Administration of methylene blue in septic shock: pros and cons

被引:9
|
作者
Arias-Ortiz, Julian [1 ]
Vincent, Jean-Louis [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Costa Rica, Calderon Guardia Hosp, Dept Intens Care, San Jose, Costa Rica
[2] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Erasme Hosp, Dept Intens Care, Route Lennik 808, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Methylene blue; Vasopressors; Septic shock; Norepinephrine; Nitric oxide; NITRIC-OXIDE SYNTHASE; INFUSION;
D O I
10.1186/s13054-024-04839-w
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Septic shock typically requires the administration of vasopressors. Adrenergic agents remain the first choice, namely norepinephrine. However, their use to counteract life-threatening hypotension comes with potential adverse effects, so that non-adrenergic vasopressors may also be considered. The use of agents that act through different mechanisms may also provide an advantage. Nitric oxide (NO) is the main driver of the vasodilation that leads to hypotension in septic shock, so several agents have been tested to counteract its effects. The use of non-selective NO synthase inhibitors has been of questionable benefit. Methylene blue, an inhibitor of soluble guanylate cyclase, an important enzyme involved in the NO signaling pathway in the vascular smooth muscle cell, has also been proposed. However, more than 25 years since the first clinical evaluation of MB administration in septic shock, the safety and benefits of its use are still not fully established, and it should not be used routinely in clinical practice until further evidence of its efficacy is available.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Methylene blue? Therapeutic Alternative in the Management of Septic Shock Refractory to Norepinephrine
    Aragon-Benedi, Cristian
    Pascual-Bellosta, Ana
    Ortega-Lucea, Sonia
    Lacosta-Torrijos, Luisa
    Jimenez-Bernado, Teresa
    Martinez-Ubieto, Javier
    SIGNA VITAE, 2020, 16 (02) : 199 - 202
  • [32] Effect of methylene blue on hemodynamic and metabolic response in septic shock patients
    Luis-Silva, Fabio
    Menegueti, Mayra Goncalves
    Sepeda, Corina dos Reis
    Petroski-Moraes, Bruno C.
    Sato, Lucas
    Peres, Leandro Moreira
    Becari, Christiane
    Basile-Filho, Anibal
    Evora, Paulo R. B.
    Martins-Filho, Olindo Assis
    Auxiliadora-Martins, Maria
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (03) : E28599
  • [33] Is methylene blue, off-label use, effective in septic shock?
    Grillo Grillo, Candelaria Nieves
    Garcia Saiz, Maria Del Mar
    Martinez Alario, Jorge
    Mora Quintero, Maria Luisa
    Rodriguez Jimenez, Consuelo
    BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2018, 123 : 57 - 57
  • [34] METHYLENE BLUE ADMINISTRATION FOR ACUTE SEPTIC CARDIOMYOPATHY IN A SEVERELY BURNED PATIENT
    Schlesinger, J.
    Burger, C.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2014, 118 : S89 - S89
  • [35] METHYLENE BLUE ADMINISTRATION IN REFRACTORY VASOPLEGIC TOXIC SHOCK SYNDROME
    Taylor, Jonathan
    Nonas, Stephanie
    CHEST, 2020, 158 (04) : 902A - 902A
  • [36] Pros and Cons of Feeding the Septic Intensive Care Unit Patient
    Fremont, Richard D.
    Rice, Todd W.
    NUTRITION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2015, 30 (03) : 344 - 350
  • [37] The Pros and Cons of the PROs
    Thoma, Achilleas
    Eaves, Felmont F., III
    AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2018, 38 (03) : 343 - 345
  • [38] METHYLENE BLUE IN REFRACTORY SEPTIC SHOCK: LOSING OUR WAY FOR THE SAKE OF A MAP?
    Varghese, Cyril
    Demartino, Erin
    Ashley, Egan
    Jacobi, Jaclyn
    Lisa, Daniels
    Sharain, Korosh
    Clain, Jeremy
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 44 (12)
  • [39] METHYLENE BLUE INFUSION FOR CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS WITH CIRRHOSIS AND REFRACTORY SEPTIC SHOCK
    Philips, Cyriac A.
    Rajesh, Sasidharan
    George, Tom
    Ahamed, Rizwan
    Augustine, Philip
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 158 (06) : S611 - S612
  • [40] Comments on: Methylene blue? Therapeutic alternative in the management of septic shock refractory to norepinephrine
    Pasqualucci, Alberto
    Puntillo, Filomena
    Varrassi, Giustino
    SIGNA VITAE, 2021, 17 (01) : 219 - 220