Robotic-Assisted Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Sacrocolpopexy and Beyond

被引:1
作者
Linder, Brian J. J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Occhino, John A. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Urol, Rochester, MN USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Dept Urol, 200 First St,SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
Da Vinci device; vagina; vaginal; pelvic organ prolapse; surgery; sacrocolpopexy; SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT; HYSTERECTOMY;
D O I
10.1089/gyn.2022.0119
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Pelvic organ prolapse is a highly prevalent condition that can have a large impact on a patient's quality of life. Multiple approaches to surgical repair exist, each with a unique set of risks and benefits. For patients with apical prolapse, repair of the apex is the cornerstone of any surgical procedure. Since adaptation of robotic techniques to sacrocolpopexy were introduced in the early 2000s, the minimally invasive approach to sacrocolpopexy has surpassed open case volumes. Compared to native-tissue transvaginal procedures, minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy offers potential advantages in durability. This article reviews surgical techniques, troubleshooting, outcomes, and ongoing areas of development regarding the use of a robotic approach to prolapse surgery. (J GYNECOLOGIC SURG 2023:000)
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 29
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Long-Term Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Using Lightweight Y-Mesh [J].
Culligan, Patrick J. ;
Lewis, Christa ;
Priestley, Jennifer ;
Mushonga, Nyarai .
FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 26 (03) :202-206
[2]   Supracervical Hysterectomy Is Protective against Mesh Complications after Minimally Invasive Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy: A Population-Based Cohort Study of 12,189 Patients [J].
Dallas, Kai ;
Taich, Lior ;
Kuhlmann, Paige ;
Rogo-Gupta, Lisa ;
Eilber, Karyn ;
Anger, Jennifer T. ;
Scott, Victoria .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (03) :669-675
[3]  
Dubinskaya A, 2020, CUREUS J MED SCIENCE, V12
[4]   Enhanced Recovery and Same-Day Discharge After Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy [J].
Evans, Sarah ;
McCarter, Maggie ;
Abimbola, Obafunbi ;
Myers, Erinn M. .
FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 27 (12) :740-745
[5]   A prospective randomized trial comparing Restorelle® Y mesh and flat mesh for laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: 24-month outcomes [J].
Ferrando, Cecile A. ;
Paraiso, Marie Fidela R. .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2021, 32 (06) :1565-1570
[6]   Combined rectopexy and sacrocolpopexy is safe for correction of pelvic organ prolapse [J].
Geltzeiler, Cristina B. ;
Birnbaum, Elisa H. ;
Silviera, Matthew L. ;
Mutch, Matthew G. ;
Vetter, Joel ;
Wise, Paul E. ;
Hunt, Steven R. ;
Glasgow, Sean C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2018, 33 (10) :1453-1459
[7]  
Geoffrion R, 2021, J OBSTET GYNAECOL CA, V43, P511, DOI 10.1016/j.jogc.2021.02.001
[8]  
Guan XM, 2021, UROLOGY, V154, P109, DOI [10.1016/j.urology.2021.03.015109, 10.1016/j.urology.2021.03.015]
[9]   Surgical Management of Symptomatic Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Larouche, Maryse ;
Belzile, Eric ;
Geoffrion, Roxana .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 137 (06) :1061-1073
[10]   A National Contemporary Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes for Vaginal Vault Prolapse: Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Nonmesh Vaginal Surgery [J].
Linder, Brian J. ;
Gershman, Boris ;
Bews, Katherine A. ;
Glasgow, Amy E. ;
Occhino, John A. .
FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 25 (05) :342-346