Spatial Trade-Offs and Synergies between Ecosystem Services in Guangdong Province, China

被引:4
作者
Xu, Qian [1 ]
Yang, Ying [2 ]
Yang, Ren [3 ]
Zha, Li-Si [1 ]
Lin, Zi-Qing [1 ]
Shang, Shu-Hao [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Publ Adm, Guangzhou 510320, Peoples R China
[2] Guangdong Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Culture Tourism & Geog, Guangzhou 510320, Peoples R China
[3] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Geog & Planning, Guangzhou 510275, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ecosystem services; trade-off; synergy; spatial relation; VEGETATION;
D O I
10.3390/land13010032
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The trade-offs between ecosystem services directly affect the quality of the ecological environment and the survival and development of human society, which is of great concern to academia, governments, and non-governmental organizations. Guangdong Province is a strong economic performer in China; hence, we selected it to explore the trade-off and synergy differences between different ecosystem services, and to investigate the mechanisms of their influence in economically developed regions with a large population density. Our results showed three main points: (1) The ecosystem services in Guangdong Province showed clear spatial heterogeneity. In addition, northern Guangdong has high levels of water retention, with a value of 5804.73 x 10(4) m(3)/km(2) and high values for carbon sequestration and soil retention. Western Guangdong is a functional area for food production, and the Pearl River Delta is an economically developed region with low levels of ecosystem services. (2) Overall, in Guangdong Province, three pairs of ecosystem services, namely water retention-soil retention, carbon sequestration-water retention, and carbon sequestration-soil retention, showed a strong positive correlation and good synergistic relationships. The other three pairs of relationships show strong trade-off effects. (3) The relationships between similar ecosystem services show completely different characteristics in different regions. Carbon sequestration and water retention, carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation, water retention and biodiversity conservation, and soil retention and biodiversity conservation were mainly manifested in high-high synergies, particularly in northern Guangdong; carbon sequestration and soil retention and water retention and soil retention, primarily manifested synergies; carbon sequestration and food production, water retention and food production, and soil retention and food production mainly manifested as trade-off relationships.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] A network perspective for sustainable agroecosystems
    Allen, Warwick J.
    Bufford, Jennifer L.
    Barnes, Andrew D.
    Barratt, Barbara I. P.
    Deslippe, Julie R.
    Dickie, Ian A.
    Goldson, Stephen L.
    Howlett, Brad G.
    Hulme, Philip E.
    Lavorel, Sandra
    O'Brien, Sophie A.
    Waller, Lauren P.
    Tylianakis, Jason M.
    [J]. TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2022, 27 (08) : 769 - 780
  • [2] Fine-scale monitoring and mapping of biodiversity and ecosystem services reveals multiple synergies and few tradeoffs in urban green space management
    Belaire, J. Amy
    Higgins, Caitlin
    Zoll, Deidre
    Lieberknecht, Katherine
    Bixler, R. Patrick
    Neff, John L.
    Keitt, Timothy H.
    Jha, Shalene
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 849
  • [3] Tradeoffs between economic and ecosystem services in Argentina during 50 years of land-use change
    Carreno, L.
    Frank, F. C.
    Viglizzo, E. F.
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 154 : 68 - 77
  • [4] The role of impact assessment in the development of urban green infrastructure: a review of EIA and SEA practices in Thailand
    Chanchitpricha, Chaunjit
    Fischer, Thomas B.
    [J]. IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PROJECT APPRAISAL, 2022, 40 (03) : 191 - 201
  • [5] Towards systematic analyses of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies: Main concepts, methods and the road ahead
    Cord, Anna F.
    Bartkowski, Bartosz
    Beckmann, Michael
    Dittrich, Andreas
    Hermans-Neumann, Kathleen
    Kaim, Andrea
    Lienhoop, Nele
    Locher-Krause, Karla
    Priess, Joerg
    Schroeter-Schlaack, Christoph
    Schwarz, Nina
    Seppelt, Ralf
    Strauch, Michael
    Vaclavik, Tomas
    Volk, Martin
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2017, 28 : 264 - 272
  • [6] The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
    Costanza, R
    dArge, R
    deGroot, R
    Farber, S
    Grasso, M
    Hannon, B
    Limburg, K
    Naeem, S
    ONeill, RV
    Paruelo, J
    Raskin, RG
    Sutton, P
    vandenBelt, M
    [J]. NATURE, 1997, 387 (6630) : 253 - 260
  • [7] Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go?
    Costanza, Robert
    de Groot, Rudolf
    Braat, Leon
    Kubiszewski, Ida
    Fioramonti, Lorenzo
    Sutton, Paul
    Farber, Steve
    Grasso, Monica
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2017, 28 : 1 - 16
  • [8] Synergies and trade-offs in ecosystem services from urban and peri-urban forests and their implication to sustainable city design and planning
    Cueva, Jessica
    Yakouchenkova, Iulia Almeida
    Froehich, Katrin
    Dermann, Anna Floria
    Dermann, Florian
    Koehler, Mario
    Grossmann, Josef
    Meier, Winfried
    Bauhus, Juergen
    Schroder, Dietrich
    Sardemann, Gerhard
    Thomas, Carolin
    Carnicero, Arturo Romero
    Saha, Somidh
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2022, 82
  • [9] Daily G.C., 1997, Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems, P454, DOI [10.2307/3244191, DOI 10.2307/3244191, DOI 10.12987/9780300188479-039]
  • [10] The Road to Growth: Measuring the Tradeoffs between Economic Growth and Ecological Destruction
    Damania, Richard
    Russ, Jason
    Wheeler, David
    Barra, Alvaro Federico
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 101 : 351 - 376