Does regional collaborative governance reduce air pollution? Quasi-experimental evidence from China

被引:16
作者
Ge, Tao [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Xinrui [1 ]
Geng, Yuewen [1 ]
Yang, Keling [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Nantong Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Nantong 226019, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangsu Yangtze River Econ Belt Res Inst, Nantong 226019, Peoples R China
[3] Hubei Univ Econ, Sch Stat & Math, Wuhan 430205, Peoples R China
[4] Hubei Univ Econ, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Emiss Trading Syst Coconstr, Wuhan 430205, Hubei, Peoples R China
[5] 8 Yangqiaohu Ave, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
关键词
Regional collaborative governance; Air pollution; Spatiotemporal heterogeneity; Transmission mechanism; DID method; INVESTMENT; EMISSIONS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138283
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Regional collaborative governance has become one of the most significant trends in environmental protection due to its importance in suppressing pollution transfer. This paper employs panel data from 285 cities in China during 2003-2019 and a multi-period difference-in-differences (DID) method to evaluate the influence of regional collaborative governance on air pollution. Results show that regional collaborative governance significantly reduces air pollution. Heterogeneity assessment suggests that the inhibiting impact of regional collaborative governance on air pollution is long-term and increases temporally, whereas the spillover effect of regional collaborative governance is only significant in a specific range and decays spatially. In addition, the mechanism analysis reveals that regional collaborative governance reduces air pollution by increasing environmental regulation intensity, improving environmental governance efficiency, and promoting environmental protection technology. This study provides useful policy insights for policymakers seeking green and sustainable development to curb air pollution and improve environmental quality.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 70 条
[11]   New evidence on the impact of sustained exposure to air pollution on life expectancy from China's Huai River Policy [J].
Ebenstein, Avraham ;
Fan, Maoyong ;
Greenstone, Michael ;
He, Guojun ;
Zhou, Maigeng .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2017, 114 (39) :10384-10389
[12]   The Institutional Collective Action Framework [J].
Feiock, Richard C. .
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 2013, 41 (03) :397-425
[13]   Research on the spatial differences of pollution-intensive industry transfer under the environmental regulation in China [J].
Fu, Shuke ;
Ma, Zhuo ;
Ni, Bing ;
Peng, Jiachao ;
Zhang, Lijing ;
Fu, Qiang .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2021, 129
[14]   Does neighboring green development benefit or suffer from local economic growth targets? Evidence from China [J].
Ge, Tao ;
Li, Chunying ;
Li, Jinye ;
Hao, Xionglei .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2023, 120
[15]   The impact of environmental regulation efficiency loss on inclusive growth: Evidence from China [J].
Ge, Tao ;
Qiu, Wei ;
Li, Jinye ;
Hao, Xionglei .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 268 (268)
[16]   The effect of urban innovation performance of smart city construction policies: Evaluate by using a multiple period difference-in-differences model [J].
Guo, Qingbin ;
Zhong, Jinrong .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2022, 184
[17]   Can China railway express improve environmental efficiency? Evidence from China's cities [J].
Hu, Shuo ;
Wang, Ailun ;
Du, Keri ;
Si, Lulu .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2023, 99
[18]   Air pollution and economic growth under local government competition: Evidence from China, 2007-2016 [J].
Jiang, Shurui ;
Tan, Xue ;
Hu, Peiqi ;
Wang, Yue ;
Shi, Lei ;
Ma, Zhong ;
Lu, Genfa .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 334
[19]   Stimulate or inhibit? Multiple environmental regulations and pollution-intensive Industries' Transfer in China [J].
Jiang, Zhujun ;
Lyu, Pinjie .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 328
[20]   Pollution abatement costs and foreign direct investment inflows to US states [J].
Keller, W ;
Levinson, A .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2002, 84 (04) :691-703