Brain reward function in people who use cannabis: a systematic review

被引:1
|
作者
Beyer, Emillie [1 ]
Poudel, Govinda [2 ,3 ]
Antonopoulos, Stephanie [4 ]
Thomson, Hannah [1 ]
Lorenzetti, Valentina [1 ]
机构
[1] Australian Catholic Univ, Hlth Brain & Mind Res Ctr, Sch Behav & Hlth Sci, Neurosci Addict & Mental Hlth Program, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Australian Catholic Univ, Mary MacKillop Inst Hlth Res, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Braincast Neurotechnol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Monash Univ, Turner Inst Brain & Mental Hlth, Sch Psychol Sci, Clayton, Vic, Australia
来源
FRONTIERS IN BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE | 2024年 / 17卷
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
cannabis; monetary incentive delay task (MIDT); reward processing; fMRI; neuroimaging; systematic review; functional neuroimaging;
D O I
10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1323609
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Rationale Cannabis is one of the most widely used psychoactive substances globally. Cannabis use can be associated with alterations of reward processing, including affective flattening, apathy, anhedonia, and lower sensitivity to natural rewards in conjunction with higher sensitivity to cannabis-related rewards. Such alterations have been posited to be driven by changes in underlying brain reward pathways, as per prominent neuroscientific theories of addiction. Functional neuroimaging (fMRI) studies have examined brain reward function in cannabis users via the monetary incentive delay (MID) fMRI task; however, this evidence is yet to be systematically synthesised.Objectives We aimed to systematically integrate the evidence on brain reward function in cannabis users examined by the MID fMRI task; and in relation to metrics of cannabis exposure (e.g., dosage, frequency) and other behavioural variables.Method We pre-registered the review in PROSPERO and reported it using PRISMA guidelines. Literature searches were conducted in PsycINFO, PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, and Scopus.Results Nine studies were included, comprising 534 people with mean ages 16-to-28 years, of which 255 were people who use cannabis daily or almost daily, and 279 were controls. The fMRI literature to date led to largely non-significant group differences. A few studies reported group differences in the ventral striatum while participants anticipated rewards and losses; and in the caudate while participants received neutral outcomes. A few studies examined correlations between brain function and withdrawal, dosage, and age of onset; and reported inconsistent findings.Conclusions There is emerging but inconsistent evidence of altered brain reward function in cannabis users examined with the MID fMRI task. Future fMRI studies are required to confirm if the brain reward system is altered in vulnerable cannabis users who experience a Cannabis Use Disorder, as postulated by prominent neuroscientific theories of addiction.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reasons and subjective effects of cannabis use among people with psychotic disorders: a systematic review
    Gomez Perez, Laura
    Mane Santacana, Anna
    Berge Baquero, Daniel
    Perez-Sola, Victor
    ACTAS ESPANOLAS DE PSIQUIATRIA, 2014, 42 (02): : 83 - 90
  • [32] Light Cannabis Use and the Adolescent Brain: An 8-years Longitudinal Assessment of Mental Health, Cognition, and Reward Processing
    Macedo, Ines
    Paiva, Tiago O.
    Pasion, Rita
    Daedelow, Laura
    Heinz, Andreas
    Magalhaes, Ana
    Banaschewski, Tobias
    Bokde, Arun L. W.
    Desrivieres, Sylvane
    Flor, Herta
    Grigis, Antoine
    Garavan, Hugh
    Gowland, Penny
    Bruehl, Ruediger
    Martinot, Jean-Luc
    Martinot, Marie-Laure Paillere
    Artiges, Eric
    Nees, Frauke
    Orfanos, Dimitri Papadopoulos
    Paus, Tomas
    Poustka, Luise
    Hohmann, Sarah
    Holz, Nathalie
    Froehner, Juliane H.
    Smolka, Michael N.
    Vaidya, Nilakshi
    Walter, Henrik
    Whelan, Robert
    Schumann, Gunter
    Barbosa, Fernando
    PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 241 (07) : 1447 - 1461
  • [33] Cannabis and cannabinoid use in autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review
    da Silva Junior, Estacio Amaro
    Brito Medeiros, Wandersonia Moreira
    Torro, Nelson
    Medeiros de Sousa, Joao Marcal
    Cahino Moura de Almeida, Igor Bronzeado
    da Costa, Filipe Barbosa
    Pontes, Katiuscia Moreira
    Guerra Nunes, Eliane Lima
    da Rosa, Marine Diniz
    Gondim Dias de Albuquerque, Katy Lisias
    TRENDS IN PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2022, 44
  • [34] Effects of motivational groups for people with psychosis who use cannabis
    Favrod, Jerome
    Gibellini Manetti, Silvia
    Rexhaj, Shyhrete
    Crespi Balemi, Sara
    Conus, Philippe
    Bonsack, Charles
    EVOLUTION PSYCHIATRIQUE, 2013, 78 (01): : 97 - 106
  • [35] A Systematic Review: Adolescent Cannabis Use and Suicide
    Schmidt, Kristen
    Tseng, Irene
    Phan, Amanda
    Fong, Timothy
    Tsuang, John
    ADDICTIVE DISORDERS & THEIR TREATMENT, 2020, 19 (03) : 146 - 151
  • [36] Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Levels in Cannabis Use Disorders - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Mohanraj, Palani S.
    Das, Arani
    Sen, Aniruddha
    Prithviraj, Manoj
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (09)
  • [37] Cannabis use and mood disorders: a systematic review
    Sorkhou, Maryam
    Dent, Eliza L.
    George, Tony P.
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 12
  • [38] Prevalence of Cannabis Withdrawal Symptoms Among People With Regular or Dependent Use of Cannabinoids: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Bahji, Anees
    Stephenson, Callum
    Tyo, Richard
    Hawken, Emily
    Seitz, Dallas
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 89 (09) : S222 - S222
  • [39] The acute and non-acute effects of cannabis on reward processing: A systematic review
    Skumlien, Martine
    Langley, Christelle
    Lawn, Will
    Voon, Valerie
    Curran, H. Valerie
    Roiser, Jonathan P.
    Sahakian, Barbara J.
    NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2021, 130 : 512 - 528
  • [40] The effect of cannabis use on memory function: an update
    Schoeler, Tabea
    Bhattacharyya, Sagnik
    SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND REHABILITATION, 2013, 4 : 11 - 27