A systems perspective on water markets: barriers, bright spots, and building blocks for the next generation

被引:16
作者
Garrick, Dustin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Balasubramanya, Soumya [4 ]
Beresford, Melissa [5 ]
Wutich, Amber [6 ,7 ]
Gilson, Gina G. [8 ]
Jorgensen, Isabel [1 ,2 ]
Brozovic, Nicholas [9 ,10 ]
Cox, Michael [11 ]
Dai, Xiaoping [12 ,13 ]
Erfurth, Sophie [8 ]
Rimsaite, Renata [14 ]
Svensson, Jesper [8 ]
Jones, Julia Talbot [15 ]
Unnikrishnan, Hita
Wight, Charles [8 ]
Villamayor-Tomas, Sergio
Mendoza, Karla Vazquez
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Water Inst, Waterloo, ON, Canada
[2] Sch Environm Resources & Sustainabil, Waterloo, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Oxford, Green Templeton Coll, Oxford, England
[4] World Bank, Environm Nat Resources & Blue Econ Global Practic, Washington, DC USA
[5] San Jose State Univ, Coll Social Sci, Dept Anthropol, San Jose, CA USA
[6] Arizona State Univ, Sch Human Evolut & Social Change, Tempe, AZ USA
[7] Ctr Global Hlth, Tempe, AZ USA
[8] Univ Oxford, Sch Geog & Environm, Oxford, England
[9] Univ Nebraska, Daugherty Water Food Global Inst, Lincoln, NE USA
[10] Univ Nebraska Lincoln, Dept Agr Econ, Lincoln, NE USA
[11] Dartmouth Coll, Dept Environm Studies, Hanover, NH USA
[12] North China Univ Water Resources & Elect Power, Agr Water Management, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
[13] Hohai Univ, Coll Agr Sci & Engn, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[14] Univ Nebraska Lincoln, Natl Drought Mitigat Ctr, Lincoln, NE USA
[15] Te Herenga Waka Victoria Univ Wellington, Sch Govt, Wellington, New Zealand
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
systems thinking; water markets; informality; water rights; institutions; observatory; EFFICIENCY; LESSONS; GAINS;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/acb227
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Brookings Future Development Blog
[2]   The adaptive benefits of agricultural water markets in California [J].
Arellano-Gonzalez, Jesus ;
AghaKouchak, Amir ;
Levy, Morgan C. ;
Qin, Yue ;
Burney, Jennifer ;
Davis, Steven J. ;
Moore, Frances C. .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 16 (04)
[3]   Do Environmental Markets Improve on Open Access? Evidence from California Groundwater Rights [J].
Ayres, Andrew B. ;
Meng, Kyle C. ;
Plantinga, Andrew J. .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2021, 129 (10) :2817-2860
[4]   Positive incentives for managing groundwater in the presence of informal water markets: perspectives from India [J].
Balasubramanya, Soumya ;
Buisson, Marie-Charlotte .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 17 (10)
[6]   The Gains from Agricultural Groundwater Trade and the Potential for Market Power: Theory and Application [J].
Bruno, Ellen M. ;
Sexton, Richard J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 102 (03) :884-910
[7]   Electric Pumps, Groundwater, Agriculture and Water Buyers: Evidence from West Bengal [J].
Buisson, Marie-Charlotte ;
Balasubramanya, Soumya ;
Stifel, David .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2021, 57 (11) :1893-1911
[8]   Water markets and trading [J].
Chong, Howard ;
Sunding, David .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, 2006, 31 :239-264
[9]   Lessons learned from synthetic research projects based on the Ostrom Workshop frameworks [J].
Cox, Michael ;
Gurney, Georgina G. ;
Anderies, John M. ;
Coleman, Eric ;
Darling, Emily ;
Epstein, Graham ;
Frey, Ulrich J. ;
Nenadovic, Mateja ;
Schlager, Edella ;
Villamayor-Tomas, Sergio .
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2021, 26 (01)
[10]  
Dubash N.K., 2002, TUBEWELL CAPITALISM