Analyses of topical policy issues Has China's Free Trade Zone policy promoted the upgrading of service industry structure? Based on the empirical test of 185 prefecture-level cities in China

被引:16
作者
Ge, Qian-Qian [1 ]
Liu, Xi-Hua [1 ]
Zhang, Yu-Chen [2 ]
Liu, Shi-Qi [2 ]
机构
[1] Qingdao Univ, Sch Econ, Qingdao 266000, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Univ, Coll Management & Econ, Tianjin, Peoples R China
关键词
Free Trade Zone; Producer services; Modern services; Trade facilitation; Investment facilitation; POLITICAL PROMOTION; LOCAL FIRMS; INVESTMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.eap.2023.10.008
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
As the pillar industry of China's national economy, the service industry has always experienced a lag in structural upgrading. As an important measure of China's institutional innovation, China's Free Trade Zone (FTZ) policy is of great significance for promoting the development of the service industry. Based on the panel data of 185 prefecture-level cities in China from 2010 to 2019, this paper empirically tests the impact of the FTZ policy on the upgrading of service industry structure by using the progressive difference in-differences model. The results show that the FTZ policy can promote the upgrading of service industry structure, and the effect is enhanced with the extension of time. The heterogeneity test shows that the impact of the FTZ policy on the structural upgrading of the service industry is mainly reflected in promoting the development of the information service industry as well as the leasing and business service industry. The transmission mechanism test shows that the FTZ policy can promote the structural upgrading of the service industry by improving the level of trade facilitation and investment facilitation. (c) 2023 Economic Society of Australia, Queensland. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1171 / 1186
页数:16
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Audretsch D.B., 2004, HDB URBAN REGIONAL E, V4, P2713, DOI [10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80018-X, DOI 10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80018-X]
[2]  
Bai Z. L., 2020, Int. Econ. Trade Res, V36, P4, DOI [10.13687/j.cnki.gjjmts.2020.08.001, DOI 10.13687/J.CNKI.GJJMTS.2020.08.001]
[3]   How does environmental regulation influence enterprises' total factor productivity? A quasi-natural experiment based on China's new environmental protection law [J].
Cai, Wugan ;
Ye, Peiyun .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 276
[4]  
Cheng B.H., 2021, Theor. Discuss., P138
[5]  
Dai K.Z., 2020, FINANC TRADE EC, V41, P129, DOI DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1002-8102.2020.10.009
[6]  
Duan W.B., 2016, World Econ, V39, P144
[7]   Business services, innovation and sectoral growth [J].
Evangelista, Rinaldo ;
Lucchese, Matteo ;
Meliciani, Valentina .
STRUCTURAL CHANGE AND ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2013, 25 :119-132
[8]  
Feng R., 2020, Explor. Econ. Probl., P26
[9]   Research on the efficiency of factor allocation in the pilot free trade zones [J].
Feng, Wei ;
Sun, Shujun ;
Yuan, Hang .
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2023, 79 :727-745
[10]   THE RISKS OF INNOVATION: ARE INNOVATING FIRMS LESS LIKELY TO DIE? [J].
Fernandes, Ana M. ;
Paunov, Caroline .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2015, 97 (03) :638-653