Integration of multi-criteria decision-making approaches adapted for quality function deployment: an analytical literature review and future research agenda

被引:12
作者
Hariri, Ahmad [1 ]
Domingues, Pedro [2 ]
Sampaio, Paulo [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minho, ALGORITMI Res Ctr, Doctoral Program Adv Engn, Syst Ind AESI,LASI, Braga, Portugal
[2] Univ Minho, ALGORITMI Res Ctr, Dept Prod & Syst, LASI, Braga, Portugal
关键词
Customer requirements (CRs); Engineering characteristics (ECs); Quality function deployment (QFD); Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM); SUPPLIER SELECTION; FUZZY QFD; MCDM APPROACH; KANO MODEL; FRAMEWORK; AHP; PRIORITIZATION; METHODOLOGY; DESIGN; TOPSIS;
D O I
10.1108/IJQRM-02-2022-0058
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose:-- This paper aims to classify journal papers in the context of hybrid quality function deployment QFD and multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods published during 2004-2021.Design/methodology/approach-- A conceptual classification scheme is presented to analyze the hybrid QFD-MCDM methods. Then some recommendations are given to introduce directions for future research.Findings-- The results show that among all related areas, the manufacturing application has the most frequency of published papers regarding hybrid QFD-MCDM methods. Moreover, using uncertainty to establish a hybrid QFD-MCDM the relevant papers have been considered during the time interval 2004-2021.Originality/value-- There are various shortcomings in conventional QFD which limit its efficiency and potential applications. Since 2004, when MCDM methods were frequently adopted in the quality management context, increasing attention has been drawn from both practical and academic perspectives. Recently, the integration of MCDM techniques into the QFD model has played an important role in designing new products and services, supplier selection, green manufacturing systems and sustainability topics. Hence, this survey reviewed hybrid QFD-MCDM methods during 2004-2021.
引用
收藏
页码:2326 / 2350
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Applications of Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making to Supplier Selection: A Literature Review
    Otheman, Adawiyah
    Abdullah, Lazim
    Ab Ghani, Ahmad Termimi
    2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS (ICBE2016), 2016, : 489 - 491
  • [42] Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Sustainable Manufacturing Management: A Systematic Literature Review and Analysis of the Prospects
    Pelissari, Renata
    Khan, Sharfuddin Ahmed
    Ben-Amor, Sarah
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2022, 21 (02) : 493 - 515
  • [43] Integration of failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis with multi-criteria decision-making in engineering applications: Part I - Manufacturing industry
    Abu Dabous, Saleh
    Ibrahim, Fakhariya
    Feroz, Sainab
    Alsyouf, Imad
    ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2021, 122
  • [44] Research on Multi-criteria Decision-making Model of Multi-variety Discrete Production and Manufacture
    Sun, Jianfang
    Zhu, Fan
    Xie, Xiaopeng
    ISISE 2008: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INFORMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, VOL 1, 2008, : 312 - +
  • [45] A multi-criteria decision-making framework for assessing the quality and cost of facility layout alternatives: a case study
    Alsyouf, I.
    Al-Araidah, O.
    Tates, M.
    Ciganovic, R.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART B-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MANUFACTURE, 2012, 226 (B2) : 353 - 364
  • [46] Comparison between Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods and Evaluating the Quality of Life at Different Spatial Levels
    Vakilipour, Samira
    Sadeghi-Niaraki, Abolghasem
    Ghodousi, Mostafa
    Choi, Soo-Mi
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (07)
  • [47] Green Logistics Outsourcing Employing Multi Criteria Decision Making and Quality Function Deployment in the Petrochemical Industry
    Vazifehdan, Mona Najar
    Darestani, Soroush Avakh
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SHIPPING AND LOGISTICS, 2019, 35 (04) : 243 - 254
  • [48] Cost Analysis of Water Quality Assessment Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach
    Seyed Farhan Moosavian
    Daryoosh Borzuei
    Abolfazl Ahmadi
    Water Resources Management, 2022, 36 : 4843 - 4862
  • [49] PAIRWISE JUDGMENTS CONSISTENCY IMPACT ON QUALITY OF MULTI-CRITERIA GROUP DECISION-MAKING WITH AHP
    Kazibudzki, Pawel Tadeusz
    Krupka, Jiri
    E & M EKONOMIE A MANAGEMENT, 2019, 22 (04): : 195 - 212
  • [50] Determination of the most appropriate fertilizing method for apple trees using multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches
    Heidarisoltanabadi, Mohsen
    Elhami, Behzad
    Imanmehr, Abdollah
    Khadivi, Ali
    FOOD SCIENCE & NUTRITION, 2024, 12 (02): : 1158 - 1169