US and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Women with Focal Breast Complaints: Results of the Breast US Trial (BUST)

被引:6
|
作者
Appelman, Linda [1 ]
Siebers, Carmen C. N. [1 ]
Appelman, Peter T. M. [4 ]
Go, H. L. Shirley [5 ]
Broeders, Mireille J. M. [2 ,6 ]
van Oirsouw, Marja C. J. [7 ]
Bult, Peter [3 ]
Mann, Ritse M. [1 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Med Ctr, Geert Grootepl 10, NL-6525 GA Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Radboud Inst Hlth Sci, Med Ctr, Geert Grootepl 10, NL-6525 GA Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Pathol, Med Ctr, Geert Grootepl 10, NL-6525 GA Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Radiol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Dept Radiol, Alkmaar, Netherlands
[6] Dutch Expert Ctr Screening, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[7] Dutch Breast Canc Soc Borstkankervereniging, Utrecht, Netherlands
[8] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Radiol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
MAMMOGRAPHY; ULTRASOUND; ACCURACY; DIAGNOSIS; CANCER; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; PERFORMANCE; SONOGRAPHY; SYMPTOMS; BENIGN;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.220361
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) followed by targeted US is commonly performed to evaluate women with localized breast complaints. However, the added value of DBT in addition to targeted US is unknown. Omitting DBT may be cost-effective and improve patient comfort but may miss potential breast cancer.Purpose: To assess whether an imaging protocol consisting of targeted US alone may be feasible for the diagnostic work-up of women with localized symptoms and to assess the supplemental value of DBT in this reversed setting.Materials and Methods: This prospective study enrolled consecutive women aged 30 years or older with focal breast complaints in three hospitals in the Netherlands between September 2017 and June 2019. In all participants, first, targeted US was evaluated, and if needed, biopsy was performed, followed by DBT. The primary outcome was the frequency of breast cancer detected with DBT when US was negative. Secondary outcomes were frequency of cancer detected with DBT elsewhere in the breast and combined overall sensitivity of US plus DBT. The reference standard was 1 year follow-up or histopathologic examination.Results: There were 1961 women (mean age & PLUSMN; SD, 47 years & PLUSMN; 12) enrolled. Based on initial US alone, 1587 participants (81%) had normal or benign findings and 1759 (90%) had a definitive accurate diagnosis. In total, 204 breast cancers were detected during initial work-up. The frequency of malignancy was 10% (192 of 1961 participants) with US (US sensitivity, 98.5% [95% CI: 96, 100]; US specificity, 90.8% [95% CI: 89, 92]). DBT depicted three unobserved malignant lesions at the complaint site and 0.41% (eight of 1961 participants) of incidental malignant findings in participants without symptomatic cancer.Conclusion: Compared with combined US and DBT, US was accurate as a stand-alone breast imaging modality in the assessment of focal breast complaints. The rate of cancer detection of cancers elsewhere in the breast with DBT is comparable to cancer detection rate of screening mammography.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Breast density analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis
    Heine, John
    Fowler, Erin E. E.
    Weinfurtner, R. Jared
    Hume, Emma
    Tworoger, Shelley S.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [42] Screening for Dense Breasts: Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Destounis, Stamatia V.
    Morgan, Renee
    Arieno, Andrea
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2015, 204 (02) : 261 - 264
  • [43] Measurement of breast density with digital breast tomosynthesis
    Ren, Baorui
    Smith, Andrew
    Jing, Zhenxue
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2012: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2012, 8313
  • [44] Digital breast tomosynthesis: sensitivity for cancer in younger symptomatic women
    Whelehan, Patsy
    Ali, Kulsam
    Vinnicombe, Sarah
    Ball, Graham
    Cox, Julie
    Farry, Paul
    Jenkin, Maggie
    Lowry, Keith
    McIntosh, Stuart A.
    Nutt, Rachel
    Oeppen, Rachel
    Reilly, Michael
    Stahnke, Michaela
    Steel, Jim
    Sim, Yee Ting
    Warwick, Violet
    Wilkinson, Louise
    Zafeiris, Dimitrios
    Evans, Andrew J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 94 (1119)
  • [45] Dense Breast Ultrasound Screening After Digital Mammography Versus After Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Dibble, Elizabeth H.
    Singer, Tisha M.
    Jimoh, Nneka
    Baird, Grayson L.
    Lourenco, Ana P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2019, 213 (06) : 1397 - 1402
  • [46] Overview of the evidence on digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer detection
    Houssami, Nehmat
    Skaane, Per
    BREAST, 2013, 22 (02) : 101 - 108
  • [47] Role of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Screening and Diagnostic Breast Imaging
    Destounis, Stamatia
    SEMINARS IN ULTRASOUND CT AND MRI, 2018, 39 (01) : 35 - 44
  • [48] How to read a digital breast tomosynthesis
    Tourasse, Christophe
    IMAGERIE DE LA FEMME, 2018, 28 (03) : 178 - 180
  • [49] Geographic Access to Breast Imaging for US Women
    Onega, Tracy
    Hubbard, Rebecca
    Hill, Deirdre
    Lee, Christoph I.
    Haas, Jennifer S.
    Carlos, Heather A.
    Alford-Teaster, Jennifer
    Bogart, Andy
    DeMartini, Wendy B.
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Virnig, Beth A.
    Buist, Diana S. M.
    Henderson, Louise
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 11 (09) : 874 - 882
  • [50] Impact of breast density on diagnostic accuracy in digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: results from a European screening trial
    Jakob Olinder
    Kristin Johnson
    Anna Åkesson
    Daniel Förnvik
    Sophia Zackrisson
    Breast Cancer Research, 25