The impact of early remission on disease trajectory and patient outcomes in major depression disorder (MDD): A targeted literature review and microsimulation modeling approach based on the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) study

被引:3
作者
Arnaud, Alix [1 ]
Benner, Jennifer [2 ]
Suthoff, Ellison [1 ]
Werneburg, Brian [1 ]
Reinhart, Marcia [3 ]
Sussman, Matthew [2 ,5 ]
Kessler, Ronald C. [4 ]
机构
[1] Sage Therapeut Inc, Cambridge, MA USA
[2] Panalgo LLC, Boston, MA USA
[3] Tantalus Med Commun, Victoria, BC, Canada
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA USA
[5] One Lincoln St,29 th Floor, Boston, MA 02111 USA
关键词
Major depressive episode; Depression; Step therapy; Remission; Patient outcomes; Microsimulation model; TREATMENT-RESISTANT DEPRESSION; ECONOMIC BURDEN; EARLY RESPONSE; FOLLOW-UP; PREDICTORS; THERAPY; IMPROVEMENT; DURATION; EPISODE; COSTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jad.2022.12.147
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: While literature has suggested that the duration of a major depressive episode (MDE) may affect both symptomatic and functional outcomes in major depressive disorder (MDD), study designs are limited in their ability to isolate a causal relationship.Methods: A targeted literature review was conducted using the MEDLINE database to assess whether there was an association between (1) shorter duration of an MDE, or (2) increased rapidity of symptom improvement, and MDD outcomes in adult patients. Given findings from the literature, we hypothesized that rapid symptom improvement could be associated with other longer-term clinical outcomes and used a previously-developed microsimulation model to test this hypothesis. The base case of the model replicated step-therapy treatment patterns, for 10,000 simulated patients, based on lines of therapy related to standard of care, observed remission rates, and observed time to relapse from the STAR*D study. In alternative scenario analyses, the step 1 remission rate was varied by +25 % and +50 % from the base case value to simulate the potential impact of improved earlier remission on disease trajectory and patient-level clinical outcomes.Results: The literature review (N = 35 studies) suggests a statistically significant relationship between the duration of MDE or early symptom improvement and MDD outcomes. The microsimulation model corroborated these findings and demonstrated that increasing the rate of remission in step 1 results in patients experiencing decreased number of treatment steps, faster time to remission, decreased rate of reaching treatment-resistant depression, and delayed time to relapse. Limitations: Rates of relapse in STAR*D were deemed unreliable due to the high-loss of follow-up; rates of relapse for the MDD DTM were instead derived using parametric extrapolation methods (i.e., exponential, Weibull, log-logistic, Gaussian, log-normal, logistic). Adherence to treatment was assumed to be 100 %; however, non-adherence is expected to result in lower cumulative remission rates.Conclusion: Findings from the literature, coupled with quantification through a novel microsimulation model, demonstrate the potential impact of increased remission on disease trajectory and patient outcomes in MDD. While additional analyses with the model may be warranted to explore the impact of novel interventions on population health, including long-term outcomes (i.e., 5-year follow-up, lifetime follow-up), efforts by clinicians to increase remission early in the disease trajectory may improve long-term outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 272
页数:9
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [1] American Psychiatric Association, 2022, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, V5th, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596
  • [2] Direct and Indirect Cost Burden and Change of Employment Status in Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Matched-Cohort Study Using a US Commercial Claims Database
    Amos, Tony B.
    Tandon, Neeta
    Lefebvre, Patrick
    Pilon, Dominic
    Kamstra, Rhiannon L.
    Pivneva, Irina
    Greenberg, Paul E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 79 (02)
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2019, Clinical Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Depression Across Three Age Cohorts, DOI DOI 10.1037/E505892019-001
  • [4] Arnaud A., 2019, J Manag Care Spec Pharm, V25, pS1, DOI DOI 10.18553/JMCP.2019.25.10-A.S1
  • [5] Benner J, 2020, VALUE HEALTH, V23, pS589
  • [6] The efficacy and safety of aripiprazole as adjunctive therapy in major depressive disorder: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
    Berman, Robert M.
    Marcus, Ronald N.
    Swanink, Rene
    McQuade, Robert D.
    Carson, William H.
    Corey-Lisle, Patricia K.
    Khan, Arif
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2007, 68 (06) : 843 - 853
  • [7] Do early changes in the HAM-D-17 anxiety/somatization factor items affect the treatment outcome among depressed outpatients? Comparison of two controlled trials of St John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) versus a SSRI
    Bitran, Stella
    Farabaugh, Amy H.
    Ameral, Victoria E.
    LaRocca, Rachel A.
    Clain, Alisabet J.
    Fava, Maurizio
    Mischoulon, David
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2011, 26 (04) : 206 - 212
  • [8] Early Response and Remission as Predictors of a Good Outcome of a Major Depressive Episode at 12-Month Follow-Up: A Prospective, Longitudinal, Observational Study
    Ciudad, Antonio
    Alvarez, Enrique
    Roca, Miquel
    Baca, Enrique
    Caballero, Luis
    Garcia de Polavieja, Pepa
    Casillas, Marta
    Valladares, Amparo
    Gilaberte, Inmaculada
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 73 (02) : 185 - 191
  • [9] Identification of a claims data "signature" and economic consequences for treatment-resistant depression
    Corey-Lisle, PK
    Birnbaum, HG
    Greenberg, PE
    Marynchenko, MB
    Claxton, AJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 63 (08) : 717 - 726
  • [10] The impact of treatment-resistant depression on health care utilization and costs
    Crown, WH
    Finkelstein, S
    Berndt, ER
    Ling, D
    Poret, AW
    Rush, AJ
    Russell, JM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 63 (11) : 963 - 971