Comparison of a novel mini-oral sulfate tablet and the conventional oral sulfate tablet in bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded, multicenter, non-inferior, phase 3 trial

被引:4
作者
Jeon, Seong Ran [1 ]
Park, Soo-Kyung [2 ]
Yang, Dong-Hoon [3 ]
Cha, Jae Myung [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Soonchunhyang Univ, Inst Digest Res, Digest Dis Ctr, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Kangbuk Samsung Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Sch Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Univ Ulsan, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Kyung Hee Univ, Kyung Hee Univ Hosp Gangdong, Dept Internal Med, Div Gastroenterol,Sch Med, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Kyung Hee Univ, Kyung Hee Univ Hosp Gang Dong, Dept Internal Med, Div Gastroenterol,Sch Med, 892 Dongnam Ro, Seoul 05278, South Korea
关键词
Bowel preparation; Colonoscopy; Efficacy; Oral sulfate tablet; Mini-oral sulfate tablet; PLUS POLYETHYLENE-GLYCOL; ELECTROLYTE-SOLUTION; QUALITY; VALIDATION; MORTALITY; EFFICACY; SCALE;
D O I
10.1007/s00535-023-02023-5
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and aims The use of conventional oral sulfate tablets (OSTs) has gained popularity; nonetheless, they may be not only inconvenient to swallow but also difficult to dissolve. A novel mini-OST has recently been developed to enhance compliance with conventional OST use. This study aimed to compare the efficacy, tolerability, and safety between mini-OST and conventional OST. Methods This was a prospective, randomized, investigatorblinded, multicenter, and non-inferior phase 3 trial conducted between September 2022 and December 2022. The efficacy, safety, and tolerability were compared between mini-OST and conventional OST. Results Exactly 83 patients were evaluated based on a full analysis set (FAS), whereas 82 patients were evaluated as a per-protocol set (PPS). With respect to the efficacy of preparation, successful and high-quality preparation was excellent in the mini-OST and conventional OST groups on both FAS and PPS analyses, without significant differences between the two groups. On the FAS analysis, the satisfaction and tolerability scores were high in both groups, without significant differences. The first bowel movement after taking the investigational product occurred 30 min earlier in the mini-OST group than in the OST group. Mild, moderate, and severe adverse events (AEs) were comparable between the two groups; however, any AEs were more common in the mini-OST group than in the conventional OST group overall. Conclusions Compared with conventional OST, the novel mini-OST preparation showed similar efficacy, tolerability, and safety, including mild eight solicited AEs and moderate-to-severe AEs. Clinical trial registration NCT05670470.
引用
收藏
页码:1114 / 1123
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Predictors and colonoscopy outcomes of inadequate bowel cleansing: a 10-year experience in 28,725 patients [J].
Abu Baker, Fadi ;
Mari, Amir ;
Nafrin, Smadar ;
Suki, Muhammed ;
Ovadia, Baruch ;
Gal, Oren ;
Kopelamn, Yael .
ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 32 (05) :457-462
[2]   A Comparative Study of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Following Use of Common Bowel Preparations Among a Colonoscopy Screening Population: Results from a Post-Marketing Observational Study [J].
Anastassopoulos, Kathryn ;
Farraye, Francis A. ;
Knight, Tyler ;
Colman, Sam ;
Cleveland, Mark vB. ;
Pelham, Russell W. .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2016, 61 (10) :2993-3006
[3]   Rapid Colonoscopy Preparation Using Bolus Lukewarm Saline Combined with Sequential Posture Changes: A Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Arya, Vijaypal ;
Gupta, Kalpana A. ;
Valluri, Ashok ;
Arya, Swarn V. ;
Lesser, Martin L. .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2013, 58 (08) :2156-2166
[4]   Colon cleansing efficacy and safety with 1 L NER1006 versus 2 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate: a randomized phase 3 trial [J].
Bisschops, Raf ;
Manning, Jonathan ;
Clayton, Lucy B. ;
Shing, Richard Ng Kwet ;
Alvarez-Gonzalez, Marco .
ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 51 (01) :60-72
[5]   Results of a prospective randomised multicentre controlled trial comparing a new 2-L ascorbic acid plus polyethylene glycol and electrolyte solution vs. sodium phosphate solution in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy [J].
Bitoun, A. ;
Ponchon, T. ;
Barthet, M. ;
Coffin, B. ;
Dugue, C. ;
Halphen, M. .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2006, 24 (11-12) :1631-1642
[6]   Clinical trial: 2-L polyethylene glycol-based lavage solutions for colonoscopy preparation - a randomized, single-blind study of two formulations [J].
Cohen, L. B. ;
Sanyal, S. M. ;
von Althann, C. ;
Bodian, C. ;
Whitson, M. ;
Bamji, N. ;
Miller, K. M. ;
Mavronicolas, W. ;
Burd, S. ;
Freedman, J. ;
Aisenberg, J. .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2010, 32 (05) :637-644
[7]   Novel 1 L polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation NER1006 for overall and right-sided colon cleansing: a randomized controlled phase 3 trial versus trisulfate [J].
DeMicco, Michael P. ;
Clayton, Lucy B. ;
Pilot, Jeff ;
Epstein, Michael S. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 87 (03) :677-+
[8]   A Safety and Efficacy Comparison of a New Sulfate-Based Tablet Bowel Preparation Versus a PEG and Ascorbate Comparator in Adult Subjects Undergoing Colonoscopy [J].
di Palma, Jack A. ;
Bhandari, Raj ;
Cleveland, Mark V. B. ;
Mishkin, Daniel S. ;
Tesoriero, Jessica ;
Hall, Sue ;
McGowan, John .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 116 (02) :319-328
[9]   A Randomized Clinical Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of a New, Reduced-Volume, Oral Sulfate Colon-Cleansing Preparation for Colonoscopy [J].
Di Palma, Jack A. ;
Rodriguez, Reynaldo ;
McGowan, John ;
Cleveland, Mark vB. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 104 (09) :2275-2284
[10]   Validation of the Harefield Cleansing Scale: a tool for the evaluation of bowel cleansing quality in both research and clinical practice [J].
Halphen, Marc ;
Heresbach, Denis ;
Gruss, Hans-Jurgen ;
Belsey, Jonathan .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2013, 78 (01) :121-131