Robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery in an older population: A comparison study

被引:1
|
作者
Moore, Madison S. [4 ]
Vo, Elise H. [2 ]
Bhattarai, Bikash [2 ,3 ]
Farley, John H. [1 ,2 ]
Monk, Bradley J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,6 ]
Willmott, Lyndsay J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
Chase, Dana M. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Phoenix, AZ USA
[2] Creighton Univ, Dign Hlth St Josephs Hosp & Med Ctr, Sch Med, Phoenix, AZ USA
[3] Maricopa Integrated Hlth Syst, Phoenix, AZ USA
[4] US Oncol Network, Arizona Oncol, Phoenix, AZ USA
[5] Virginia Piper Canc Care Network, Arizona Ctr Canc Care, Phoenix, AZ USA
[6] HonorHlth Res Inst, Phoenix, AZ USA
[7] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
Robotic surgery; Gynecology oncology; Older patient; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; OUTCOMES; AGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101533
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Robotic-assisted surgery in select patients has been shown to result in less peri-operative morbidity. Few studies have explored the association of robotic-assisted gynecology oncology surgery complication rates and increasing age. Our objective was to evaluate the peri- and postoperative complication rates in patients age 65 years or above in minimally-invasive robotic gynecologic surgery. Material and Methods: We performed a retrospective review of data from 765 consecutive minimally-invasive robotic-assisted surgeries performed by high-volume gynecologic oncologists. The patients were divided into "younger" patients aged <65 years and "older" patients aged & GE;65 years. The primary outcomes were intraoperative and postoperative complications. Results: Of the 765 patients analyzed, 185 (24%) were & GE; 65. The intraoperative complication rate in patients <65 was 1.9% (11/580) versus 1.62% (3/185) in females & GE;65 (p = 0.808). The postoperative complication rate in patients <65 was 15.5% (90/580) versus 22.7% (42/185) in females & GE;65 (p = 0.328). We observed more postoperative complications with patients who had intraoperative complications compared to patients who developed post-operative complications without intraoperative complcations in our sample, but it was not statisticaly significant (OR = 2.78, p = 0.097). The average estimated blood loss was 137.5 ml (0-1000) for patients younger than 65 years and 134.81 ml (0-2200) in patients 65 years or older (p = 0.097). Discussion: Robotic gynecologic oncology surgery is common. When performed by expert surgeons, complications are not associated with increasing age.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robotic-assisted Gynecologic Surgery in an Elderly Population: A Comparison Study
    Vo, E. H.
    Moreno, A. E.
    Bhattarai, B.
    Patel, S.
    Farley, J. H.
    Monk, B. J.
    Willmott, L. J.
    Chase, D. M.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 147 (01) : 204 - 205
  • [2] Robotic-assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology
    Alkatout, I.
    Maass, N.
    GYNAKOLOGE, 2016, 49 (12): : 906 - +
  • [3] Robotic-assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology
    Sinno, Abdulrahman K.
    Fader, Amanda N.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2014, 102 (04) : 922 - 932
  • [4] IS ROBOTIC-ASSISTED SURGERY SAFE IN THE ELDERLY POPULATION? AN ANALYSIS OF GYNECOLOGIC PROCEDURES
    Aloisi, A.
    Tseng, J.
    Sandadi, S.
    Callery, R.
    Feinberg, J.
    Kuhn, T.
    Gardner, G.
    Sonoda, Y.
    Jewell, E.
    Zivanovic, O.
    Abu-Rustum, N.
    Leitao, M., Jr.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2018, 28 : 970 - 970
  • [5] Updates and Controversies of Robotic-Assisted Surgery in Gynecologic Surgery
    Varghese, Aaron
    Doglioli, Marisol
    Fader, Amanda N.
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 62 (04): : 733 - 748
  • [6] Anesthetic Considerations in Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery
    Kaye, Alan D.
    Vadivelu, Nalini
    Ahuja, Nitin
    Mitra, Sukanya
    Silasi, Dan
    Urman, Richard D.
    OCHSNER JOURNAL, 2013, 13 (04): : 517 - 524
  • [7] MAUDE: Analysis of Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery
    Manoucheri, Elmira
    Fuchs-Weizman, Noga
    Cohen, Sarah L.
    Wang, Karen C.
    Einarsson, Jon
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 21 (04) : 592 - 595
  • [8] Residency Training in Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery
    Galloway, Michael L.
    Dhanraj, David N.
    Ventolini, Gary
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY, 2012, 28 (03) : 192 - 196
  • [9] Trendelenburg Position in Gynecologic Robotic-Assisted Surgery
    Ghomi, Ali
    Kramer, Christina
    Askari, Reza
    Chavan, Niraj R.
    Einarsson, Jon I.
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 19 (04) : 485 - 489
  • [10] Robotic-Assisted Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology: Hype or Hope
    Singhal S.
    Indian Journal of Gynecologic Oncology, 2017, 15 (3)