En-route fast charging infrastructure planning and scheduling for battery electric bus systems

被引:19
|
作者
Wang, Xuedong [1 ]
Song, Ziqi [2 ]
Xu, Hongli [1 ]
Wang, Hua [3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Sch Engn & Management, Nanjing 210000, Peoples R China
[2] Utah State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Logan, UT 84322 USA
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Singapore 117576, Singapore
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Battery electric bus system; Infrastructure planning; Charging scheduling; En -route charging; Charging conflicts; COST; OPTIMIZATION; DEPLOYMENT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.trd.2023.103659
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The recent advancements toward fast charging technology enable electric buses to be re-charged at bus stops during passengers' boarding and alighting times. The costs of en-route charging can be substantially reduced through facility sharing among buses from multiple lines, which may, however, result in charging conflicts. This study investigates the charging infrastructure planning and scheduling for a battery electric bus (BEB) system, considering en-route charging and charging conflict avoidance. We introduced a station-based discrete-event approach to discretize the BEB operation system for an entire day. Subsequently, two models were established to determine the charging scheduling and infrastructure planning, which are further reformulated as linear mixed-integer programs. Dwelling times with- and without potential charging conflicts were distinguished in advance and processed separately to reduce the scale of the problem. Numerical examples demonstrated that the proposed models could be solved efficiently in a large BEB system, and cost-effective en-route charging is achievable.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Optimal en-route charging station locations for electric vehicles with heterogeneous range anxiety
    Zeng, Xueqi
    Xie, Chi
    Xu, Min
    Chen, Zhibin
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2024, 158
  • [22] A MILP-based Approach to Account for Battery Degradation in Electric Bus Charging Scheduling
    Saner, Can Berk
    Trivedi, Anupam
    Srinivasan, Dipti
    2022 IEEE PES 14TH ASIA-PACIFIC POWER AND ENERGY ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, APPEEC, 2022,
  • [23] Electric van-based robot deliveries with en-route charging
    Yu, Shaohua
    Puchinger, Jakob
    Sun, Shudong
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2024, 317 (03) : 806 - 826
  • [24] Electric bus charging scheduling on a bus network
    Zhou, Yu
    Meng, Qiang
    Ong, Ghim Ping
    Wang, Hua
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2024, 161
  • [25] Delivery routing for electric vehicles with en-route mobile battery swapping
    Xiao, Jiuhong
    Wang, Shuyi
    Xiao, Jianhua
    Huang, George Q.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2024, 192
  • [26] A robust coordinated charging scheduling approach for hybrid electric bus charging systems
    Huang, Di
    Zhang, Jinyu
    Liu, Zhiyuan
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 125
  • [27] Robust planning of dynamic wireless charging infrastructure for battery electric buses
    Liu, Zhaocai
    Song, Ziqi
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2017, 83 : 77 - 103
  • [28] Impact of Inductive Charging Infrastructure at Intersections on Battery Electric Bus Operations
    Wuertz, Samuel
    Niels, Tanja
    Bogenberger, Klaus
    Goehner, Ulrich
    2023 IEEE 26TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, ITSC, 2023, : 2665 - 2670
  • [29] Empirical Data Driven Approach for Modeling the Latent En-Route Charging Preference Behavior of Battery Electric Vehicle Users
    Li H.
    Chen Y.
    Yu L.
    Tu H.
    Tongji Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Tongji University, 2022, 50 (01): : 104 - 113
  • [30] Long-term strategic planning of inter-city fast charging infrastructure for battery electric vehicles
    Xie, Fei
    Liu, Changzheng
    Li, Shengyin
    Lin, Zhenhong
    Huang, Yongxi
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2018, 109 : 261 - 276