Impact of treatment guidelines and pivotal clinical trial results on a surgeon's decision regarding treatment for gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study using the National Clinical Database

被引:1
作者
Nunobe, Souya [1 ]
Endo, Hideki [2 ]
Honda, Michitaka [3 ]
Watanabe, Masayuki [1 ]
Yamamoto, Hiroyuki [2 ]
Kanaji, Shingo [4 ]
Kakeji, Yoshihiro [5 ]
Kodera, Yasuhiro [6 ]
Kitagawa, Yuko [7 ]
机构
[1] Ariake Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol Surg, Canc Inst, 8-31,3 Chome,Koto Ku, Ariake, Tokyo 1358550, Japan
[2] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Med, Dept Healthcare Qual Assessment, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Fukushima Med Univ, Dept Minimally Invas Surg & Med Oncol, Fukushima, Japan
[4] Japanese Soc Gastroenterol Surg, Project Management Subcomm, Tokyo, Japan
[5] Japanese Soc Gastroenterol Surg, Database Comm, Tokyo, Japan
[6] Nagoya Univ, Dept Gastroenterol Surg, Grad Sch Med, Nagoya, Japan
[7] Japanese Soc Gastroenterol Surg, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Gastric cancer; Surgery; Guideline revision; Decision making; OPEN DISTAL GASTRECTOMY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; NODAL DISSECTION; LAPAROSCOPY; TECHNOLOGY; ADOPTION; OUTCOMES; LONG;
D O I
10.1007/s00595-024-02814-0
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
PurposesThe present study evaluated the impact of clinical guidelines for gastric cancer surgery on surgeons' choice of procedure in real-world practice. We focused on the 2014 guideline revision recommending laparoscopic surgery and the evidence concerning splenectomy for prophylactic lymphadenectomy reported in 2015 using the National Clinical Database, which is the most comprehensive database in Japan.MethodsWe investigated the monthly percentages of laparoscopic distal gastrectomies performed for stage I gastric cancer (LDG%) and splenectomies performed during total gastrectomy for advanced cancer (TGS%) between 2014 and 2017. We evaluated the descriptive statistics of the time-series changes in the LDG%, TGS%, and annual trends of outcomes.ResultsIn total, 124,787 patients were enrolled. The mean LDG% and TGS% were 69.8% and 9.2%, respectively. The LDG% and TGS% were 66.4% and 16.7%, respectively, in January 2014 and 73.1% and 5.9%, respectively, in December 2017. LDG% consistently increased, and TGS% showed a consistent downward trend throughout the observation period. There was no significant change in this trend after the publication of the guideline recommendations or clinical trial results.ConclusionNo significant changes in surgical procedures were observed after publication of the guidelines or results of clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页码:1084 / 1092
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Physicians' Decision Making on Adoption of New Technologies and Role of Coverage with Evidence Development: A Qualitative Study [J].
Felgner, Susanne ;
Ex, Patricia ;
Henschke, Cornelia .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 (09) :1069-1076
[2]   Introducing new health interventions - There's still a long way to go to get health technology evidence into practice [J].
Gabbay, J ;
Walley, T .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 332 (7533) :64-65
[3]   National Clinical Database feedback implementation for quality improvement of cancer treatment in Japan: from good to great through transparency [J].
Gotoh, Mitsukazu ;
Miyata, Hiroaki ;
Hashimoto, Hideki ;
Wakabayashi, Go ;
Konno, Hiroyuki ;
Miyakawa, Shuichi ;
Sugihara, Kenichi ;
Mori, Masaki ;
Satomi, Susumu ;
Kokudo, Norihiro ;
Iwanaka, Tadashi .
SURGERY TODAY, 2016, 46 (01) :38-47
[4]   Validation of data quality in a nationwide gastroenterological surgical database: The National Clinical Database site-visit and remote audits, 2016-2018 [J].
Hasegawa, Hiroshi ;
Takahashi, Arata ;
Kanaji, Shingo ;
Kakeji, Yoshihiro ;
Marubashi, Shigeru ;
Konno, Hiroyuki ;
Gotoh, Mitsukazu ;
Miyata, Hiroaki ;
Kitagawa, Yuko ;
Seto, Yasuyuki .
ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2021, 5 (03) :296-303
[5]   Use of interrupted time series methods in the evaluation of health system quality improvement interventions: a methodological systematic review [J].
Hategeka, Celestin ;
Ruton, Hinda ;
Karamouzian, Mohammad ;
Lynd, Larry D. ;
Law, Michael R. .
BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2020, 5 (10)
[6]   Impact of guideline recommendation for novel surgical procedures on surgeons' decisions: a time series analysis of gastric cancer surgeries from a nationwide cohort study [J].
Honda, Michitaka ;
Yasunaga, Hideo ;
Michihata, Nobuaki ;
Miyakawa, Teppei ;
Kumazawa, Ryosuke ;
Matsui, Hiroki ;
Imaizumi, Takahiro .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 109 (03) :316-322
[7]  
Japan Society of Endoscopic Surgery, 2014, CLIN GUID QUAL SURG
[8]   Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition [J].
Sano T. ;
Kodera Y. .
GASTRIC CANCER, 2011, 14 (02) :101-112
[9]   Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4) [J].
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association .
GASTRIC CANCER, 2017, 20 (01) :1-19
[10]   Survival outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA or IB gastric cancer (JC0G0912): a multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 randomised controlled trial [J].
Katai, Hitoshi ;
Mizusawa, Junki ;
Katayama, Hiroshi ;
Morita, Shinji ;
Yamada, Takanobu ;
Bando, Etsuro ;
Ito, Seiji ;
Takagi, Masakazu ;
Takagane, Akinori ;
Teshima, Shin ;
Koeda, Keisuke ;
Nunobe, Souya ;
Yoshikawa, Takaki ;
Terashima, Masanori ;
Sasako, Mitsuru .
LANCET GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 5 (02) :142-151