Adherence Disparities and Utilization Trends of Oncotype DX Assay: A National Cancer Database Study

被引:1
|
作者
Chen, Shuyi [1 ]
Thacker, Christopher [2 ]
Wang, Shengxuan [2 ]
Young, Katelyn A. [2 ]
Hoffman, Rebecca L. [2 ]
Blansfield, Joseph A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Geisinger Commonwealth Sch Med, 525 Pine St, Scranton, PA 18510 USA
[2] Geisinger Surg Inst, Danville, PA USA
关键词
Breast cancer; Health disparity; Oncotype Dx; 21-GENE RECURRENCE SCORE; INVASIVE BREAST-CANCER; DECISION-MAKING; UNITED-STATES; CHEMOTHERAPY; PREDICTION; EXPRESSION; TAMOXIFEN; UTILITY; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2023.01.002
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Oncotype Dx (ODX) is a genetic assay that analyzes tumor recurrence risk and provides chemotherapy recommendations for T1-T2 stage, hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-negative, and nodal-negative breast cancer pa-tients. Despite its established validity, the utilization of this assay is suboptimal. The study aims to evaluate factors that are associated with adherence rate with the testing guidelines and examine changes in utilization trends. Methods: This is a retrospective study, utilizing data from the National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2017. Patients who met the ODX testing guidelines were first evaluated for testing adherence. Secondly, all patients who underwent ODX testing were assessed to evaluate the trend in ODX utilization. Results: A total of 429,648 patients met the criteria for ODX, and 43.4% of this population underwent testing. Advanced age, racial minorities, low-income status, well-differentiated tumor grade, uninsured status, and treatment at community cancer centers were associ-ated with a decreased likelihood of receiving ODX in eligible patients. Additionally, a notable amount of testing was performed on patients who did not meet the ODX testing criteria. Among the 295,326 patients that underwent ODX testing, 16.6% of patients were node-positive and 1.8% had T3 or T4 stage tumors. Conclusions: A considerable number of patients who were eligible for ODX did not receive it, indicating potential barriers to care and disparities in breast cancer treatment. ODX usage has been expanded to broader patient populations, indicating more research is needed to validate the effectiveness of the assay in these patient groups.(c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 73
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patient and physician factors associated with Oncotype DX and adjuvant chemotherapy utilization for breast cancer patients in New Hampshire, 2010-2016
    Schwedhelm, Thomas M.
    Rees, Judy R.
    Onega, Tracy
    Zipkin, Ronnie J.
    Schaefer, Andrew
    Celaya, Maria O.
    Moen, Erika L.
    BMC CANCER, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [22] Economic assesment of the routine use of Oncotype DX® assay for early breast cancer in Franche-Comte region
    Nerich, Virginie
    Curtit, Elsa
    Bazan, Fernando
    Montcuquet, Philippe
    Villanueva, Cristian
    Chaigneau, Loic
    Cals, Laurent
    Meneveau, Nathalie
    Dobi, Erion
    Altmotlak, Hamadi
    Algros, Marie-Paule
    Choulot, Marie-Jeanne
    Nallet, Gilles
    Limat, Samuel
    Mansion, Sylvie
    Pivot, Xavier
    BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2014, 101 (7-8) : 681 - 689
  • [23] Impact of Oncotype DX testing on adjuvant treatment decisions in patients with early breast cancer: A single-center study in the United Arab Emirates
    Jaafar, Hassan
    Al Bashir, Mohamed
    Taher, Ali
    Qawasmeh, Khaled
    Jaloudi, Mohammed
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 10 (04) : 354 - 360
  • [24] Trends and Patterns of Utilization of Hypofractionated Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: A National Cancer Database Analysis
    Venigalla, Sriram
    Guttmann, David M.
    Jain, Varsha
    Sharma, Sonam
    Freedman, Gary M.
    Shabason, Jacob E.
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2018, 18 (05) : E899 - E908
  • [25] The Oncotype Dx Assay in ER-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer Patients: A Real Life Experience from a Single Cancer Center
    Thibodeau, Stephane
    Voutsadakis, Ioannis A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF BREAST HEALTH, 2019, 15 (03) : 163 - 170
  • [26] Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Oncotype DX Test Receipt in a Statewide Population-Based Study
    Davis, Brigette A.
    Aminawung, Jenerius A.
    Abu-Khalaf, Maysa M.
    Evans, Suzanne B.
    Su, Kevin
    Mehta, Rajni
    Wang, Shi-Yi
    Gross, Cary P.
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2017, 15 (03): : 346 - 354
  • [27] COMPUTER-AIDED PROGNOSIS OF ER plus BREAST CANCER HISTOPATHOLOGY AND CORRELATING SURVIVAL OUTCOME WITH ONCOTYPE DX ASSAY
    Basavanhally, Ajay
    Xu, Jun
    Madabhushi, Anant
    Ganesan, Shridar
    2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING: FROM NANO TO MACRO, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2009, : 851 - +
  • [28] Disparities in Vulvar Cancer Reported by the National Cancer Database Influence of Sociodemographic Factors
    Chase, Dana M.
    Lin, Chun Chieh
    Craig, Christine D.
    Fedewa, Stacey A.
    Virgo, Katherine S.
    Farley, John H.
    Halpern, Michael
    Monk, Bradley J.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 126 (04) : 792 - 802
  • [29] The utility of the 21-gene Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® assay in node-negative breast cancer patients - the final analysis of the Polish real-life survey PONDx
    Jarzab, Michal
    Litwiniuk, Maria
    Innis, Paige
    Lacko, Aleksandra
    Enderle, Gesine
    Czartoryska-Arlukowicz, Bogumila
    Talerczyk, Malgorzata
    Streb, Joanna
    Wysocki, Piotr
    Suchodolska, Grazyna
    Szymanowski, Bartosz
    Duchnowska, Renata
    WSPOLCZESNA ONKOLOGIA-CONTEMPORARY ONCOLOGY, 2024, 28 (03): : 245 - 252
  • [30] Concordance of breast cancer biomarker status between routine immunohistochemistry/in situ hybridization and Oncotype DX qRT-PCR with investigation of discordance, a study of 591 cases
    Sechrist, Haley
    Glasgow, Akisha
    Bomeisl, Philip
    Gilmore, Hannah
    Harbhajanka, Aparna
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2020, 104 : 54 - 65