US and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Women with Focal Breast Complaints: Results of the Breast US Trial (BUST)

被引:6
|
作者
Appelman, Linda [1 ]
Siebers, Carmen C. N. [1 ]
Appelman, Peter T. M. [4 ]
Go, H. L. Shirley [5 ]
Broeders, Mireille J. M. [2 ,6 ]
van Oirsouw, Marja C. J. [7 ]
Bult, Peter [3 ]
Mann, Ritse M. [1 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Med Ctr, Geert Grootepl 10, NL-6525 GA Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Radboud Inst Hlth Sci, Med Ctr, Geert Grootepl 10, NL-6525 GA Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Pathol, Med Ctr, Geert Grootepl 10, NL-6525 GA Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Radiol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Dept Radiol, Alkmaar, Netherlands
[6] Dutch Expert Ctr Screening, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[7] Dutch Breast Canc Soc Borstkankervereniging, Utrecht, Netherlands
[8] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Radiol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
MAMMOGRAPHY; ULTRASOUND; ACCURACY; DIAGNOSIS; CANCER; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; PERFORMANCE; SONOGRAPHY; SYMPTOMS; BENIGN;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.220361
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) followed by targeted US is commonly performed to evaluate women with localized breast complaints. However, the added value of DBT in addition to targeted US is unknown. Omitting DBT may be cost-effective and improve patient comfort but may miss potential breast cancer.Purpose: To assess whether an imaging protocol consisting of targeted US alone may be feasible for the diagnostic work-up of women with localized symptoms and to assess the supplemental value of DBT in this reversed setting.Materials and Methods: This prospective study enrolled consecutive women aged 30 years or older with focal breast complaints in three hospitals in the Netherlands between September 2017 and June 2019. In all participants, first, targeted US was evaluated, and if needed, biopsy was performed, followed by DBT. The primary outcome was the frequency of breast cancer detected with DBT when US was negative. Secondary outcomes were frequency of cancer detected with DBT elsewhere in the breast and combined overall sensitivity of US plus DBT. The reference standard was 1 year follow-up or histopathologic examination.Results: There were 1961 women (mean age & PLUSMN; SD, 47 years & PLUSMN; 12) enrolled. Based on initial US alone, 1587 participants (81%) had normal or benign findings and 1759 (90%) had a definitive accurate diagnosis. In total, 204 breast cancers were detected during initial work-up. The frequency of malignancy was 10% (192 of 1961 participants) with US (US sensitivity, 98.5% [95% CI: 96, 100]; US specificity, 90.8% [95% CI: 89, 92]). DBT depicted three unobserved malignant lesions at the complaint site and 0.41% (eight of 1961 participants) of incidental malignant findings in participants without symptomatic cancer.Conclusion: Compared with combined US and DBT, US was accurate as a stand-alone breast imaging modality in the assessment of focal breast complaints. The rate of cancer detection of cancers elsewhere in the breast with DBT is comparable to cancer detection rate of screening mammography.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Women's Experiences with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Targeted Breast Ultrasound for Focal Breast Complaints: A Survey Study
    Siebers, Carmen C. N.
    Appelman, Linda
    Appelman, Peter T. M.
    Go, Shirley
    van Oirsouw, Marja C. J.
    Broeders, Mireille J. M.
    Mann, Ritse M.
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2024, 33 (04) : 499 - 501
  • [2] Addition of Screening Breast US to Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Average Risk
    Yi, Ann
    Jang, Myoung-jin
    Yim, Dahae
    Kwon, Bo Ra
    Shin, Sung Ui
    Chang, Jung Min
    RADIOLOGY, 2021, 298 (03) : 568 - 575
  • [3] Role of digital breast tomosynthesis in the evaluation of focal breast pain
    Taylor-Cho, Michael W.
    Peacock, Stephanie
    Wolf, Steven
    Thomas, Samantha
    Grimm, Lars J.
    Johnson, Karen S.
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2022, 82 : 73 - 76
  • [4] 3D digital breast tomosynthesis versus US in evaluating breast asymmetries
    Mokhtar, Omnia
    Abd Elsalam, Sahar
    Gamal, Gehan
    Naguib, Eman
    Gomaa, Manal
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2020, 51 (01)
  • [5] 3D digital breast tomosynthesis versus US in evaluating breast asymmetries
    Omnia Mokhtar
    Sahar Abd elsalam
    Gehan Gamal
    Eman Naguib
    Manal Gomaa
    Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 51
  • [6] Initial results of the FUSION-X-US prototype combining 3D automated breast ultrasound and digital breast tomosynthesis
    Schaefgen, Benedikt
    Heil, Joerg
    Barr, Richard G.
    Radicke, Marcus
    Harcos, Aba
    Gomez, Christina
    Stieber, Anne
    Hennigs, Andre
    von Au, Alexandra
    Spratte, Julia
    Rauch, Geraldine
    Rom, Joachim
    Schuetz, Florian
    Sohn, Christof
    Golatta, Michael
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (06) : 2499 - 2506
  • [7] Initial results of the FUSION-X-US prototype combining 3D automated breast ultrasound and digital breast tomosynthesis
    Benedikt Schaefgen
    Joerg Heil
    Richard G. Barr
    Marcus Radicke
    Aba Harcos
    Christina Gomez
    Anne Stieber
    André Hennigs
    Alexandra von Au
    Julia Spratte
    Geraldine Rauch
    Joachim Rom
    Florian Schütz
    Christof Sohn
    Michael Golatta
    European Radiology, 2018, 28 : 2499 - 2506
  • [8] Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: an Overview
    Dhamija, Ekta
    Gulati, Malvika
    Deo, S. V. S.
    Gogia, Ajay
    Hari, Smriti
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 12 (02) : 315 - 329
  • [9] Advances in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Hooley, Regina J.
    Durand, Melissa A.
    Philpotts, Liane E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 208 (02) : 256 - 266
  • [10] Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    不详
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 121 (06) : 1415 - 1417