US and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Women with Focal Breast Complaints: Results of the Breast US Trial (BUST)

被引:6
|
作者
Appelman, Linda [1 ]
Siebers, Carmen C. N. [1 ]
Appelman, Peter T. M. [4 ]
Go, H. L. Shirley [5 ]
Broeders, Mireille J. M. [2 ,6 ]
van Oirsouw, Marja C. J. [7 ]
Bult, Peter [3 ]
Mann, Ritse M. [1 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Med Ctr, Geert Grootepl 10, NL-6525 GA Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Radboud Inst Hlth Sci, Med Ctr, Geert Grootepl 10, NL-6525 GA Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Pathol, Med Ctr, Geert Grootepl 10, NL-6525 GA Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Radiol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Dept Radiol, Alkmaar, Netherlands
[6] Dutch Expert Ctr Screening, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[7] Dutch Breast Canc Soc Borstkankervereniging, Utrecht, Netherlands
[8] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Radiol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
MAMMOGRAPHY; ULTRASOUND; ACCURACY; DIAGNOSIS; CANCER; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; PERFORMANCE; SONOGRAPHY; SYMPTOMS; BENIGN;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.220361
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) followed by targeted US is commonly performed to evaluate women with localized breast complaints. However, the added value of DBT in addition to targeted US is unknown. Omitting DBT may be cost-effective and improve patient comfort but may miss potential breast cancer.Purpose: To assess whether an imaging protocol consisting of targeted US alone may be feasible for the diagnostic work-up of women with localized symptoms and to assess the supplemental value of DBT in this reversed setting.Materials and Methods: This prospective study enrolled consecutive women aged 30 years or older with focal breast complaints in three hospitals in the Netherlands between September 2017 and June 2019. In all participants, first, targeted US was evaluated, and if needed, biopsy was performed, followed by DBT. The primary outcome was the frequency of breast cancer detected with DBT when US was negative. Secondary outcomes were frequency of cancer detected with DBT elsewhere in the breast and combined overall sensitivity of US plus DBT. The reference standard was 1 year follow-up or histopathologic examination.Results: There were 1961 women (mean age & PLUSMN; SD, 47 years & PLUSMN; 12) enrolled. Based on initial US alone, 1587 participants (81%) had normal or benign findings and 1759 (90%) had a definitive accurate diagnosis. In total, 204 breast cancers were detected during initial work-up. The frequency of malignancy was 10% (192 of 1961 participants) with US (US sensitivity, 98.5% [95% CI: 96, 100]; US specificity, 90.8% [95% CI: 89, 92]). DBT depicted three unobserved malignant lesions at the complaint site and 0.41% (eight of 1961 participants) of incidental malignant findings in participants without symptomatic cancer.Conclusion: Compared with combined US and DBT, US was accurate as a stand-alone breast imaging modality in the assessment of focal breast complaints. The rate of cancer detection of cancers elsewhere in the breast with DBT is comparable to cancer detection rate of screening mammography.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Characterization of Breast Lesions: Comparison of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Ultrasonography
    Kim, Sun Ah
    Chang, Jung Min
    Cho, Nariya
    Yi, Ann
    Moon, Woo Kyung
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 16 (02) : 229 - 238
  • [22] The value of mammography in women with focal breast complaints in addition to initial targeted ultrasound
    Appelman, L.
    Appelman, P. T. M.
    Siebers, C. C. N.
    Bult, P.
    Go, H. L. S.
    Schlooz, M.
    Mann, R. M.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2021, 185 (02) : 381 - 389
  • [23] COMPARISON BETWEEN DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY AND DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF BREAST CANCER
    Jari, Irina
    Naum, A. G.
    Gheorghe, Liliana
    Negru, D.
    Ursaru, Manuela
    MEDICAL-SURGICAL JOURNAL-REVISTA MEDICO-CHIRURGICALA, 2019, 123 (01): : 102 - 108
  • [24] Value analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening in a commercially-insured US population
    Bonafede, Machaon M.
    Kalra, Vivek B.
    Miller, Jeffrey D.
    Fajardo, Laurie L.
    CLINICOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2015, 7 : 53 - 63
  • [25] The Effect of Targeted Ultrasound as Primary Imaging Modality on Quality of Life in Women with Focal Breast Complaints: A Comparative Cohort Study
    Siebers, Carmen C. N.
    Appelman, Linda
    van Oirsouw, Marja C. J.
    Appelman, Peter T. M.
    Go, Shirley
    Mann, Ritse M.
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2023, 32 (01) : 71 - 77
  • [26] Clinical Implementation of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Conant, Emily F.
    RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2014, 52 (03) : 499 - +
  • [27] Calcifications in the Breast and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Kopans, Daniel
    Gavenonis, Sara
    Halpern, Elkan
    Moore, Richard
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2011, 17 (06) : 638 - 644
  • [28] Breast Density and Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A TOSYMA Trial Subanalysis
    Weigel, Stefanie
    Heindel, Walter
    Hense, Hans-Werner
    Decker, Thomas
    Gerss, Joachim
    Kerschke, Laura
    TOSYMA Screening Trial Study Grp
    RADIOLOGY, 2023, 306 (02)
  • [29] Tumor Characteristics and Molecular Subtypes in Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: The Malmo Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial
    Johnson, Kristin
    Zackrisson, Sophia
    Rosso, Aldana
    Sartor, Hanna
    Saal, Lao H.
    Andersson, Ingvar
    Lang, Kristina
    RADIOLOGY, 2019, 293 (02) : 273 - 281
  • [30] Efficacy of digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer diagnosis
    Alakhras, M.
    Mello-Thoms, C.
    Rickard, M.
    Bourne, R.
    Brennan, P. C.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2014: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2014, 9037