Calibration methodology of low-cost sensors for high-quality monitoring of fine particulate matter

被引:20
|
作者
Aix, Marie-Laure [1 ]
Schmitz, Sean [2 ]
Bicout, Dominique J. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, UMR 5525, VetAgro Sup,Grenoble INP,TIMC, F-38000 Grenoble, France
[2] Helmholtz Ctr Potsdam, Res Inst Sustainabil, Berliner Str 130, D-14467 Potsdam, Germany
[3] Domaine Merci, Lab TIMC, F-38706 La Tronche, France
关键词
Air pollution; PM1; PM(2.)5; PM10; Dust events; Sensors calibration; Machine learning; LABORATORY EVALUATION; AIR-POLLUTION; SIZE; NETWORKS; AMBIENT; NO2;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164063
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Low concentrations of pollutants may already be associated with significant health effects. An accurate assessment of individual exposure to pollutants therefore requires measuring pollutant concentrations at the finest possible spatial and temporal scales. Low-cost sensors (LCS) of particulate matter (PM) meet this need so well that their use is constantly growing worldwide. However, everyone agrees that LCSmust be calibrated before use. Several calibration studies have already been published, but there is not yet a standardized and well-established methodology for PMsensors. In this work, we develop a method combining an adaptation of an approach developed for gas-phase pollutants with a dust event preprocessing to calibrate PMLCS (PMS7003) commonly used in urban environments. Fromthe selection of outliers to model tuning and error estimation, the developed protocol allows to analyze, process and calibrate LCS data using multilinear (MLR) and randomforest (RFR) regressions for comparison with a reference instrument. We demonstrate that the calibration performance was very good for PM1 and PM2.5 but turns out less good for PM10 (R-2= 0.94, RMSE= 0.55 mu g/m(3), NRMSE= 12% for PM1 with MLR, R-2= 0.92, RMSE= 0.70 mu g/m(3), NRMSE= 12% for PM2.5 with RFR and R-2= 0.54, RMSE= 2.98 mu g/m(3), NRMSE= 27% for PM10 with RFR). Dust events removal significantly improved LCS accuracy for PM2.5 (11% increase of R2 and 49% decrease ofRMSE) but no significant changes for PM1. Best calibration models included internal relative humidity and temperature for PM2.5 and only internal relative humidity for PM1. It turns out that PM10 cannot be properly measured and calibrated because of technical limitations of the PMS7003 sensor. This work therefore provides guidelines for PM LCS calibration. This represents a first step toward standardizing calibration protocols and facilitating collaborative research.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Opportunities for Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors in Filter Emission Measurements
    Schwarz, Almuth D.
    Meyer, Joerg
    Dittler, Achim
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 41 (09) : 1826 - 1832
  • [32] Developing a Relative Humidity Correction for Low-Cost Sensors Measuring Ambient Particulate Matter
    Di Antonio, Andrea
    Popoola, Olalekan A. M.
    Ouyang, Bin
    Saffell, John
    Jones, Roderic L.
    SENSORS, 2018, 18 (09)
  • [33] Long-term Field Evaluation of Low-cost Particulate Matter Sensors in Nanjing
    Bai, Lu
    Huang, Lin
    Wang, Zhenglu
    Ying, Qi
    Zheng, Jun
    Shi, Xiaowen
    Hu, Jianlin
    AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (02) : 242 - 253
  • [34] Aerial monitoring of atmospheric particulate matter produced by open-pit mining using low-cost airborne sensors
    Zafra-Perez, Adrian
    Boente, Carlos
    Garcia-Diaz, Manuel
    Gomez-Galan, Juan Antonio
    de la Campa, Ana Sanchez
    de la Rosa, Jesus D.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 904
  • [35] Application of low-cost particulate matter sensors for air quality monitoring and exposure assessment in underground mines: A review
    Amoah, Nana A.
    Xu, Guang
    Wang, Yang
    Li, Jiayu
    Zou, Yongming
    Nie, Baisheng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MINERALS METALLURGY AND MATERIALS, 2022, 29 (08) : 1475 - 1490
  • [36] Intelligent Calibration and Virtual Sensing for Integrated Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors
    Zaidan, Martha Arbayani
    Hossein Motlagh, Naser
    Fung, Pak L.
    Lu, David
    Timonen, Hilkka
    Kuula, Joel
    Niemi, Jarkko V.
    Tarkoma, Sasu
    Petaja, Tuukka
    Kulmala, Markku
    Hussein, Tareq
    IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2020, 20 (22) : 13638 - 13652
  • [37] Quantitative Analysis for Application Specific Calibration Approaches for Low-Cost Sensors for Air Quality Monitoring
    Narayana M.V.
    Jalihal D.
    Nagendra S.S.M.
    IEEJ Transactions on Electronics, Information and Systems, 2022, 140 (10) : 1166 - 1171
  • [38] Performance calibration of low-cost and portable particular matter (PM) sensors
    Liu, Di
    Zhang, Qiang
    Jiang, Jingkun
    Chen, Da-Ren
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL SCIENCE, 2017, 112 : 1 - 10
  • [39] Advantages and challenges of the implementation of a low-cost particulate matter monitoring system as a decision-making tool
    Caquilpan P, Victor
    Aros G, Gabriel
    Elgueta A, Sebastian
    Sepulveda K, Gonzalo
    Sierralta J, Carlos
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2019, 191 (11)
  • [40] In-situ validation of embedded physics-based calibration in low-cost particulate matter sensor for urban air quality monitoring
    Feng, Zikang
    Zheng, Lina
    Ren, Bilin
    URBAN CLIMATE, 2025, 59