A novel extension of the SYNTHSEP methodology for the optimal synthesis and design of supercritical CO2 cycles in waste heat recovery applications

被引:17
作者
Dal Cin, Enrico [1 ]
Lazzaretto, Andrea [1 ]
Toffolo, Andrea [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Ind Engn Dept, Via Venezia 1, I-35131 Padua, Italy
[2] Lulea Univ Technol, Div Energy Sci, Energy Engn, SE-97187 Lulea, Sweden
关键词
SYNTHSEP; Supercritical CO2 cycles; Waste heat recovery; Optimization; Evolutionary algorithm; Decarbonization; SUPERSTRUCTURE-FREE SYNTHESIS; THERMODYNAMIC OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS; PLANT STRUCTURE; BRAYTON-JOULE; POWER; RECOMPRESSION; SYSTEMS; TECHNOLOGIES; GENERATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116535
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The reduction of anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases requires decreasing the overall consumption of primary energy. Thus, waste heat recovery at medium-to-high temperature is an opportunity for generating electricity while reducing the need for primary resources. Recently, supercritical carbon dioxide power cycles (S-CO2) are emerging as a promising solution. However, a method lacks to simultaneously optimize their layout and design parameters, without relying on superstructures defined a priori. To this end, this paper suggests a novel extension of the superstructure free SYNTHSEP methodology, a bottom-up approach for the optimal synthesis and design of thermodynamic cycles, to handle also super-and transcritical cycles. An Evolutionary Algorithm combining elementary cycles makes it possible to define optimal S-CO2 configurations without limiting the search space of the optimization problem. The objective consists in finding the S-CO2 topology and design pa-rameters that maximize the mechanical power extractable from waste heat streams in the temperature range from 200 to 700 degrees C, typical of the industrial sector. Results demonstrate the capability of the method to find optimal cycle layouts for any given waste heat temperature, and to achieve, at the same conditions, cycle effi-ciencies up to 5 % higher in relative terms than the best ones in the literature.
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   REVIEW OF SUPERCRITICAL CO2 POWER CYCLE TECHNOLOGY AND CURRENT STATUS OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT [J].
Ahn, Yoonhan ;
Bae, Seong Jun ;
Kim, Minseok ;
Cho, Seong Kuk ;
Baik, Seungjoon ;
Lee, Jeong Ik ;
Cha, Jae Eun .
NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 47 (06) :647-661
[2]   CARBON DIOXIDE CONDENSATION CYCLES FOR POWER PRODUCTION [J].
ANGELINO, G .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR POWER, 1968, 90 (03) :287-&
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, The Paris Agreement
[4]   Comparison between ORC and CO2 power systems for the exploitation of low-medium temperature heat sources [J].
Astolfi, Marco ;
Alfani, Dario ;
Lasala, Silvia ;
Macchi, Ennio .
ENERGY, 2018, 161 :1250-1261
[5]  
Beggs C, 2009, ENERGY MANAGEMENT SU, V9, P208, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-7506-8670-9.00011-6, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-7506-8670-9.00011-6]
[6]   Industrial waste heat recovery technologies: An economic analysis of heat transformation technologies [J].
Brueckner, Sarah ;
Liu, Selina ;
Miro, Laia ;
Radspieler, Michael ;
Cabeza, Luisa F. ;
Laevemanna, Eberhard .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 151 :157-167
[7]   A common thread in the evolution of the configurations of supercritical CO2 power systems for waste heat recovery [J].
Carraro, Gianluca ;
Danieli, Piero ;
Lazzaretto, Andrea ;
Boatto, Tazio .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 237
[8]   Supercritical carbon dioxide cycles for power generation: A review [J].
Crespi, Francesco ;
Gavagnin, Giacomo ;
Sanchez, David ;
Martinez, Gonzalo S. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 195 :152-183
[9]   Supercritical CO2 and air Brayton-Joule versus ORC systems for heat recovery from glass furnaces: Performance and economic evaluation [J].
Danieli, Piero ;
Rech, Sergio ;
Lazzaretto, Andrea .
ENERGY, 2019, 168 :295-309
[10]  
Dostal V., 2004, A supercritical carbon dioxide cycle for next generation nuclear reactors