Comparison of a novel mini-oral sulfate tablet and the conventional oral sulfate tablet in bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded, multicenter, non-inferior, phase 3 trial

被引:4
|
作者
Jeon, Seong Ran [1 ]
Park, Soo-Kyung [2 ]
Yang, Dong-Hoon [3 ]
Cha, Jae Myung [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Soonchunhyang Univ, Inst Digest Res, Digest Dis Ctr, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Kangbuk Samsung Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Sch Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Univ Ulsan, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Kyung Hee Univ, Kyung Hee Univ Hosp Gangdong, Dept Internal Med, Div Gastroenterol,Sch Med, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Kyung Hee Univ, Kyung Hee Univ Hosp Gang Dong, Dept Internal Med, Div Gastroenterol,Sch Med, 892 Dongnam Ro, Seoul 05278, South Korea
关键词
Bowel preparation; Colonoscopy; Efficacy; Oral sulfate tablet; Mini-oral sulfate tablet; PLUS POLYETHYLENE-GLYCOL; ELECTROLYTE-SOLUTION; QUALITY; VALIDATION; MORTALITY; EFFICACY; SCALE;
D O I
10.1007/s00535-023-02023-5
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and aims The use of conventional oral sulfate tablets (OSTs) has gained popularity; nonetheless, they may be not only inconvenient to swallow but also difficult to dissolve. A novel mini-OST has recently been developed to enhance compliance with conventional OST use. This study aimed to compare the efficacy, tolerability, and safety between mini-OST and conventional OST. Methods This was a prospective, randomized, investigatorblinded, multicenter, and non-inferior phase 3 trial conducted between September 2022 and December 2022. The efficacy, safety, and tolerability were compared between mini-OST and conventional OST. Results Exactly 83 patients were evaluated based on a full analysis set (FAS), whereas 82 patients were evaluated as a per-protocol set (PPS). With respect to the efficacy of preparation, successful and high-quality preparation was excellent in the mini-OST and conventional OST groups on both FAS and PPS analyses, without significant differences between the two groups. On the FAS analysis, the satisfaction and tolerability scores were high in both groups, without significant differences. The first bowel movement after taking the investigational product occurred 30 min earlier in the mini-OST group than in the OST group. Mild, moderate, and severe adverse events (AEs) were comparable between the two groups; however, any AEs were more common in the mini-OST group than in the conventional OST group overall. Conclusions Compared with conventional OST, the novel mini-OST preparation showed similar efficacy, tolerability, and safety, including mild eight solicited AEs and moderate-to-severe AEs. Clinical trial registration NCT05670470.
引用
收藏
页码:1114 / 1123
页数:10
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Comparison of a novel mini-oral sulfate tablet and the conventional oral sulfate tablet in bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded, multicenter, non-inferior, phase 3 trial
    Seong Ran Jeon
    Soo-Kyung Park
    Dong-Hoon Yang
    Jae Myung Cha
    Journal of Gastroenterology, 2023, 58 : 1114 - 1123
  • [2] Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of oral sulfate tablet versus 2 L-polyethylene glycol/ascorbate for bowel preparation in older patients: prospective, multicenter, investigator single-blinded, randomized study
    Kang, Ho Suk
    Na, Soo-Young
    Yoon, Jin Young
    Jung, Yunho
    Seo, Geom Seog
    Cha, Jae Myung
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 59 (05) : 402 - 410
  • [3] Novel sulfate tablet PBK-1701TC versus oral sulfate solution for colon cleansing: A randomized phase 3 trial
    Yang, Hyo-Joon
    Park, Dong Il
    Park, Soo-Kyung
    Lee, Chang Kyun
    Kim, Hyo Jong
    Oh, Shin Ju
    Moon, Jung Rock
    Lee, Beom Jae
    Koh, Jin Sung
    Kim, Hyun Soo
    Park, Seon-Young
    Kim, Dong Hyun
    Chun, Jaeyoung
    Kang, Eun Ae
    Kim, Jung
    Soh, Hosim
    Eun, Chang Soo
    Kim, You Sun
    Jeen, Yoon Tae
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 35 (01) : 29 - 36
  • [4] Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of oral sulfate tablet versus 2 L-polyethylene glycol/ascorbate for bowel preparation in older patients: prospective, multicenter, investigator single-blinded, randomized study
    Ho Suk Kang
    Soo-Young Na
    Jin Young Yoon
    Yunho Jung
    Geom Seog Seo
    Jae Myung Cha
    Journal of Gastroenterology, 2024, 59 : 402 - 410
  • [5] Comparison of the efficacy and safety between oral sulfate tablet and polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation before colonoscopy according to age
    Kim, Jae Hyun
    Park, Yong Eun
    Kim, Tae Oh
    Park, Jongha
    Oh, Gyu Man
    Moon, Won
    Park, Seun Ja
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (27) : E29884
  • [6] The risk of surgical site infection of oral sulfate tablet versus sodium picosulfate for bowel preparation in colorectal cancer surgery: a randomized clinical trial
    Park, Sung Sil
    Park, Sung Chan
    Lee, Dong-Eun
    Lee, Dong Woon
    Yu, Kiho
    Park, Hyoung-Chul
    Hong, Chang Won
    Sohn, Dae Kyung
    Han, Kyung Su
    Kim, Bun
    Kim, Byung Chang
    Oh, Jae Hwan
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT AND RESEARCH, 2022, 103 (02) : 96 - 103
  • [7] Efficacy and safety of oral sodium sulfate tablet compared with 1-L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate: a prospective, randomized, endoscopist-blinded trial
    Park, Jin Hwa
    Hong, Seung Wook
    Hwang, Sung Wook
    Park, Sang Hyoung
    Yang, Dong-Hoon
    Ye, Byong Duk
    Myung, Seung-Jae
    Yang, Suk-Kyun
    Byeon, Jeong-Sik
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 38 (12) : 2090 - 2096
  • [8] Comparison of the Efficacy and Tolerability between Same-day Picosulfate and Split-dose Polyethylene Glycol Bowel Preparation for Afternoon Colonoscopy: A Prospective, Randomized, Investigator-blinded Trial
    Kang, Mi Seon
    Kim, Tae Oh
    Seo, Eun Hee
    Jung, Da Kyung
    Kim, Mo Se
    Heo, Nae Yun
    Park, Jong Ha
    Park, Seung Ha
    Moon, Young Soo
    INTESTINAL RESEARCH, 2014, 12 (01) : 53 - 59
  • [9] Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Polyethylene Glycol With Ascorbic Acid and an Oral Sulfate Solution in a Split Method for Bowel Preparation: A Randomized, Multicenter Phase III Clinical Trial
    Kim, Bun
    Lee, Seong Dae
    Han, Kyung Su
    Kim, Byung Chang
    Youk, Eui-Gon
    Nam, Myung Jin
    Lee, Doo Han
    Sohn, Dae Kyung
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2017, 60 (04) : 426 - 432
  • [10] A prospective, single-blinded, non-inferiority, randomized controlled study comparing the effectiveness and safety of oral lactulose combined with carbohydrate-containing clear liquids versus 3-L polyethylene glycol electrolyte for colonoscopy bowel preparation
    Huang, Chen
    Liu, Hongli
    Luo, Jing
    Xu, Zhe
    Li, Jibin
    Tian, Xu
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2025, 30 (01) : 105