Endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation with sphincterotomy for difficult common bile duct stones ≤12 mm: a prospective study

被引:1
|
作者
Velegraki, Magdalini [1 ]
Arna, Despoina [1 ]
Nikolaou, Pinelopi [1 ]
Psistakis, Andreas [1 ]
Fragaki, Maria [1 ]
Chlouverakis, Gregorios [2 ]
Vardas, Emmanouil [1 ]
Paspatis, Gregorios [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Venizele Gen Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Iraklion, Crete, Greece
[2] Univ Crete, Sch Med, Dept Social Med, Biostat Lab, Iraklion, Crete, Greece
[3] Venizele Gen Hosp, Gastroenterol Dept, Iraklion 71409, Crete, Greece
来源
ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGY | 2024年 / 37卷 / 01期
关键词
Balloon dilation; bile duct stones; FOLLOW-UP; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; REMOVAL; RECURRENCE; CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS;
D O I
10.20524/aog.2023.0855
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Stone recurrence is a significant complication following endoscopic bile duct clearance. Endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation (EPLBD) with biliary sphincterotomy (EBS) has shown satisfactory results in preventing recurrence of "large" common bile duct stones (CBDS). However, data on outcomes after EPLBD+EBS for CBDS <= 12 mm remain scarce. The present study prospectively evaluated the mid- and long-term efficacy of EPLBD+EBS for CBDS recurrence among this group of patients. Methods Consecutive patients with CBDS ranging from 8-12 mm, treated with EPLBD+EBS from June 2018 through June 2020, were prospectively followed-up for at least 36 months. CBDS recurrence was defined as recurrent stones confirmed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) during the follow-up period. Results Overall, 72 patients (mean age: 67 years, 52.8% male) were included, of whom 22 (30.5%) had multiple (>= 3) CBDS, 23 (31.9%) had a history of cholecystectomy, 13 (18.1%) had a periampullary diverticulum and 22 (30.5%) had a previous EBS. The mean CBD diameter was 11.6 +/- 1 mm, while a tapered duct was noted in 7 (9.7%). Post-procedural bleeding and cholangitis occurred in 1 and 2 cases respectively. No cases of perforation and post-ERCP pancreatitis were observed. During a mean follow up of 46.4 +/- 6.2 months (range 37-60), no mid-term recurrence was observed, whereas CBDS recurred in 2/72 (2.7%) in the long term. Conclusions EPLBD+EBS in patients with CBDS <= 12 mm was associated with a very low rate of mid- and long-term CBDS recurrence. Our results need to be further investigated with randomized controlled trials.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 94
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilatation With or Without Endoscopic Sphincterotomy in the Treatment of Common Bile Duct Stones
    Wang, Jia
    Cao, Lichao
    Xue, Kuijin
    Qi, Peng
    Mao, Qingdong
    Cui, Mingjuan
    Ju, Hui
    He, Baoguo
    Cao, Bin
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2025, 70 (02) : 478 - 493
  • [32] A cumulative meta-analysis of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of common bile duct stones
    Tringali, Alberto
    Rota, Matteo
    Rossi, Marta
    Hassan, Cesare
    Adler, Douglas G.
    Mutignani, Massimiliano
    ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 51 (06) : 548 - 559
  • [33] Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for the treatment of recurrent bile duct stones in patients with prior sphincterotomy
    Kyeong Ok Kim
    Tae Nyeun Kim
    Si Hyung Lee
    Journal of Gastroenterology, 2010, 45 : 1283 - 1288
  • [34] Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for bile duct stones in elderly patients
    Sakai, Yuji
    Tsuyuguchi, Toshio
    Sugiyama, Harutoshi
    Sasaki, Reina
    Sakamoto, Dai
    Nakamura, Masato
    Watanabe, Yuuto
    Nishikawa, Takao
    Yasui, Shin
    Mikata, Rintaro
    Yokosuka, Osamu
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2015, 3 (04) : 353 - 359
  • [35] Large Size Balloon Dilation of the Ampulla After Biliary Sphincterotomy Can Facilitate Endoscopic Extraction of Difficult Bile Duct Stones
    Draganov, Peter V.
    Evans, William
    Fazel, Ali
    Forsmark, Chris E.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 43 (08) : 782 - 786
  • [36] Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for removal of bile duct stones
    Sakai, Yuji
    Tsuyuguchi, Toshio
    Kawaguchi, Yoshiaki
    Hirata, Nobuto
    Nakaji, So
    Kitamura, Katsuya
    Mikami, Shigeru
    Fujimoto, Tatsuya
    Ijima, Masashi
    Kurihara, Eishin
    Oana, Shuhei
    Nishino, Takayoshi
    Tamura, Ryo
    Sakamoto, Dai
    Nakamura, Masato
    Nishikawa, Takao
    Sugiyama, Harutoshi
    Yoshida, Hitoshi
    Mine, Tetsuya
    Yokosuka, Osamu
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (45) : 17148 - 17154
  • [37] Can a small endoscopic sphincterotomy plus a large-balloon dilation reduce the use of mechanical lithotripsy in patients with large bile duct stones?
    Kim, Tae Hyeon
    Oh, Hyo Jeong
    Lee, Jun Young
    Sohn, Young Woo
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 25 (10): : 3330 - 3337
  • [38] Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for the removal of bile duct stones
    Jin Hong Kim
    Min Jae Yang
    Jae Chul Hwang
    Byung Moo Yoo
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2013, (46) : 8580 - 8594
  • [39] Complete endoscopic sphincterotomy with vs. without large-balloon dilation for the removal of large bile duct stones: randomized multicenter study
    Karsenti, David
    Coron, Emmanuel
    Vanbiervliet, Geoffroy
    Privat, Jocelyn
    Kull, Eric
    Bichard, Philippe
    Perrot, Bastien
    Quentin, Vincent
    Duriez, Arnaud
    Cholet, Franck
    Subtil, Clement
    Duchmann, Jean Christophe
    Lefort, Christine
    Hudziak, Herve
    Koch, Stephane
    Granval, Philippe
    Lecleire, Stephane
    Charachon, Antoine
    Barange, Karl
    Cesbron, Elodie Metivier
    De Widerspach, Axel
    Le Baleur, Yann
    Barthet, Marc
    Poincloux, Laurent
    ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 49 (10) : 968 - 976
  • [40] Long-term outcomes after endoscopic sphincterotomy versus endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for bile duct stones
    Yasuda, Ichiro
    Fujita, Naotaka
    Maguchi, Hiroyuki
    Hasebe, Osamu
    Igarashi, Yoshinori
    Murakami, Akihiko
    Mukai, Hidekazu
    Fujii, Tsuneshi
    Yamao, Kenji
    Maeshiro, Kensei
    Tada, Tomoko
    Tsujino, Takeshi
    Komatsu, Yutaka
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 72 (06) : 1185 - 1191