zhou, Yong
    Zha, Wen-Zhang
    Fan, Ren-Gen
    Jiang, Guo-qin
    Wu, Xu-dong
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS, 2019, 111 (03) : 176 - 181
  • [10] Single Versus Simultaneous Double Free Flaps for Head and Neck Reconstruction Comparison of Flap Outcomes and Donor-Site Morbidity
    Stalder, Mark W.
    Mundinger, Gerhard S.
    Bartow, Matthew
    Pharo, Austin
    Patterson, Charles
    Sharma, Silpa
    Aslam, Rizwan
    St Hilaire, Hugo
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2019, 82 (02) : 184 - 189