Calibration methodology of low-cost sensors for high-quality monitoring of fine particulate matter

被引:20
|
作者
Aix, Marie-Laure [1 ]
Schmitz, Sean [2 ]
Bicout, Dominique J. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, UMR 5525, VetAgro Sup,Grenoble INP,TIMC, F-38000 Grenoble, France
[2] Helmholtz Ctr Potsdam, Res Inst Sustainabil, Berliner Str 130, D-14467 Potsdam, Germany
[3] Domaine Merci, Lab TIMC, F-38706 La Tronche, France
关键词
Air pollution; PM1; PM(2.)5; PM10; Dust events; Sensors calibration; Machine learning; LABORATORY EVALUATION; AIR-POLLUTION; SIZE; NETWORKS; AMBIENT; NO2;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164063
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Low concentrations of pollutants may already be associated with significant health effects. An accurate assessment of individual exposure to pollutants therefore requires measuring pollutant concentrations at the finest possible spatial and temporal scales. Low-cost sensors (LCS) of particulate matter (PM) meet this need so well that their use is constantly growing worldwide. However, everyone agrees that LCSmust be calibrated before use. Several calibration studies have already been published, but there is not yet a standardized and well-established methodology for PMsensors. In this work, we develop a method combining an adaptation of an approach developed for gas-phase pollutants with a dust event preprocessing to calibrate PMLCS (PMS7003) commonly used in urban environments. Fromthe selection of outliers to model tuning and error estimation, the developed protocol allows to analyze, process and calibrate LCS data using multilinear (MLR) and randomforest (RFR) regressions for comparison with a reference instrument. We demonstrate that the calibration performance was very good for PM1 and PM2.5 but turns out less good for PM10 (R-2= 0.94, RMSE= 0.55 mu g/m(3), NRMSE= 12% for PM1 with MLR, R-2= 0.92, RMSE= 0.70 mu g/m(3), NRMSE= 12% for PM2.5 with RFR and R-2= 0.54, RMSE= 2.98 mu g/m(3), NRMSE= 27% for PM10 with RFR). Dust events removal significantly improved LCS accuracy for PM2.5 (11% increase of R2 and 49% decrease ofRMSE) but no significant changes for PM1. Best calibration models included internal relative humidity and temperature for PM2.5 and only internal relative humidity for PM1. It turns out that PM10 cannot be properly measured and calibrated because of technical limitations of the PMS7003 sensor. This work therefore provides guidelines for PM LCS calibration. This represents a first step toward standardizing calibration protocols and facilitating collaborative research.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] From low-cost sensors to high-quality data: A summary of challenges and best practices for effectively calibrating low-cost particulate matter mass sensors
    Giordano, Michael R.
    Malings, Carl
    Pandis, Spyros N.
    Presto, Albert A.
    McNeill, V. F.
    Westervelt, Daniel M.
    Beekmann, Matthias
    Subramanian, R.
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL SCIENCE, 2021, 158
  • [2] Development of a calibration chamber to evaluate the performance of low-cost particulate matter sensors
    Sayahi, T.
    Kaufman, D.
    Becnel, T.
    Kaur, K.
    Butterfield, A. E.
    Collingwood, S.
    Zhang, Y.
    Gaillardon, P. -E.
    Kelly, K. E.
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2019, 255
  • [3] Calibration of low-cost particulate matter sensors for coal dust monitoring
    Amoah, Nana A.
    Xu, Guang
    Kumar, Ashish Ranjan
    Wang, Yang
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 859
  • [4] Calibration Method for Particulate Matter Low-Cost Sensors Used in Ambient Air Quality Monitoring and Research
    Jagatha, Janani Venkatraman
    Klausnitzer, Andre
    Chacon-Mateos, Miriam
    Laquai, Bernd
    Nieuwkoop, Evert
    van der Mark, Peter
    Vogt, Ulrich
    Schneider, Christoph
    SENSORS, 2021, 21 (12)
  • [5] Investigation of Low-Cost and Optical Particulate Matter Sensors for Ambient Monitoring
    Rogulski, Mariusz
    Badyda, Artur
    ATMOSPHERE, 2020, 11 (10)
  • [6] Evaluation and calibration of low-cost particulate matter sensors for respirable coal mine dust monitoring
    Feng, Zikang
    Zheng, Lina
    Zhang, Xuehan
    Liu, Jia
    Xue, Ning
    Wang, Mengmeng
    AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 58 (02) : 158 - 169
  • [7] Field Evaluation of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors in Beijing
    Mei, Han
    Han, Pengfei
    Wang, Yinan
    Zeng, Ning
    Liu, Di
    Cai, Qixiang
    Deng, Zhaoze
    Wang, Yinghong
    Pan, Yuepeng
    Tang, Xiao
    SENSORS, 2020, 20 (16) : 1 - 17
  • [8] Using Low-Cost Sensors for Measuring and Monitoring Particulate Matter with a Focus on Fine and Ultrafine Particles
    Kiresova, Simona
    Guzan, Milan
    Sobota, Branislav
    ATMOSPHERE, 2023, 14 (02)
  • [9] Low-cost sensors for measuring airborne particulate matter: Field evaluation and calibration at a South-Eastern European site
    Kosmopoulos, G.
    Salamalikis, V.
    Pandis, S. N.
    Yannopoulos, P.
    Bloutsos, A. A.
    Kazantzidis, A.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 748
  • [10] Regression methods in the calibration of low-cost sensors for ambient particulate matter measurements
    Badura, Marek
    Batog, Piotr
    Drzeniecka-Osiadacz, Anetta
    Modzel, Piotr
    SN APPLIED SCIENCES, 2019, 1 (06):