Spillover Effects of Preventive Regulation and Corporate R&D Investment Catering: Evidence from China

被引:13
|
作者
Yu, Yan [1 ,3 ]
Lee, Yi-Tsung [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Technol & Business Univ, Business Sch, Dept Finance, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Guanghua Sch Management, Dept Accounitng, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Technol & Business Univ, Business Sch, 11-33 Fucheng Rd, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
R&D expense inquiry letter (RDIL); R&D investment intensity; deterrence theory; R&D manipulation; product market competition; MARKET;
D O I
10.1080/1540496X.2023.2218969
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper explores the spillover effect of proactive preventive regulation represented by R&D expense inquiry letters (hereafter, RDILs) and its impact mechanism. Using deterrence theory and Chinese A-share listed firms from 2015-2020, we find that the industry receiving RDILs has a regulation effect on the R&D investment intensity catering motive of the non-receiving firms in the industry. That is, there is an industry spillover effect of RDILs regulation. The results of the regulatory mechanism analysis show that the industry spillover effect of RDILs regulation is more pronounced for non-receiving firms with more severe R&D manipulation intensity or weaker product market competitive positions. Further analysis shows that the inclusion of peer comparison questions in the RDILs increases the industry spillover effect of the inquiry letter regulation. We also find that the industry spillover effects of RDILs regulation result in higher future innovation quality for non-receiving firms. Overall, our study enriches our understanding of the effectiveness of inquiry letter regulation and provides some guidance for regulators' regulatory practice.
引用
收藏
页码:3391 / 3401
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Localization, knowledge spillover, and R&D investment: Evidence of Chinese cities
    Qiao, Yu
    Ding, Chengri
    Liu, Jianhua
    JOURNAL OF URBAN MANAGEMENT, 2019, 8 (02) : 303 - 315
  • [22] Pay for accounting performance and R&D investment: Evidence from China
    Chen, Shenglan
    Lin, Bingxuan
    Lu, Rui
    Ma, Hui
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2016, 44 : 142 - 153
  • [23] Business Group Affiliation and R&D Investment: Evidence from China
    Lou, Zhukun
    Chen, Siyu
    Jia, Yingya
    Yu, Xiaoyu
    EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2021, 57 (08) : 2307 - 2322
  • [24] Intergenerational power gap and R&D investment: Evidence from China
    Zhao, Yong
    Yang, Xi
    Xin, Daqi
    Zhou, Wencang
    Zhang, Shuaijun
    Wang, Liying
    JOURNAL OF INNOVATION & KNOWLEDGE, 2023, 8 (02):
  • [25] Corporate finance policies, subsidies and R&D: Evidence from China
    Huang, Wei
    Sattar, Mahnoor
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCE & ECONOMICS, 2021, 26 (03) : 3875 - 3891
  • [26] Property rights protection and corporate R&D: Evidence from China
    Lin, Chen
    Lin, Ping
    Song, Frank
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2010, 93 (01) : 49 - 62
  • [27] Characteristics of Corporate R&D Investment in Emerging Markets: Evidence from Manufacturing Industry in China and South Korea
    Xu, Jian
    Sim, Jae-Woo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (09)
  • [28] Democracy and corporate R&D investment
    Tran, Quoc Trung
    BORSA ISTANBUL REVIEW, 2022, 22 (03) : 465 - 476
  • [29] The Effects of Government R&D Investment and Policy Ambiguity on Regional Innovation: Evidence from China
    Liu, Qiong
    Guo, Junhua
    JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2024,
  • [30] Catering Effects in Corporate Dividend Policy: Evidence from China
    Shi Jinyan
    Guo Chenyang
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH (2015) INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FINANCIAL RISK AND CORPORATE FINANCE MANAGEMENT, 2015, : 58 - 63