Calibration methodology of low-cost sensors for high-quality monitoring of fine particulate matter

被引:20
|
作者
Aix, Marie-Laure [1 ]
Schmitz, Sean [2 ]
Bicout, Dominique J. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, UMR 5525, VetAgro Sup,Grenoble INP,TIMC, F-38000 Grenoble, France
[2] Helmholtz Ctr Potsdam, Res Inst Sustainabil, Berliner Str 130, D-14467 Potsdam, Germany
[3] Domaine Merci, Lab TIMC, F-38706 La Tronche, France
关键词
Air pollution; PM1; PM(2.)5; PM10; Dust events; Sensors calibration; Machine learning; LABORATORY EVALUATION; AIR-POLLUTION; SIZE; NETWORKS; AMBIENT; NO2;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164063
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Low concentrations of pollutants may already be associated with significant health effects. An accurate assessment of individual exposure to pollutants therefore requires measuring pollutant concentrations at the finest possible spatial and temporal scales. Low-cost sensors (LCS) of particulate matter (PM) meet this need so well that their use is constantly growing worldwide. However, everyone agrees that LCSmust be calibrated before use. Several calibration studies have already been published, but there is not yet a standardized and well-established methodology for PMsensors. In this work, we develop a method combining an adaptation of an approach developed for gas-phase pollutants with a dust event preprocessing to calibrate PMLCS (PMS7003) commonly used in urban environments. Fromthe selection of outliers to model tuning and error estimation, the developed protocol allows to analyze, process and calibrate LCS data using multilinear (MLR) and randomforest (RFR) regressions for comparison with a reference instrument. We demonstrate that the calibration performance was very good for PM1 and PM2.5 but turns out less good for PM10 (R-2= 0.94, RMSE= 0.55 mu g/m(3), NRMSE= 12% for PM1 with MLR, R-2= 0.92, RMSE= 0.70 mu g/m(3), NRMSE= 12% for PM2.5 with RFR and R-2= 0.54, RMSE= 2.98 mu g/m(3), NRMSE= 27% for PM10 with RFR). Dust events removal significantly improved LCS accuracy for PM2.5 (11% increase of R2 and 49% decrease ofRMSE) but no significant changes for PM1. Best calibration models included internal relative humidity and temperature for PM2.5 and only internal relative humidity for PM1. It turns out that PM10 cannot be properly measured and calibrated because of technical limitations of the PMS7003 sensor. This work therefore provides guidelines for PM LCS calibration. This represents a first step toward standardizing calibration protocols and facilitating collaborative research.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Field calibration of fine particulate matter low-cost sensors in a highly industrialized semi-arid conurbation
    Villarreal-Marines, Mariana
    Perez-Rodriguez, Michael
    Mancilla, Yasmany
    Ortiz, Gabriela
    Mendoza, Alberto
    NPJ CLIMATE AND ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCE, 2024, 7 (01):
  • [22] Evaluation and calibration of low-cost off-the-shelf particulate matter sensors using machine learning techniques
    Ghamari, Mohammad
    Kamangir, Hamid
    Arezoo, Keyvan
    Alipour, Khalil
    IET WIRELESS SENSOR SYSTEMS, 2022, 12 (5-6) : 134 - 148
  • [23] Smart Multi-Sensor Calibration of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Monitors
    Villanueva, Edwin
    Espezua, Soledad
    Castelar, George
    Diaz, Kyara
    Ingaroca, Erick
    SENSORS, 2023, 23 (07)
  • [24] Calibration of PurpleAir low-cost particulate matter sensors: model development for air quality under high relative humidity conditions
    Mathieu-Campbell, Martine E.
    Guo, Chuqi
    Grieshop, Andrew P.
    Richmond-Bryant, Jennifer
    ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2024, 17 (22) : 6735 - 6749
  • [25] Indoor Household Particulate Matter Measurements Using a Network of Low-cost Sensors
    Hegde, Shruti
    Min, Kyeong T.
    Moore, James
    Lundrigan, Philip
    Patwari, Neal
    Collingwood, Scott
    Balch, Alfred
    Kelly, Kerry E.
    AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (02) : 381 - 394
  • [26] Validation of In-field Calibration for Low-Cost Sensors Measuring Ambient Particulate Matter in Kolkata, India
    Nobell, Siddharth
    Majumdar, Arnab
    Mukherjee, Shovon
    Chakraborty, Sukumar
    Chatterjee, Sanjoy
    Bose, Soumitra
    Dutta, Anindita
    Sethuraman, Sandhya
    Westervelt, Daniel M.
    Sengupta, Shairik
    Basu, Rakhi
    McNeill, V. Faye
    AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (11)
  • [27] A novel application of mobile low-cost sensors for atmospheric particulate matter monitoring in open-pit mines
    Zafra-Perez, A.
    Boente, C.
    Sanchez de la Campa, A.
    Gomez-Galan, J. A.
    de la Rosa, J. D.
    ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION, 2023, 29
  • [28] One-Point Calibration of Low-Cost Sensors for Particulate Air Matter (PM) Concentration Measurement
    Russi, Luigi
    Guidorzi, Paolo
    Semprini, Giovanni
    Trentini, Arianna
    Pulvirenti, Beatrice
    SENSORS, 2025, 25 (03)
  • [29] A novel methodology for determining low-cost fine particulate matter street sweeping routes
    Blazquez, Carola A.
    Beghelh, Alejandra
    Meneses, Veronica P.
    JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2012, 62 (02) : 242 - 251
  • [30] Evaluation of Low-Cost Particulate Matter (PM) Sensors: A Preliminary Investigation
    Qian, Defeng
    Pang, Zhihong
    O'Neill, Zheng
    2018 ASHRAE ANNUAL CONFERENCE, 2018,