Spillover Effects of Preventive Regulation and Corporate R&D Investment Catering: Evidence from China

被引:21
作者
Yu, Yan [1 ,3 ]
Lee, Yi-Tsung [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Technol & Business Univ, Business Sch, Dept Finance, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Guanghua Sch Management, Dept Accounitng, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Technol & Business Univ, Business Sch, 11-33 Fucheng Rd, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
R&D expense inquiry letter (RDIL); R&D investment intensity; deterrence theory; R&D manipulation; product market competition; MARKET;
D O I
10.1080/1540496X.2023.2218969
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper explores the spillover effect of proactive preventive regulation represented by R&D expense inquiry letters (hereafter, RDILs) and its impact mechanism. Using deterrence theory and Chinese A-share listed firms from 2015-2020, we find that the industry receiving RDILs has a regulation effect on the R&D investment intensity catering motive of the non-receiving firms in the industry. That is, there is an industry spillover effect of RDILs regulation. The results of the regulatory mechanism analysis show that the industry spillover effect of RDILs regulation is more pronounced for non-receiving firms with more severe R&D manipulation intensity or weaker product market competitive positions. Further analysis shows that the inclusion of peer comparison questions in the RDILs increases the industry spillover effect of the inquiry letter regulation. We also find that the industry spillover effects of RDILs regulation result in higher future innovation quality for non-receiving firms. Overall, our study enriches our understanding of the effectiveness of inquiry letter regulation and provides some guidance for regulators' regulatory practice.
引用
收藏
页码:3391 / 3401
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Do Inquiry Letters Curb Corporate Catering Motives of High Sustainable R&D Investment? Empirical Evidence from China
    Yu, Yan
    Lee, Yi-Tsung
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (12)
  • [2] Government innovation subsidy, monetary policy, and corporate R&D investment: evidence from China
    Zhang, Yupeng
    Huang, Min
    Kim, Yoonbai
    Wang, Qian
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION, 2023, 31 (02) : 356 - 374
  • [3] Minimum wage effects on firms' R&D investment: Evidence from China
    Wei, Zhihua
    Ren, Zerong
    Zhu, Caiyun
    Zhou, Yisihong
    Liu, Xiaowen
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2023, 87 : 287 - 305
  • [4] Climate risk and firms' R&D investment: Evidence from China
    Wang, Yong
    Wang, Chao
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2025, 99
  • [5] R&D investment, ESG performance and green innovation performance: evidence from China
    Xu, Jian
    Liu, Feng
    Shang, Yue
    KYBERNETES, 2021, 50 (03) : 737 - 756
  • [6] Fintech and R&D Evidence from China
    Fan, Chenguang
    Bae, Seongho
    Liu, Yu
    EAST ASIAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2024, 28 (03) : 315 - 357
  • [7] Does institutional ownership discourage investment in corporate R&D?
    Mishra, Chandra S.
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2022, 182
  • [8] R&D, export and investment decision: evidence from European firms
    Carboni, Oliviero A.
    Medda, Giuseppe
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2018, 50 (02) : 187 - 201
  • [9] Entrepreneurial Spillovers from Corporate R&D
    Babina, Tania
    Howell, Sabrina T.
    JOURNAL OF LABOR ECONOMICS, 2024, 42 (02) : 469 - 509
  • [10] R&D expenditures, ultimate ownership and future performance: Evidence from China
    Wang Ruiqi
    Wang, Fangjun
    Xu, Luying
    Yuan, Changhong
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2017, 71 : 47 - 54