Calibration methodology of low-cost sensors for high-quality monitoring of fine particulate matter

被引:20
|
作者
Aix, Marie-Laure [1 ]
Schmitz, Sean [2 ]
Bicout, Dominique J. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, UMR 5525, VetAgro Sup,Grenoble INP,TIMC, F-38000 Grenoble, France
[2] Helmholtz Ctr Potsdam, Res Inst Sustainabil, Berliner Str 130, D-14467 Potsdam, Germany
[3] Domaine Merci, Lab TIMC, F-38706 La Tronche, France
关键词
Air pollution; PM1; PM(2.)5; PM10; Dust events; Sensors calibration; Machine learning; LABORATORY EVALUATION; AIR-POLLUTION; SIZE; NETWORKS; AMBIENT; NO2;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164063
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Low concentrations of pollutants may already be associated with significant health effects. An accurate assessment of individual exposure to pollutants therefore requires measuring pollutant concentrations at the finest possible spatial and temporal scales. Low-cost sensors (LCS) of particulate matter (PM) meet this need so well that their use is constantly growing worldwide. However, everyone agrees that LCSmust be calibrated before use. Several calibration studies have already been published, but there is not yet a standardized and well-established methodology for PMsensors. In this work, we develop a method combining an adaptation of an approach developed for gas-phase pollutants with a dust event preprocessing to calibrate PMLCS (PMS7003) commonly used in urban environments. Fromthe selection of outliers to model tuning and error estimation, the developed protocol allows to analyze, process and calibrate LCS data using multilinear (MLR) and randomforest (RFR) regressions for comparison with a reference instrument. We demonstrate that the calibration performance was very good for PM1 and PM2.5 but turns out less good for PM10 (R-2= 0.94, RMSE= 0.55 mu g/m(3), NRMSE= 12% for PM1 with MLR, R-2= 0.92, RMSE= 0.70 mu g/m(3), NRMSE= 12% for PM2.5 with RFR and R-2= 0.54, RMSE= 2.98 mu g/m(3), NRMSE= 27% for PM10 with RFR). Dust events removal significantly improved LCS accuracy for PM2.5 (11% increase of R2 and 49% decrease ofRMSE) but no significant changes for PM1. Best calibration models included internal relative humidity and temperature for PM2.5 and only internal relative humidity for PM1. It turns out that PM10 cannot be properly measured and calibrated because of technical limitations of the PMS7003 sensor. This work therefore provides guidelines for PM LCS calibration. This represents a first step toward standardizing calibration protocols and facilitating collaborative research.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Fine particle mass monitoring with low-cost sensors: Corrections and long-term performance evaluation
    Malings, Carl
    Tanzer, Rebecca
    Hauryliuk, Aliaksei
    Saha, Provat K.
    Robinson, Allen L.
    Presto, Albert A.
    Subramanian, R.
    AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 54 (02) : 160 - 174
  • [42] A Deep Calibration Method for Low-Cost Air Monitoring Sensors With Multilevel Sequence Modeling
    Yu, Haomin
    Li, Qingyong
    Wang, Rao
    Chen, Zechuan
    Zhang, Yingjun
    Geng, Yangli-ao
    Zhang, Ling
    Cui, Houxin
    Zhang, Ke
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2020, 69 (09) : 7167 - 7179
  • [43] Size-Resolved Field Performance of Low-Cost Sensors for Particulate Matter Air Pollution
    Rueda, Emilio Molina
    Carter, Ellison
    L'Orange, Christian
    Quinn, Casey
    Volckens, John
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY LETTERS, 2023, 10 (03) : 247 - 253
  • [44] How to Get the Best from Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors: Guidelines and Practical Recommendations
    Brattich, Erika
    Bracci, Alessandro
    Zappi, Alessandro
    Morozzi, Pietro
    Di Sabatino, Silvana
    Porcu, Federico
    Di Nicola, Francesca
    Tositti, Laura
    SENSORS, 2020, 20 (11) : 1 - 33
  • [45] Designing a low-cost wireless sensor network for particulate matter monitoring: Implementation, calibration, and field-test
    Zafra-Perez, A.
    Medina-Garcia, J.
    Boente, C.
    Gomez-Galan, J. A.
    de la Campa, A. Sanchez
    de la Rosa, J. D.
    ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2024, 15 (09)
  • [46] EEATC: A Novel Calibration Approach for Low-Cost Sensors
    Narayana, M. V.
    Jalihal, Devendra
    Nagendra, S. M. Shiva
    IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2023, 23 (19) : 23500 - 23511
  • [47] In chamber calibration and performance evaluation of air quality low-cost sensors
    Agrawal, Deepali
    Saini, Anil Kumar
    Rai, Aakash Chand
    Kala, Prateek
    ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2024, 15 (12)
  • [48] Calibration of Low-cost Sensors for Measurement of Indoor Particulate Matter Concentrations via Laboratory/Field Evaluation
    Kim, Doheon
    Shin, Dongmin
    Hwang, Jungho
    AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (08)
  • [49] Reliable Low-Cost Air Quality Monitoring Using Off-The-Shelf Sensors and Statistical Calibration
    Drajic, Dejan D.
    Gligoric, Nenad R.
    ELEKTRONIKA IR ELEKTROTECHNIKA, 2020, 26 (02) : 32 - 41
  • [50] Evaluation of calibration performance of a low-cost particulate matter sensor using collocated and distant NO2
    Ko, Kabseok
    Cho, Seokheon
    Rao, Ramesh R.
    ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2024, 17 (10) : 3303 - 3322