Extenuating operational risks through digital transformation of agri-food supply chains

被引:53
作者
Ali, Imran [1 ]
Govindan, Kannan [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Cent Queensland Univ, Sch Business & Law, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Southern Denmark, Ctr Sustainable Supply Chain Engn, Dept Technol & Innovat, Odense, Denmark
[3] Shanghai Maritime Univ, China Inst FTZ Supply Chain, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Yonsei Univ, Yonsei Frontier Lab, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Industry; 4; 0; technologies; supply chain risk; COVID-19; food industry; empirical; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY CAPABILITY; INDUSTRY; 4.0; TECHNOLOGIES; RESOURCE-BASED-VIEW; BIG DATA ANALYTICS; FIRM PERFORMANCE; LOGISTICS; MANAGEMENT; IMPLEMENTATION; INTERNET; THINGS;
D O I
10.1080/09537287.2021.1988177
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The increasingly unprecedented incidents (e.g. COVID-19) have made the contemporary supply chains more vulnerable to divergent risks and disruptions. Encouragingly, the recent trend of digital transformation, adoption of Industry 4.0 technologies (I4Ts), could significantly improve business processes extenuating potential risks and disruptions. Yet, there is a paucity of quantitative studies on the risk or disruption mitigation and I4Ts, specifically on agri-food industry. Using a sample of 302 firms from the Australian agri-food supply chains, we explore if the firms that adopt I4Ts experience the different impact of operational risks (supply-demand mismatch, financial and transportation) compared to others. The findings unveil that albeit such risks can significantly undermine firm performance, their negative effect is non-significant for the firms that adopt I4Ts compared to those that do not adopt. We thus suggest digital transformation as an effective way to extenuate operational risks and disruptions amid unanticipated events like COVID-19. Numerous contributions to theory and practice, plus United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (1 & 2) have been discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1165 / 1177
页数:13
相关论文
共 70 条
[61]   Supply chain redesign in the aquaculture supply chain: a longitudinal case study [J].
Vlachos, Ilias ;
Malindretos, George .
PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2023, 34 (08) :748-764
[62]   AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF SUPPLY CHAIN PERFORMANCE ALONG SEVERAL DIMENSIONS OF RISK [J].
Wagner, Stephan M. ;
Bode, Christoph .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS LOGISTICS, 2008, 29 (01) :307-+
[63]   Big data analytics and firm performance: Effects of dynamic capabilities [J].
Wamba, Samuel Fosso ;
Gunasekaran, Angappa ;
Akter, Shahriar ;
Ren, Steven Ji-fan ;
Dubey, Rameshwar ;
Childe, Stephen J. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2017, 70 :356-365
[64]   A RESOURCE-BASED VIEW OF THE FIRM [J].
WERNERFELT, B .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1984, 5 (02) :171-180
[65]   Method Variance and Marker Variables: A Review and Comprehensive CFA Marker Technique [J].
Williams, Larry J. ;
Hartman, Nathan ;
Cavazotte, Flavia .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2010, 13 (03) :477-514
[66]   Logistics 4.0: a systematic review towards a new logistics system [J].
Winkelhaus, Sven ;
Grosse, Eric H. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2020, 58 (01) :18-43
[67]  
Wooldridge JM, 2010, ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF CROSS SECTION AND PANEL DATA, 2ND EDITION, P3
[68]   Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends [J].
Xu, Li Da ;
Xu, Eric L. ;
Li, Ling .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2018, 56 (08) :2941-2962
[69]   The evolution of production systems from Industry 2.0 through Industry 4.0 [J].
Yin, Yong ;
Stecke, Kathryn E. ;
Li, Dongni .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2018, 56 (1-2) :848-861
[70]  
Zsidisin G.A., 2003, J PURCHASING SUPPLY, V9,, P217, DOI [10.1016/j.purs, DOI 10.1016/J.PURSUP.2003.07.002]