The US-China trade war and the volatility linkages between energy and agricultural commodities

被引:27
作者
Cheng, Natalie Fang Ling [1 ]
Hasanov, Akram Shavkatovich [1 ]
Poon, Wai Ching [2 ]
Bouri, Elie [3 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Dept Econometr & Business Stat, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
[2] Univ Teknol PETRONAS, Fac Sci & Informat Technol, Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia
[3] Lebanese Amer Univ, Sch Business, Beirut, Lebanon
关键词
Agricultural commodities; Covariance; COVID-19; Crude oil; Multivariate GARCH model; U; S; -China trade; Exogenous chocks; Volatility impulse response function (VIRF); Volatility spillover; OIL PRICE SHOCKS; CRUDE-OIL; FOOD-PRICES; DEPENDENCE STRUCTURE; CROSS-CORRELATIONS; RISK SPILLOVER; CO-MOVEMENT; ETHANOL; MARKETS; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106605
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Any disruptive changes in the competitive environment, such as the U.S.-China trade war, may influence the price volatility of crude oil and agricultural commodities. This study examines the volatility linkage between crude oil and agricultural commodity markets in the context of the U.S.-China trade war and compares the impact of the trade war with that of other exogenous shocks. The results show that the volatility of soybeans exhibits the highest level of responsiveness to the U.S.-China trade war -which is not surprising given that the U. S. agribusiness trade to China is dominated by soybeans -followed by coffee and cotton. The sizes and dynamics of the impacts of shocks are largely commodity-specific. Notably, the trade war impacts most agricultural commodities more extensively than other exogenous shocks, including the global financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic and associated recession. These findings matter not only for the decision-making of investors and portfolio managers but also for commodity-exporting and importing countries because changes in the volatility dynamics of crude oil and agricultural commodities often impact export revenues and import expenditures and consequently feed through exports to the global supply chain under exogenous shocks such as the U.S.-China trade war.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 94 条
[1]   Asymmetric price volatility transmission between food and energy markets: The case of Spain [J].
Abdelradi, Fadi ;
Serra, Teresa .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 46 (04) :503-513
[2]   How is volatility in commodity markets linked to oil price shocks? [J].
Ahmadi, Maryam ;
Behmiri, Niaz Bashiri ;
Manera, Matteo .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2016, 59 :11-23
[3]  
Al-Maadid A., 2017, International Economics, V150, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.INTECO.2016.06.005, 10.1016/j.inteco.2016.06.005]
[4]   Cross-correlations between Brazilian biofuel and food market: Ethanol versus sugar [J].
Albuquerque Lima, Cristiane Rocha ;
de Melo, Gabriel Rivas ;
Stosic, Borko ;
Stosic, Tatijana .
PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2019, 513 :687-693
[5]   The interaction between food prices and oil prices [J].
Alghalith, Moawia .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2010, 32 (06) :1520-1522
[6]   Assessing contagion risk from energy and non-energy commodity markets [J].
Algieri, Bernardina ;
Leccadito, Arturo .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2017, 62 :312-322
[7]   A cointegration analysis of agricultural, energy and bio-fuel spot, and futures prices [J].
Allen, David E. ;
Chang, Chialin ;
McAleer, Michael ;
Singh, Abhay K. .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2018, 50 (07) :804-823
[8]  
Amadeo K., 2021, Top economic events of the 21st Century
[9]  
Amadeo K., 2020, COVID OTHER PANDEMIC
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Bloomberg News