Spillover Effects of Preventive Regulation and Corporate R&D Investment Catering: Evidence from China

被引:21
作者
Yu, Yan [1 ,3 ]
Lee, Yi-Tsung [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Technol & Business Univ, Business Sch, Dept Finance, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Guanghua Sch Management, Dept Accounitng, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Technol & Business Univ, Business Sch, 11-33 Fucheng Rd, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
R&D expense inquiry letter (RDIL); R&D investment intensity; deterrence theory; R&D manipulation; product market competition; MARKET;
D O I
10.1080/1540496X.2023.2218969
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper explores the spillover effect of proactive preventive regulation represented by R&D expense inquiry letters (hereafter, RDILs) and its impact mechanism. Using deterrence theory and Chinese A-share listed firms from 2015-2020, we find that the industry receiving RDILs has a regulation effect on the R&D investment intensity catering motive of the non-receiving firms in the industry. That is, there is an industry spillover effect of RDILs regulation. The results of the regulatory mechanism analysis show that the industry spillover effect of RDILs regulation is more pronounced for non-receiving firms with more severe R&D manipulation intensity or weaker product market competitive positions. Further analysis shows that the inclusion of peer comparison questions in the RDILs increases the industry spillover effect of the inquiry letter regulation. We also find that the industry spillover effects of RDILs regulation result in higher future innovation quality for non-receiving firms. Overall, our study enriches our understanding of the effectiveness of inquiry letter regulation and provides some guidance for regulators' regulatory practice.
引用
收藏
页码:3391 / 3401
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [21] Can rising labor costs boost private sector R&D investment?: Evidence from a survey of Chinese private firms
    Deng, Chuyao
    Liu, Yang
    Gu, Doudou
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (08):
  • [22] R&D and firm performance: evidence from the Indian pharmaceutical industry
    Sharma, Chandan
    JOURNAL OF THE ASIA PACIFIC ECONOMY, 2012, 17 (02) : 332 - 342
  • [23] Interrelationship and Mutual Influence of Institutional Investment, Corporate Responsibility, and Environmental Management: Evidence from China
    Fang, Ming
    Alrefaei, Ammar Saeed
    JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2024,
  • [24] The Impact of Purchase Subsidy on Enterprises' R&D Efforts: Evidence from China's New Energy Vehicle Industry
    Jiang, Cailou
    Zhang, Ying
    Zhao, Qun
    Wu, Chong
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (03)
  • [25] The spillover effects in the "Energy-Carbon-Stock" system-Evidence from China
    Tang, Chun
    Liu, Xiaoxing
    Chen, Guangkun
    ENERGY, 2023, 278
  • [26] Distracted institutional shareholders and managerial myopia: Evidence from R&D expenses
    Li Yueting
    Wang Jianling
    Wu Xuan
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 29 : 30 - 40
  • [27] Stock Liquidity and Investment Efficiency: Evidence from the New Regulation of Insider Selling in China
    Zhang, Mengqin
    He, Yi
    Zhang, Surui
    Zhang, Xiang
    Sindakis, Stavros
    Showkat, Saloome
    JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2024, 15 (02) : 8563 - 8587
  • [28] Effects of advertising and R&D on spillovers from a rival's bankruptcy
    Jindal, Niket
    Slotegraaf, Rebecca J.
    JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 2024, 52 (02) : 349 - 369
  • [29] Assessing the impact path of air quality on enterprise R&D investment: Empirical evidence from dual perspectives of investor sentiment and government concern
    Yang, Jialiang
    He, Dan
    Qureshi, Naveed Akhtar
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [30] Did R&D Firms Used to Patent? Evidence from the First Innovation Surveys
    Nicholas, Tom
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC HISTORY, 2011, 71 (04) : 1032 - 1059