The Economic Impact of the Paris Agreement on Sectoral Outputs in Turkiye: An Input-Output Approach

被引:0
作者
Boran, Mustafa [1 ]
Kayacan, Bekir [2 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Univ, Grad Sch Social Sci, Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Istanbul Univ, Fac Econ, Istanbul, Turkiye
来源
ISTANBUL IKTISAT DERGISI-ISTANBUL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS | 2023年 / 73卷 / 01期
关键词
Emission reduction; The Paris Agreement; Economic impact analysis; Input-output model; CLIMATE-CHANGE; GREEN;
D O I
10.26650/ISTJECON2022-1211511
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study analyzes the economic impact of the Paris Agreement on sectoral outputs in Turkiye. All member countries are required to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions by the Agreement according to their responsibilities and capabilities. In this regard, developed countries are subject to absolute emission reduction. Turkiye ratified the Agreement in 2021 as a developing country and started implementation in 2022 as stated in the Nationally Determined Contributions. Regarding implementation of the Agreement, three scenarios are analyzed: the business-as-usual (as a developing country), the absolute emission reduction (as a developed country), and the exit (exiting the Agreement). Emission pathways and reduction amounts for each scenario are estimated accordingly. An input-output model is used based on 2018 tables for 45 sectors. Five policy options are analyzed regarding how to distribute the emission reduction burden among sectors: all sectors according to their shares in 2018 emissions (option 1); the top 9 sectors whose emission coefficients are above average (option 2); the top 6 sectors whose emission multipliers are high (option 3); the top 11 sectors whose emission multipliers are above average (option 4); the top 12 sectors which are the top 11 in option 4 plus the construction sector (option 5). Reducing emissions significantly reduces sectoral output in all scenarios and policy options. However, the impact of the business-as-usual is less than absolute emission reduction. Targeting only a few sectors in emission reduction results in a lower impact. If policy options are sorted by their total cost from smallest to largest, the order would be 3, 2, 4, 5, and 1.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 452
页数:34
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Achieving development and mitigation objectives through a decarbonization development pathway in South Africa
    Altieri, Katye E.
    Trollip, Hilton
    Caetano, Tara
    Hughes, Alison
    Merven, Bruno
    Winkler, Harald
    [J]. CLIMATE POLICY, 2016, 16 : S78 - S91
  • [2] Application of computable general equilibrium (CGE) to climate change mitigation policy: A systematic review
    Babatunde, Kazeem Alasinrin
    Begum, Rawshan Ara
    Said, Fathin Faizah
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 78 : 61 - 71
  • [3] Blitzer C.R., 1990, WORKING PAPERS, V558
  • [4] HOW TO GO GREEN: a general equilibrium investigation of environmental policies for sustained growth with an application to Turkey's economy
    Bouzaher, Aziz
    Sahin, Sebnem
    Yeldan, Erinc
    [J]. LETTERS IN SPATIAL AND RESOURCE SCIENCES, 2015, 8 (01) : 49 - 76
  • [5] Dejuan O., 2018, ENV EC IMPACTS DECAR, P50
  • [6] EUROSTAT, 2021, AIR EM ACC NACE REV
  • [7] ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATION AND UNITED-STATES ECONOMIC-GROWTH
    JORGENSON, DW
    WILCOXEN, PJ
    [J]. RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1990, 21 (02) : 314 - 340
  • [8] Kayacan B., 2020, TURK EK SEKT AR GIRD, V2nd
  • [9] Economics of climate change and green employment: A general equilibrium investigation for Turkey
    Kolsuz, Gunes
    Yeldan, A. Erinc
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 70 : 1240 - 1250
  • [10] Kratena K., 1999, J EC SYSTEMS RES, V1999, P245, DOI [10.1080/09535319900000017, DOI 10.1080/09535319900000017]