Bayesian network model of aviation safety: Impact of new communication technologies on mid-air collisions

被引:7
作者
Bauranov, Aleksandar [1 ]
Rakas, Jasenka [2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Grad Sch Design, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, FAA Consortium Aviat Res, NEXTOR 3, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
Bayesian Belief Network; Aircraft collision analysis; Data Communication; Risk assessment; INCIDENT ANALYSIS; ACCIDENT MODEL; SYSTEMS; RISK; STAMP;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2023.109905
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This article presents a method of estimating the risk of a mid-air collision. The proposed method is an enhancement of the traditional aviation safety model - Integrated Safety Assessment Model (ISAM) - developed by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and EUROCONTROL. ISAM is a mix of event-based models and fault trees that identifies causes of 35 different types of aviation accidents. While useful for conceptual understanding of accidents, the model does not handle human-technical or inter-system interactions. These drawbacks are especially evident when assessing safety impact of new communication, navigation and surveillance technologies since they rely on pilots and controllers. We propose a method of analyzing the impact of new technologies in aviation by presenting a case study of the Data Communication system - a new technology developed by the FAA used for communication between pilots and controllers. The method builds upon ISAM and leverages a Bayesian Network to estimate safety risk. The results indicate that the implementation of Data Comm can reduce the risk of collision by 25 %. In addition, if a collision has occurred, it is 10 million times more probable that the likely culprit is an error in human communication rather than a failure of communication equipment.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 96 条
[11]   Precursors and startling lessons: Statistical analysis of 1250 events with safety significance from the civil nuclear sector [J].
Ayoub, Ali ;
Stankovski, Andrej ;
Kroger, Wolfgang ;
Sornette, Didier .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2021, 214
[12]  
Bachelder E., 2001, P AIAAIEEE DIGITAL A, p5A51, DOI [10.1109/DASC.2001.963388, DOI 10.1109/DASC.2001.963388]
[13]  
BENNER L, 1975, J SAFETY RES, V7, P67
[14]  
Benner L., 1984, INT SEMINAR OCCUPATI
[15]   On the rationale of resilience in the domain of safety: A literature review [J].
Bergstrom, Johan ;
van Winsen, Roel ;
Henriqson, Eder .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2015, 141 :131-141
[16]   Improving the analysis of dependable systems by mapping fault trees into Bayesian networks [J].
Bobbio, A ;
Portinale, L ;
Minichino, M ;
Ciancamerla, E .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2001, 71 (03) :249-260
[17]  
Borener S., 2012, PROCCEDINGS ANN INT
[18]   Analysis of the Effects of Communication and Surveillance Facility Service Outages on Traffic Separations [J].
Borener, Sherry S. ;
Guzhva, Vitaly S. .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2014, 34 (09) :1753-1762
[19]  
Bosse T, 2013, P 4 INT AIR TRANSPOR
[20]   A discrete-time Bayesian network reliability modeling and analysis framework [J].
Boudali, H ;
Dugan, JB .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2005, 87 (03) :337-349