On the efficiency and its drivers in the cryptocurrency market: the case of Bitcoin and Ethereum

被引:13
作者
Mokni, Khaled [1 ]
El Montasser, Ghassen [2 ]
Ajmi, Ahdi Noomen [3 ,4 ]
Bouri, Elie [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sousse, Higher Inst Transport & Logist Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia
[2] Univ Manouba, ESCT Business Sch Tunis, Manouba, Tunisia
[3] Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz Univ, Coll Sci & Humanities Slayel, Dept Business Adm, Al Kharj, Saudi Arabia
[4] Manouba Univ, ESC Tunis, Manouba, Tunisia
[5] Lebanese Amer Univ, Sch Business, Beirut, Lebanon
关键词
Bitcoin; Ethereum; Time-varying efficiency; AMIMs; Quantile regression; Drivers of efficiency; C58; G14; ADAPTIVE MARKET; TIME-SERIES; STOCK; INEFFICIENCY; HYPOTHESIS; LIQUIDITY; MEMORY; (IN)EFFICIENCY; INFORMATION; PERSISTENCE;
D O I
10.1186/s40854-023-00566-3
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Most previous studies on the market efficiency of cryptocurrencies consider time evolution but do not provide insights into the potential driving factors. This study addresses this limitation by examining the time-varying efficiency of the two largest cryptocurrencies, Bitcoin and Ethereum, and the factors that drive efficiency. It uses daily data from August 7, 2016, to February 15, 2023, the adjusted market inefficiency magnitude (AMIMs) measure, and quantile regression. The results show evidence of time variation in the levels of market (in)efficiency for Bitcoin and Ethereum. Interestingly, the quantile regressions indicate that global financial stress negatively affects the AMIMs measures across all quantiles. Notably, cryptocurrency liquidity positively and significantly affects AMIMs irrespective of the level of (in) efficiency, whereas the positive effect of money flow is significant when the markets of both cryptocurrencies are efficient. Finally, the COVID-19 pandemic positively and significantly affected cryptocurrency market inefficiencies across most quantiles.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 79 条
[71]   Dynamic Linkage between Bitcoin and Traditional Financial Assets: A Comparative Analysis of Different Time Frequencies [J].
Wang, Panpan ;
Liu, Xiaoxing ;
Wu, Sixu .
ENTROPY, 2022, 24 (11)
[72]   Liquidity and market efficiency in cryptocurrencies [J].
Wei, Wang Chun .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2018, 168 :21-24
[73]   A systematic review of blockchain [J].
Xu, Min ;
Chen, Xingtong ;
Kou, Gang .
FINANCIAL INNOVATION, 2019, 5 (01)
[74]   Revisiting the weak-form efficiency of the EUR/CHF exchange rate market: Evidence from episodes of different Swiss franc regimes [J].
Yang, Yan-Hong ;
Shao, Ying-Hui ;
Shao, Hao-Lin ;
Stanley, H. Eugene .
PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2019, 523 :734-746
[75]   Herding on Fundamental/Nonfundamental Information During the COVID-19 Outbreak and Cyber-Attacks: Evidence From the Cryptocurrency Market [J].
Yousaf, Imran ;
Ali, Shoaib ;
Bouri, Elie ;
Dutta, Anupam .
SAGE OPEN, 2021, 11 (03)
[76]   Information availability and return volatility in the bitcoin Market: Analyzing differences of user opinion and interest [J].
Yu, Ju Hyun ;
Kang, Juyoung ;
Park, Sangun .
INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 2019, 56 (03) :721-732
[77]   Does Bitcoin or gold react to financial stress alike? Evidence from the US and China [J].
Zhang, Hongwei ;
Wang, Peijin .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2021, 71 :629-648
[78]   Some stylized facts of the cryptocurrency market [J].
Zhang, Wei ;
Wang, Pengfei ;
Li, Xiao ;
Shen, Dehua .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2018, 50 (55) :5950-5965
[79]   On the Market Efficiency and Liquidity of High-Frequency Cryptocurrencies in a Bull and Bear Market [J].
Zhang, Yuanyuan ;
Chan, Stephen ;
Chu, Jeffrey ;
Sulieman, Hana .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 13 (01)